<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://communities.bentley.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><channel><title>Ally Goolabsingh's Communities Activities</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/members/02374269_2d00_6966_2d00_412a_2d00_8494_2d00_aaba71960a94</link><description>Recent activity for people in Ally Goolabsingh's community</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 12</generator><item><title>Ask A Question I</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/achievements/460ac7df-7ccc-4c42-a204-9e05eef3be09</link><pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2021 04:36:48 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:a57a1a00-8ea4-4718-b786-1d39b013abe1</guid><dc:creator /><description>Ask a question in a forum.</description></item><item><title>RAM Structural System- Semirigid Diaphragm with untopped metal deck</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/ram-staad/f/ram-staad-forum/208636/ram-structural-system--semirigid-diaphragm-with-untopped-metal-deck</link><pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2021 20:09:54 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:0e6a2f7b-7d2a-4816-aced-d04a8a367d61</guid><dc:creator>Ally Goolabsingh</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I am currently working on a model with concrete tilt walls and joist girder moment frames (using the virtual joist tables) with an untopped metal deck as my diaphragm. Based on articles I have found on this site (as well as classifications per ASCE7), it is appropriate to analyze this system as a semirigid diaphragm with an effective thickness equal to the deck thickness, Poisson&amp;#39;s Ratio of 0.3, and an Elastic Modulus based on G&amp;#39;.&amp;nbsp; I&amp;nbsp;based the calculation for E&amp;#39; on the web page within this forum tilted &amp;quot;Example Calculating Semirigid Diaphragm E&amp;#39;.&amp;nbsp; Based on the latest deck manufacturer&amp;#39;s publications, the shear stiffness value G&amp;#39; has increased significantly based on changes to the latest versions of IBC and AISI, as well as an overall increase in Fy of the deck.&amp;nbsp; In addition, the value increases significantly when considering a lapped end vs. a butted end condition.&amp;nbsp; Is it still appropriate to consider the system to have a semirigid diaphragm?&amp;nbsp; The load distribution to the frames when comparing psuedo-flexible to semi rigid are significantly different since the deck stiffness increased.&amp;nbsp; Are there any considerations I may be missing?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h1 class="name"&gt;&lt;/h1&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>