<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://communities.bentley.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><channel><title>Chuck K.'s Activities</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/members/0195b4d4_2d00_56d4_2d00_4b07_2d00_beb8_2d00_7e433f469812</link><description>Chuck K.'s recent activity</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 12</generator><item><title>Masking Problem</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/road___site_design/f/geopak-inroads-mx-openroads-forum/248483/masking-problem</link><pubDate>Thu, 03 Aug 2023 11:51:34 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:aabe469d-ded2-4f20-803f-06e7ff20f2a5</guid><dc:creator>Chuck K.</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I&amp;#39;m having a problem where I am using masked text in a file and when I draw a line in the file (a series of grid lines for a profile) certain levels do not get masked out but if I use a different level they do get masked out. Why do some levels get masked but other levels do not?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Object Reference not set to an instance of an object (10.08.01.33)</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/road___site_design/f/geopak-inroads-mx-openroads-forum/209066/object-reference-not-set-to-an-instance-of-an-object-10-08-01-33</link><pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2021 14:58:24 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:d865a514-b441-4449-a6a7-dc43814c7d06</guid><dc:creator>Chuck K.</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;All of a sudden a lot of us are now getting the error message below.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img alt=" " src="/resized-image/__size/320x240/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/5922/1832.Error.JPG" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I have found this post&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="/products/road___site_design/f/geopak-inroads-mx-openroads-forum/198623/openroads-error-object-reference-not-set-to-an-instance-of-an-object"&gt;OpenRoads Error: &amp;quot;Object Reference not set to an instance of an object.&amp;quot; - OpenRoads | OpenSite Forum - OpenRoads | OpenSite - Bentley Communities&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;and have tried the batch file and it still doesn&amp;#39;t work.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;We get this error when we try to get a horizontal alignment report, however if that alignment has a proposed vertical profile the horz align report works. So if the alignment doesn&amp;#39;t have a profile, I just place a quick two point profile, set it active then I get the horz alignment report then I delete the fake profile. According to the original post above this happened when trying another command so I can see this snowballing. Any idea how to fix this? This is critical.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>SignCAD Clearview Fonts not showing up in Text Fonts dialog box (PB 10.02.00.11)</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/road___site_design/f/geopak-inroads-mx-openroads-forum/229447/signcad-clearview-fonts-not-showing-up-in-text-fonts-dialog-box-pb-10-02-00-11</link><pubDate>Fri, 06 May 2022 13:40:08 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:29c6fe25-d653-46b9-9771-6684af68a61f</guid><dc:creator>Chuck K.</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;We installed SC on a new machine and we cannot get the clearview fonts to appear in the Text Font dialog box. We can choose the More Fonts... button and get them but how do we get them to display in the dialog box as shown in the attached image (taken from another machine).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img alt=" " src="/resized-image/__size/320x240/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/5922/3404.SC.jpg" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Dynamic XSEC view problems 10.10.01.03</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/road___site_design/f/geopak-inroads-mx-openroads-forum/227236/dynamic-xsec-view-problems-10-10-01-03</link><pubDate>Fri, 18 Mar 2022 12:25:43 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:70a37599-0be6-4455-abfe-2855b685bc45</guid><dc:creator>Chuck K.</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;A lot of us are having problems with components not showing up in the dynamic XSEC view. They show in the 3D view and the line strings are in the 2D view. See the image below.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img alt=" " src="/resized-image/__size/320x240/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/5922/Screenshot-2022_2D00_03_2D00_18-082531.jpg" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Any idea as to why this is happening?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Out of Memory Exception (SS10 to CONNECT 2020)</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/road___site_design/f/geopak-inroads-mx-openroads-forum/223434/out-of-memory-exception-ss10-to-connect-2020</link><pubDate>Tue, 14 Dec 2021 12:55:01 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:eb7fab4e-bcbc-40cd-844a-3443793d690c</guid><dc:creator>Chuck K.</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;We have had this problem in SS10 and CONNECT 2020. Whenever we initiate the Corridor Objects tool and tag the Point Control option we get the attached error message. It only crashes when we select the Point Control option, it doesn&amp;#39;t crash when we select any other option. It happens on a model that has been created for months and it happens on models that have just been created that day.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img alt=" " src="/resized-image/__size/320x240/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/5922/Error.JPG.png" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Survey Decorations all turned to hash marks (10.09.00.91)</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/road___site_design/f/geopak-inroads-mx-openroads-forum/220346/survey-decorations-all-turned-to-hash-marks-10-09-00-91</link><pubDate>Tue, 05 Oct 2021 18:27:40 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:44e7aea7-5082-4e40-9041-a5100233005d</guid><dc:creator>Chuck K.</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Im not sure what happened but all of our survey text is now showing hash marks instead of the text. This is a 2D file that was exported to 2D from the original 3D survey file so I would think that all the intelligence was stripped so I don&amp;#39;t know how all the text changed. Any idea on how to fix this?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img alt=" " src="/resized-image/__size/320x240/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/5922/Screenshot-2021_2D00_10_2D00_05-141905.JPG" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Profile Creation ORD Release 3</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/road___site_design/f/geopak-inroads-mx-openroads-forum/216031/profile-creation-ord-release-3</link><pubDate>Wed, 30 Jun 2021 14:27:49 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:f5f01432-0e17-4438-b07a-fcb438cd4700</guid><dc:creator>Chuck K.</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I was wondering what the best workflow is for creating a proposed vertical profile that has proposed elements plus using parts of the existing profile. What&amp;#39;s the best way to &amp;quot;trace&amp;quot; portions of the existing profile in with the proposed vertical info. then chain it all? We have a profile that contains a designed vertical, then we want to use a chunk of existing profile then another chunk of designed profile then ex then proposed.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Cross Section Report is Blank (10.09.00.91)</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/road___site_design/f/geopak-inroads-mx-openroads-forum/213810/cross-section-report-is-blank-10-09-00-91</link><pubDate>Wed, 12 May 2021 19:59:46 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:f6e42a4f-fe6b-47f6-949e-091e0c5b2e90</guid><dc:creator>Chuck K.</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;My cross section report is blank and I do not know why? My terrain is the correct feature.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img alt=" " src="/resized-image/__size/320x240/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/5922/Screenshot-2021_2D00_05_2D00_12-155845.JPG" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Legacy Tools in ORD R3</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/road___site_design/f/geopak-inroads-mx-openroads-forum/212966/legacy-tools-in-ord-r3</link><pubDate>Thu, 22 Apr 2021 13:31:50 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:57c6e128-3724-4a01-8043-38ff5b830968</guid><dc:creator>Chuck K.</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Are the old DTM drainage analysis tools shown below available&amp;nbsp;in ORD, especially the surface ponding tool?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img alt=" " src="/resized-image/__size/320x240/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/5922/Screenshot-2021_2D00_04_2D00_22-091839.JPG" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>ORD XY,Elev Report (Release 2)</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/road___site_design/f/geopak-inroads-mx-openroads-forum/210770/ord-xy-elev-report-release-2</link><pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2021 14:28:41 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:535721c5-994f-46f0-9805-080a676336d3</guid><dc:creator>Chuck K.</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Is there a way to get a report of all the top surface line string end points (EOP, EOS, etc.) XY and elevation as shown below.?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img alt=" " src="/resized-image/__size/320x240/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/5922/Screenshot-2021_2D00_03_2D00_08-092449.png" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Overlay Not Working (10.08.01.33)</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/road___site_design/f/geopak-inroads-mx-openroads-forum/208483/overlay-not-working-10-08-01-33</link><pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2021 17:04:16 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:82b54d1d-e84f-46a5-adcb-61cae25952e0</guid><dc:creator>Chuck K.</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;My overlay component is not working. It works when tested in the template library but not in the model. It may work 5% of the time. See images below. Any idea as to why it is not working?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Works&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img alt=" " src="/resized-image/__size/320x240/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/5922/works.JPG" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Does not work&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img alt=" " src="/resized-image/__size/320x240/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/5922/doesnt-work.JPG" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img alt=" " src="/resized-image/__size/320x240/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/5922/doesnt-work2.JPG" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Profile Named Boundaries Disappeared (2020 R2-10.08.01.33)</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/road___site_design/f/geopak-inroads-mx-openroads-forum/204748/profile-named-boundaries-disappeared-2020-r2-10-08-01-33</link><pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2020 13:07:49 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:7ab4c03e-4646-4783-8c8d-abc90114fd11</guid><dc:creator>Chuck K.</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;We altered our horizontal alignment after placing profile named boundaries and now profile named boundaries are gone. Is this how the program works?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Batch Process to Rotate Border and View</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/microstation/f/microstation-forum/203976/batch-process-to-rotate-border-and-view</link><pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2020 14:21:24 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:4200d1cf-0d57-4819-ac9c-e1a157a92d6c</guid><dc:creator>Chuck K.</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I need to figure out a batch process for many files to rotate a border 180 degrees (which is a cell), rotate the view 180 degrees, fit view then save settings but I cannot figure out the commands. Any help would be appreciated.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Milling Report Stations Wrong 08.11.09.897</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/road___site_design/f/geopak-inroads-mx-openroads-forum/178423/milling-report-stations-wrong-08-11-09-897</link><pubDate>Thu, 18 Apr 2019 19:16:08 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:4cade252-9271-45f5-8a8a-0e5ee75a16bc</guid><dc:creator>Chuck K.</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;When I use the Milling Report tool, my stationing is all wrong. I found this article from Chris Key and copied the new report but the stations are even worse. The true start station in my model is 555+91.90 but the imperial report station is 8+38.95 (see below), the report that came with the software shows a station of 575+05.40?? Both reports are wrong.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img alt=" " height="176" src="/resized-image/__size/320x240/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/5922/3583.jpg" width="326" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Set varying lane width when creating superelevation</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/road___site_design/f/geopak-inroads-mx-openroads-forum/110082/set-varying-lane-width-when-creating-superelevation</link><pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2015 19:08:32 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:2ceae663-ddcd-4442-ab7d-68996a3fc4f1</guid><dc:creator>Ben Johnson</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Is there a way to specify a varying lane width when creating a superelevation section? As far as I can tell SS4 only prompts for a single width for each lane. I&amp;#39;ve got a situation where I need to apply super to a lane and a shoulder using separate criteria in a tie-in area where a lane taper is also occurring. It&amp;#39;s a unique situation, but it would be very beneficial if I could somehow change my super lane width to accommodate that lane taper rather than applying a constant width. Any help would be greatly appreciated. Thanks.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;-Ben&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>