<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://communities.bentley.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><channel><title>Ceasar Gottlieb's Activities</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/members/07d77028_2d00_660c_2d00_4383_2d00_a062_2d00_edb5d3bd3445</link><description>Ceasar Gottlieb's recent activity</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 12</generator><item><title>Verifying Fatigue Stresses in Leap Bridge Steel</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/bridge_design___engineering/f/bridgemaster-lars-leap-openbridge-rm-forum/227522/verifying-fatigue-stresses-in-leap-bridge-steel</link><pubDate>Thu, 24 Mar 2022 16:56:12 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:1e351579-2019-497f-b5ed-3e567f788c51</guid><dc:creator>Benji Michael Chit Khin</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi I have a question regarding Fatigue stresses in Leap Bridge Steel.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I have several locations along the girder that fatigue is the controlling design.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Based on the calculations reported, it appears that Leap Steel is using non composite properties to calculate the fatigue stress rather than the composite properties which is causing a higher stress to be reported than it should. The girder itself is being reported as composite and has the composite values calculated correctly.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I saw a similar question was posted about this a few years ago and wondering if this has been resolved?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thanks&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Michael&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Software exception error</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/bridge_design___engineering/f/bridgemaster-lars-leap-openbridge-rm-forum/229333/software-exception-error</link><pubDate>Wed, 04 May 2022 16:43:20 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:70202fae-2326-4222-97c8-c22ef8453ca0</guid><dc:creator>Diego Veloso</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hello there, I&amp;#39;m receiving an error when trying to model stiffeners with an offset from bottom. The error and the stiffners that I&amp;#39;m aiming to model is shown.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="/resized-image/__size/320x240/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/5930/pastedimage1651682550503v1.png" alt=" " /&gt;&lt;img src="/resized-image/__size/320x240/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/5930/pastedimage1651682582217v2.png" alt=" " /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thanks&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Error opening file [...\Route_H_OBM-seed3d-Imperial.dgn] = (0x13014)</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/bridge_design___engineering/f/bridgemaster-lars-leap-openbridge-rm-forum/227887/error-opening-file-route_h_obm-seed3d-imperial-dgn-0x13014</link><pubDate>Fri, 01 Apr 2022 18:45:04 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:533170c1-9579-40cf-b0e6-3a85071caf8b</guid><dc:creator>Josh Miller</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I get the&amp;nbsp;above error when trying to start an OBD project off in Projectwise. I found a document the Iowa DOT uses for setting up in bridges and followed that after my first failure. Unfortunately, I continue to get errors. the latest error is what is in the subject. Can anyone provide some guidance on what I should be doing to set projects up?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Some additional information... I get to OBM an then the error occurs.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;TIA&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Josh&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>