Dear Jessi:
This case without using the PRV upstream the FCV valve:
Kindly, I have a model a gravity system controlled by a FCV that restrict the flow up to 1141.6m^3/hr where the pipeline is DN700 Ductile and of length 33.5 km. I follow all the steps to modify the FCV to TCV. As a result, The Cv initial = 0.81278m^3/sec/mH2O^0.5 based on hl = 57.86 m and the Cv at full open = 67.76146 m^3/sec/mH2O^0.5 based on inactive initial condition for the FCV and a minor loss coefficient =0.24 (this value for butterfly valves for 5dgree from manufacturer). in this way the TCV works as FCV for maximum flow = 1141.6m^3/hr
The next step:
I proposed an operating rule as shown in the following figure below.
I select the butterfly as a Valve type, and after reviewing the curve of the valve closure % and Cv %; I want to the initial closure to be 5%. As for the curve of the selected valve type, the Cv% will be 91% closure, accordingly, the calculated initial Cv = 0.91*67.76146 = 61.66293m^3/sec/mH2O^0.5 to be inserted as initial CV:
After computing initial condition, no problem shown about the closure I have selected, but since the CV initial value is changed to new value 61.66293m^3/sec/mH2O^0.5; the TCV as a FCV didn't control the flow up to 1141.6m^3/hr it leave the system to a larger flow 1,802.357m^3/hr as in the original system without FCV and the Compute Tool didn't work for surge. Please advice.
Some other questions:
-is there is a preferable operating rule ranges for FCV or as the designer believe?
- is the minor loss coefficient i selected acceptable for full open 0.24?
The following represent the results if i build the model without PRV:
Kindly, I have a model to a FCV to restrict the flow up to 1141.6m^3/hr where the pipe line is DN700 DI and of length 33.5 km. I follow all the steps to modify the FCV to TCV. As a result, The Cv initial = 0.08274 m^3/sec/mH2O^0.5 based on hl = 14.68m and the Cv at full open = 3.47495 m^3/sec/mH2O^0.5 based on inactive initial condition for the FCV and a minor loss coefficient =0.24. Note that there is a PRV just upstream the FCV just to reduce the pressure up to 2 bars as per requirement of the design).
I proposed an operating rule as shown previously.
I select the butterfly as a Valve type, and after reviewing the curve of the valve closure % and Cv %; I want to the initial closure to be 5%. As for the curve of the selected valve type, the Cv% will be 91% closure, accordingly, the calculated initial Cv = 0.91*3.47495 = 3.162 m^3/sec/mH2O^0.5 to be inserted as initial CV:
After computing initial condition, no problem shown about the closure I have selected, but since the CV initial value is changed to new value; the TCV as a FCV didn't control the flow up to 1141.6m^3/hr it leave the system to a larger flow 1,802.357m^3/hr as in the original system without FCV and the Compute Tool didn't work for surge. Please advice.
analysis with PRV upstream the FCV and without PRV.zip
Sawsan Bataineh
Project Manager
Answer Verified By: Sawsan Bataineh