This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

Upstream or middle Gutter Nodes simulation where no Catch basin needed

Hi, which element should I use to model a superficial network of gutters and only when the capacity of those gutters are exceeded I include a  Catch basin?

Imagine there is a long street (on grade) and there are some catchments that contribute along the gutter or small channel, there is a length where the section is enough to transport the flow and the catchments are connected to a nodes (not catch basins), only when the capacity of the gutter/channel is exceeded or 90% for example I include a catch basin.

I've tried with gutters but the upstream node or middle nodes have to be catch basins, first I don't need to catch any flow and second I don't need to include a pipe (conduit) out of every catch basin.

I've tried too with channels, but the nodes are "cross sections elements", the sections to model are limited (only trapezoidal and irregular), when I include the catch basin the invert of the channel is connected to the invert of the CB and not to the rim.

I think I've been using the wrong element to simulate my case, please let me know how to do it.

Thanks

Parents
  • Hello Ricky,

    Which software are you using?

    Channels, cross sections and the catch basins are best suited for your case. Please note that channels and cross sections cannot be designed they can only be analyzed.

    About the invert levels of the channels,  if you don't want the invert levels of the channels to connect to the catch basin invert levels then you can specify "Set Invert to stop " to FALSE and specify the required invert level of the channel stop node as required.

    Regards,

    Sushma Choure

    Bentley Technical Suppport

  • Hi Sushma, thank you very much for your answer; I've tried Stormcad and Civil Storm as application of rational method for these case and I got the same results that explained before.

    Now with your advice I'll try to model it again more carefully; at first when I simulated with channel, cross sections and catch basins, I found that the parabolic sections is not predefined (only trapezoidal and irregular), should I do it as irregular section to create a parabolic section?
    In the other hand I notice something strange when I was trying different elements: the flow out of the catchment is the same conveyed by the channel but is not the same out of the channel, I mean, out of the catch basin conduit (100% captured) is less than the flow in the channel, I saw the difference and I replace the end node with an outfall (free) and it happened again, the flow out of the outfall is less than the flow that arrives in the channel.

    I'll repeat everything and if I get the same result I'll let you know and I'll send you the example file.

    Thanks again.
  • Hi Sushma, I tried again and I found this:

    1. It seems like there is no connection between the Channel and the CB Rim even if I specify  "Set Invert to Stop = False" and I set manually the Rim elevation of the CB. According to the results, the flow out of the Channel goes to the conduit of the CB and there is no By-pass flow even when I specify only 40% capture for example.
    2. After running it says that "There is not a Gutter out of the CB" it means it cannot be a Channel out of CB.
    3. I tried replacing the Channel immediately upstream of the Catch Basin by a Gutter but then the software can't run because it needs a CB as start node for the gutter.
    4. Here I attach a link with an example file with 3 scenarios, please check it and let me know the solution if you can.

    Thanks

  • Hello Ricky,

    Regarding #1 - correct, with the GVF Rational solver, when a channel is connected to a catchbasin, flow from the channel will be interpreted as sub-surface (as opposed to approaching the inlet opening.).

    Regarding #2 - correct, bypass flow from a catchbasin inlet must be conveyed downstream in a gutter link element.

    Regarding #3 - technically a cross section is a permissible upstream element for a gutter though I do not believe this is what you need in this situation.

    Regarding "the flow out of the outfall is less than the flow that arrives in the channel." - most likely the reduction in flow you see is due to an increase in the system flow time. When the GVF Rational solver re-computes the rational method equation (Q=CIA) at the end of the channel, the increase in the system flow time results in a lower intensity and lower flow. See more in this wiki article:

    Why does flow or velocity sometimes decrease when moving downstream?

    I'm not entirely clear on what you are trying to accomplish but it sounds like you do not yet know what size inlets to use and/or where or how many to place and would like to see the gutter depth and spread first.

    You may want to consult with any local standards on inlet placement, use an initial guess and check the results. Or, populate the inlet catalog with standard inlet sizes and opening lengths and let the automated design feature size the inlet openings to meet depth/spread requirements.

    If you must lay out the gutters only without "real" inlets, you could try inserting catchbasin elements with Inlet Type set to Maximum Capacity and the maximum flow set to something very small like 0.01 L/s.

    Note that starting with V8i SELECTseries 3, the GVF Rational solver in CivilStorm can compute surface inlet and gutter results without having to lay out sub-surface network conduits and outfalls. See "Inlet only hydraulics in this article:

    What's New in SewerGEMS and CivilStorm V8i SELECTSeries 4


    Regards,

    Jesse Dringoli
    Technical Support Manager, OpenFlows
    Bentley Communities Site Administrator
    Bentley Systems, Inc.

    Answer Verified By: Rommel 

  • Hi Jesse, thank you very much for you detailed answer, everything you wrote has bee understood, my doubt is not regarding to standards or where to locate inlets; I just want to carry flow as much as I can in gutters and only when it's capacity is going to be exceeded then I locate an inlet. I began to simulate this with Autodesk SSA and I wanted to compare with CivilStorm or Stormcad, with SSA I used Nodes and Inlets and with CivilStorm I could't at first but now with your advice I used Inlets with very small captured flow and no conduit even when I get a message after the simulation regarding to isolated node or CB without an outfall.

    You solved my problem but I would like have had a different option, In order to avoid misunderstandings it's necessary to represent this inlets (unreal ones) with a different symbol. I want to show all gutters and their hydraulic capacity, the distribution of catchments along the gutters (distributed flow) before they reach the first needed CB.

    Thanks a lot.
  • Hello Ricky,

    The catch basin symbol can't be edited in standalone. You can edit the catch basin cell that is used when integrated with MicroStation, but it would apply to all catch basins. To visually differentiate between the two catch basins, I recommend using element symbology (annotations and/or color coding).

    To do this:

    1. Open element symbology manager.
    2. Right-click on Catch Basin > New > Color Coding
    3. Set Field Name to Inlet Type
    4. Click the Initialize icon.
    5. You can edit the values and assigned colors.
    6. Click OK

    See the following article for more information.

    How do you add color coding or annotation to an element?

     

    Regards,

    Craig Calvin

    Bentley Technical Support

Reply
  • Hello Ricky,

    The catch basin symbol can't be edited in standalone. You can edit the catch basin cell that is used when integrated with MicroStation, but it would apply to all catch basins. To visually differentiate between the two catch basins, I recommend using element symbology (annotations and/or color coding).

    To do this:

    1. Open element symbology manager.
    2. Right-click on Catch Basin > New > Color Coding
    3. Set Field Name to Inlet Type
    4. Click the Initialize icon.
    5. You can edit the values and assigned colors.
    6. Click OK

    See the following article for more information.

    How do you add color coding or annotation to an element?

     

    Regards,

    Craig Calvin

    Bentley Technical Support

Children
  • Hello Craig, I continued working on my model and I've got new doubts, maybe you could help me:
    1- Is it possible to verify the Flow/Capacity (design) relationship for a gutter? as I see it, it's only possible for conduits. I would like to use color coding to identify gutters with not enough capacity.
    2- I've connected 2 conduits to the same outfall (free) but the discharge shown as a result in outfall table belongs only to one conduit, not the sum of both conduit's flows. Why is that?
    3- How do I simulate a double or triple grate catch basin? I don't see the option to increase this number, the only way I find is to enlarge the grate dimensions.

    Thanks again
  • Hello Ricky,

    1. The Flow/Capacity (design) is not available for gutters, but if you have say user defined section for the gutters, software does calculate the depth/rise ration which might be helpful for you.

    Regards,

    Sushma Choure

    Bentley Technical Suppport

  • Hello Ricky,

    2. I tested this is a sample and the results at the outfall were the combined flow results from the two conduits connected to the outfall. I would review your model and your results to assure everything is set up correctly. If the model is set up correctly, we will likely need to see a copy of the model to look into this.

    There are two options for sharing your model on Communities, whichever you choose please be sure to zip your files first. The first option is to attach the zip file containing your model to your reply on the forum using the Advanced Reply Editor (you'll find the link below and to the right of the reply box). If your data is confidential please use the instructions in the link below to send it via Bentley Sharefile. Files uploaded to Sharefile can only be viewed by Bentley employees. Please be sure to reply on this thread with the name of the file after it has been uploaded.

    communities.bentley.com/.../7079.be-communities-secure-file-upload

    If you upload the model to Sharefile, post here with the name of the file so that we know it is available.

    3. If you have details on the size of the grate, you could include this in the engineering library. The general steps to edit and add to the engineering library can be found here: communities.bentley.com/.../7478.modifying-and-adding-entries-to-engineering-libraries. Otherwise, you may need to adjust the size of the grate to account for the different size.

    Regards,
    Scott
  • Hi Scott, I already upload a file, name CBJ L5 R2.zip
  • Hello Ricky,

    I have sent you a private message regarding #2.

    The workaround is to use two separate outfall nodes, or insert an intermediate manhole or transition node in each of the adjacent conduits.

    Related Defect: #618841


    Regards,

    Jesse Dringoli
    Technical Support Manager, OpenFlows
    Bentley Communities Site Administrator
    Bentley Systems, Inc.

    Answer Verified By: Rommel