Analysis and design forums

The attachment shows some forums which I have bookmarked.

1. Analysis and Design Forum links to http://communities.bentley.com/products/structural/structural_analysis___design/f/275893.aspx
   
2. Building Analysis and Design links to http://communities.bentley.com/products/building/building_analysis___design/f/5917.aspx
   
3. Microstation V8i links to  http://communities.bentley.com/products/microstation/microstation_v8i/f/19565.aspx
   
4. Performance Group links to http://communities.bentley.com/products/building/performance/f/275871.aspx
   
5. Structural Analysis and Design links to http://communities.bentley.com/products/structural/drafting___detailing/f/5932.aspx 

In my opinion there is something wrong with 1. and 5.

The text for 1. should be replaced by the text for 5.

The text for  5. should be "Structural drafting and detailing".

Ahhh... I see. Yes, this is something else that we wanted feedback regarding. In some of the Product communities, we chose "titles" that were verbose (e.g. MicroStation > MicroStation V8i > MicroStation V8i - DWG, etc.) and in others went for brevity (e.g. Building > Performance). For the former, it makes sense from a list perspective (as your image shows). From a breadcrumb perspective, the "short description" looks better. There does not appear to be a way to have both (one for lists, another for the preadcrumb), so which one do you think we should go with?

Ahhh... I see. Yes, this is something else that we wanted feedback regarding. In some of the Product communities, we chose "titles" that were verbose (e.g. MicroStation > MicroStation V8i > MicroStation V8i - DWG, etc.) and in others went for brevity (e.g. Building > Performance). For the former, it makes sense from a list perspective (as your image shows). From a breadcrumb perspective, the "short description" looks better. There does not appear to be a way to have both (one for lists, another for the preadcrumb), so which one do you think we should go with?