In the last days I see much new articles about several versions of Microstation in the WIKI.
Many of the articles seam to be copied from the Ask Inga site.
The problem is that many of the Ask Inga articles are written for Microstation 95, SE or J.
In my opinion the articles should be up to date for Microstation XM or Athens or not placed in the WIKI.
Perhaps the WIKI should be separated in versions of Microstation.
Harry
Tagging was easy to say. But thinking a bit of it there are problems. Just tagging versions with what? 8,9 or XM or v8 etc.
Saying "this is a wiki - you can do it yourself" is ducking the problems. Sure we can do it IF THERE IS A STRUCTURE TO DO IT IN. Everything else will be caos.
Wikipedia has "categories" - would solve the issue - but can it be done in be.org?
MicroStation on English Wikipedia is tagged with four categories; Categories: Computer-aided design software | Windows software | 3D graphics software | CNC, CAD, and CAM
And the more I think of this - the more I believe we also need "discussion" pages. First to put up suggestions, find concensus or just proof reading. Second people surely hesitate going into a askinga-page and do edits directly.
regards / Thomas Voghera
For all tense and purposes, tags == categories == tags, so there is no <ducking the problems> there.
As the need for wiki topic discussions emerge, we will pursue options. For the time being, the most appropriate Forum seems most suitable for that.
2. things as well Harry.
1. Not everyone is up full time into XM let alone thinking of Athens.
2. most of these tutes etc were written by non-Bentley people. We can't expect Inga and other to have a lot of time going through and updating these articles. Saying that though, it would be nice to have an incentive from B to do so :-) ( need to get some smilies)