I am designing a sewer network with several weirs and outfalls. For modelling the weir I am using a control structure (inline weir) in the rainwater outlet and a orifice control structure in the waste water outlet.
The obtained results seems to be wrong because of the inline weir. The Manhole A420 overflows although the rainwater outlet is only at 32% of its capacity.
The weir height is 10cm, so it can't be causing such overflow. The result of the same network without the weir is:
I need help with this design.
Thanks in advance.
I recommend setting the calculation option Active Numerical Solver to Explicit (SWMM Solvers).
I don't see what you described when using that solver.
Regards,
Craig Calvin
Bentley Technical Support
Here are some suggestions for an improved solution using the Implicit solver.
Split conduit "Rainwater Outlet" with a transition
Before:
After:
Transition Properties:
Conduit/Weir Properties:
1. Remove headloss due to the conduits' bend angle at the transition.
Set the field "Has User Defined Bend Angle?" to True
Set the field "Bend Angle (User Defined)" to 0 degrees.
2. Set the conduit upstream of the transition to have section type Irregular Closed Section
3. For this example, I calculated the Chord Length for incremental elevations to create the cross section. Copy the following Elevation and Chord Length values (calculated in Excel) and paste them into the Depth Width Curve's Elevation and Width fields.
Invert Elevation = 1739.74 m
Weir Height = 0.1 m
Radius = 0.75 m
Elevation = Distance from Center + Height
Chord Length = 2*SQRT((Radius^2)-(DistanceFromCenter^2))
Height
Distance
from Center
Elevation
Chord Length
0.1
0.65
1739.84
0.7483
0.15
0.6
1739.89
0.9000
0.2
0.55
1739.94
1.0198
0.25
0.5
1739.99
1.1180
0.3
0.45
1740.04
1.2000
0.35
0.4
1740.09
1.2689
1740.14
1.3266
1740.19
1.3748
1740.24
1.4142
1740.29
1.4457
1740.34
1.4697
1740.39
1.4866
0.7
0.05
1740.44
1.4967
0.75
0
1740.49
1.5000
0.8
1740.54
0.85
1740.59
0.9
1740.64
0.95
1740.69
1
1740.74
1.05
1740.79
1.1
1740.84
1.15
1740.89
1.2
1740.94
1.25
1740.99
1.3
1741.04
1.35
1741.09
1.4
1741.14
1.45
1741.19
0.5385
1.5
1741.24
0.0000
Answer Verified By: Luis Varas Garcia
Here is the profile after making the above changes.