<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://communities.bentley.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><channel><title>Benjamin Ankrom's Activities</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/members/04a673a0_2d00_c3e2_2d00_4dd7_2d00_958c_2d00_9d58c06541bf</link><description>Benjamin Ankrom's recent activity</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 12</generator><item><title>Plan and Profile Sheet - Renamed Alignment it is Based On - How to Restore?</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/road___site_design/f/geopak-inroads-mx-openroads-forum/242373/plan-and-profile-sheet---renamed-alignment-it-is-based-on---how-to-restore</link><pubDate>Thu, 02 Mar 2023 21:51:40 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:9fdac345-2d1c-4c13-8f5b-8d4d43aedded</guid><dc:creator>Benjamin Ankrom</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;OpenRoads Designer CE 2021 Release 2 (10.10.21.4)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Hello,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;We made a plan and profile sheet from a&amp;nbsp;geometry file that had a defined horizontal alignment and active vertical profile.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;We later have to change the name of the geometry DGN to match CAD Standards.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the plan and profile sheet, the Design model does not find the old file name. When we double click the red reference and re-attach the geometry DGN (this time with the correct name), the horizontal alignment is restored, but the vertical alignment cannot be found.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Drawing model for the profile, it looks like ORD is still looking for the old DGN name instead of the new one. How do we restore this? Or do we have to re-create the plan and profile sheet from scratch which would take a lot of time?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thanks,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Ben&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img style="max-height:240px;max-width:320px;" src="/resized-image/__size/640x480/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/5922/pastedimage1677793938993v1.png" alt=" " /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Why is Measure Length giving me an inaccurate length?</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/road___site_design/f/geopak-inroads-mx-openroads-forum/219029/why-is-measure-length-giving-me-an-inaccurate-length</link><pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2021 14:37:51 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:a75a8d58-fd00-4586-aa26-a1f43b2be2fb</guid><dc:creator>Benjamin Ankrom</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;ORD 2020 R3 10.09.00.91&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Hello,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I&amp;#39;m running into an issue where my &amp;quot;Measure Length&amp;quot; tool is giving me an incorrect value. I am trying to measure a length of conduit, but it is giving me a length double of what the actual length is. I had it defined as an offset partial off the back of a sidewalk. Has anyone ever run into this before? It&amp;#39;s an issue if I can&amp;#39;t trust the measure tools.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="/resized-image/__size/320x240/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/5922/pastedimage1630679966838v2.png" alt=" " /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thanks!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Ben&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>How do I get a Station Offset report using a DGN with survey points?</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/road___site_design/f/geopak-inroads-mx-openroads-forum/232906/how-do-i-get-a-station-offset-report-using-a-dgn-with-survey-points</link><pubDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2022 20:07:10 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:e9423604-feab-4ff3-ae8b-5eba7069c1b5</guid><dc:creator>Benjamin Ankrom</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;2021 R1 10.10.01.03&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Hello,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I am trying to get a report of the station/offsets of all the survey points we received in the field book file from the surveyor. How do we get a readout of these points?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thanks!!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Ben&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Shifting/Adjusting Cross Section Named Boundaries to a Different Station</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/road___site_design/f/geopak-inroads-mx-openroads-forum/231945/shifting-adjusting-cross-section-named-boundaries-to-a-different-station</link><pubDate>Wed, 29 Jun 2022 16:11:41 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:e64d77b9-7863-462b-82a3-22bd0a58efed</guid><dc:creator>Benjamin Ankrom</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;ORD 10.10.01.03 (2021 R1)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Hello,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I need to move a very specifically placed cross section named boundary&amp;nbsp;from one station to another. Is there a way to reposition the named boundary back to a specific station and keep the same boundary width/height? I&amp;#39;ve found some videos on adjusting the offsets LT/RT at one station, but not changing the station of the named boundary entirely.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thanks!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Ben&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="/resized-image/__size/320x240/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/5922/pastedimage1656518997792v1.png" alt=" " /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>How to get Civil Labeler elevation to stay on a set terrain (instead of active terrain)?</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/road___site_design/f/geopak-inroads-mx-openroads-forum/233258/how-to-get-civil-labeler-elevation-to-stay-on-a-set-terrain-instead-of-active-terrain</link><pubDate>Thu, 28 Jul 2022 17:39:54 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:3100da91-c962-43ab-b4bc-1063700f460c</guid><dc:creator>Benjamin Ankrom</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;ORD 2021 R1 (10.10.01.03)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Hello,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;For the civil labeling, I want the elevation text in the tag to be shown from a specific terrain. Right now, it is just set to whatever terrain is active at the moment, so it switches from one to the other. How do I set this to just go off of one of them?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thanks!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Ben&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="/resized-image/__size/320x240/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/5922/pastedimage1659029883572v3.png" alt=" " /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Shifting/Adjusting Plan View Named Boundaries</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/road___site_design/f/geopak-inroads-mx-openroads-forum/231884/shifting-adjusting-plan-view-named-boundaries</link><pubDate>Tue, 28 Jun 2022 15:58:34 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:136b1ac0-a7f1-4196-83bf-98313ba2549d</guid><dc:creator>Benjamin Ankrom</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;ORD Version 10.10.01.03 (2021 R1)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;We keep running into issues when it comes to adjusting a previously placed named boundary to cover additional area after it has been placed and sheets cut. When we adjust the boundary, all of the text that has been placed in the drawing model shifts. It seems to be because the named boundary in the drawing model itself shifts. Is there a way to prevent this from occurring or otherwise mitigate this issue??&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thanks!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Ben&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Everything in my Corridor has been deleted....?</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/road___site_design/f/geopak-inroads-mx-openroads-forum/220713/everything-in-my-corridor-has-been-deleted</link><pubDate>Wed, 13 Oct 2021 17:28:46 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:7a46aaef-db4a-4ebe-8640-1ef40f652ea0</guid><dc:creator>Benjamin Ankrom</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;ORD 2021 R1 10.01.01.3&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Hello,&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I&amp;#39;ve hit a bit of a terrible situation here... I was working in my corridor file, made a change to one of the templates in the template library,&amp;nbsp;picked the &amp;quot;Synchronize Template&amp;quot; tool, then selected my Corridor handle. ORD then crashed - upon re-opening the file, everything is gone except for the references. I&amp;#39;m puzzled because I&amp;#39;ve re-synced the template library numerous times today with the same file... the action I was taking immediately before the crash was updating the component display rules on a curb component.&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;Has anyone ran into catastrophic data loss before and how to you mitigate that? We are working with ProjectWise Share, so we do not have automatic backups with our IT department. It&amp;#39;s alarming that some normal ORD operations can suddenly just wipe out a lot of work for some unknown reason. Any tips or advice here would be appreciated.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thanks,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Ben&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>OpenRoads Designer - Exclude Existing Pavement from Cut Area for Earthwork Calculations</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/road___site_design/f/geopak-inroads-mx-openroads-forum/218889/openroads-designer---exclude-existing-pavement-from-cut-area-for-earthwork-calculations</link><pubDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2021 03:21:29 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:eba2ee5a-4451-4a24-9d31-5498ef2110bb</guid><dc:creator>Benjamin Ankrom</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;OpenRoads 2020 R3 10.09.00.91&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Hello,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I am trying to run earthwork on my proposed corridor. I have the existing pavement modeled in a separate DGN. Is there a way to tell the earthwork analysis to exclude the existing pavement from the excavation area? The pavement removal is a separate pay item, so I do not want the green end area for the excavation inside of the existing pavement area. Thanks!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Ben&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="/resized-image/__size/320x240/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/5922/pastedimage1630466573339v1.png" alt=" " /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Model Interior Grading of Roundabout</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/road___site_design/f/geopak-inroads-mx-openroads-forum/223305/model-interior-grading-of-roundabout</link><pubDate>Fri, 10 Dec 2021 21:59:16 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:6e260fe6-4445-4d4e-b425-bb2f7a6f2fbb</guid><dc:creator>Benjamin Ankrom</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;ORD 2021 R1 10.10.01.03&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Hello,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I am trying to model the interior grassed area of a roundabout. I want to have my grading end condition coming off the back of my truck aprons to tie into themselves. What combination of constraints should I use in my template to accomplish this? Do I need to define a Target Alias for this?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thanks!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Ben&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="/resized-image/__size/320x240/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/5922/pastedimage1639173520209v1.png" alt=" " /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Editing Contours in ORD</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/road___site_design/f/geopak-inroads-mx-openroads-forum/222156/editing-contours-in-ord</link><pubDate>Mon, 15 Nov 2021 18:47:27 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:670f79ca-a712-4f03-8c54-bbe0fca193b9</guid><dc:creator>Benjamin Ankrom</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;ORD 2021 R1 10.10.01.03&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Hello,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Is there a way to edit the contour linework of a proposed terrain model created from corridors? I understand that ideally the proposed model will take care of this and they are &amp;quot;calculated features&amp;quot;, but unfortunately we don&amp;#39;t have a perfect model and there&amp;#39;s some weird things the proposed contours are doing that I want to modify without getting into the weeds on modeling. In Geopak, we would be able to display the contours and they would come in as drawing elements that could be revised if necessary.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thanks!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Ben&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Existing PGL elevations in Cross Section drawing models...?</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/communities/user_communities/ohio_dot__consultants/f/odot---general-openroads/221990/existing-pgl-elevations-in-cross-section-drawing-models</link><pubDate>Wed, 10 Nov 2021 22:02:04 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:3c3fa2ef-de71-469e-b47c-26aff79e1ad6</guid><dc:creator>Benjamin Ankrom</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;ORD 2021 R1 10.10.01.03&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Hello,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Is there a way to get the existing profile grade elevation to show up along with the proposed in cross section drawing models? The &amp;quot;Drawing Model Annotation&amp;quot; annotates the station and proposed profile grade elevation. I looked through the cross section sheets guide on the Wiki but didn&amp;#39;t see this mentioned unless I&amp;#39;m mistaken.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thanks!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Ben&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;img height="205" src="/resized-image/__size/320x240/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/343610/pastedimage1636581724810v1.png" width="278" alt=" " /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Reference Dialog only accessible via Flyout...?</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/road___site_design/f/geopak-inroads-mx-openroads-forum/221464/reference-dialog-only-accessible-via-flyout</link><pubDate>Fri, 29 Oct 2021 12:26:31 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:e46e02ce-5ae3-4645-9227-397069a8e40e</guid><dc:creator>Benjamin Ankrom</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;ORD&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;2021 R1&amp;nbsp; 10.10.01.03&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Hello,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I&amp;#39;m trying to open my references dialog to control my reference display... however when I click my References icon nothing happens. I can only see my references by typing in &amp;quot;reference&amp;quot; into the search ribbon and clicking &amp;quot;References Flyout&amp;quot;, but the dialog is docked to my toolbar and if I click off, the dialog disappears. Not sure what I can try to get my reference dialog back so I can move it around, off to the side somewhere?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thanks!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Ben&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>End Condition Tie Down where pavement will be removed?</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/road___site_design/f/geopak-inroads-mx-openroads-forum/220585/end-condition-tie-down-where-pavement-will-be-removed</link><pubDate>Mon, 11 Oct 2021 15:05:35 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:c97af1b5-69dd-4948-8112-3be971ec07fe</guid><dc:creator>Benjamin Ankrom</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;ORD 2021 R1 10.01.03.1&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;What would be the best way to model a grading tie-down where the intercept surface is currently existing pavement that will be removed and re-graded? At the moment, my model is showing a cut slope that would tie into an existing on-ramp, but the on-ramp is being removed and the ground re-graded to drain. Should I create a new terrain in the area where the pavement will be removed? Thanks!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img height="193" src="/resized-image/__size/320x240/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/5922/pastedimage1633964774789v1.png" width="671" alt=" " /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Draping an Aerial Drawing onto existing topo?</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/road___site_design/f/geopak-inroads-mx-openroads-forum/220110/draping-an-aerial-drawing-onto-existing-topo</link><pubDate>Tue, 28 Sep 2021 19:59:17 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:f7590d98-1464-46d0-bd61-7da86dcc5fbe</guid><dc:creator>Benjamin Ankrom</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;ORD 2021 R1 10.10.01.03&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Hello,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I am wondering how to drape an aerial basemap onto an existing terrain model so that we can better visualize the proposed design in relation to what&amp;#39;s in the field? We have an aerial basemap with raster images on a default level in the same coordinate system as the surveyed topo.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thanks!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Ben&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Horizontal/Vertical Temporary Dimension Lines not working</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/communities/user_communities/ohio_dot__consultants/f/odot---general-openroads/220113/horizontal-vertical-temporary-dimension-lines-not-working</link><pubDate>Tue, 28 Sep 2021 21:37:17 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:4f85fc0a-9232-4476-8016-05c2c7ad6aa9</guid><dc:creator>Benjamin Ankrom</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;ORD 10.10.01.03&amp;nbsp; (2021 R1)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Has anyone&amp;nbsp;run into&amp;nbsp;the horizontal or vertical temporary dimensions&amp;nbsp;not working in XS view while in a KM file? When I select the tool, I see a brief dimension pop on the screen and then immediately disappear. The error at the bottom of ORD says &amp;quot;No Template Drop Defined&amp;quot;.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thanks!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Ben&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>