<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://communities.bentley.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><channel><title>Mary  Miranda's Activities</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/members/0928c858_2d00_6db2_2d00_42cd_2d00_88bc_2d00_931e5156cf8d</link><description>Mary  Miranda's recent activity</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 12</generator><item><title>Steel + Long Reinf (n=n) vs. Steel + Long Reinf (n=3n) section property</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/bridge_design___engineering/f/bridgemaster-lars-leap-openbridge-rm-forum/168342/steel-long-reinf-n-n-vs-steel-long-reinf-n-3n-section-property</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2018 20:06:24 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:0dbe8a3b-8d27-4da6-80c4-ad8dfaaf67c9</guid><dc:creator>Dawn Esche</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;In my composite steel girder run I notice the&amp;nbsp;MOI in the negative bending region where the steel member and the reinforcing steel are the only parts contributing to the property that the 3N moment of inertia is different than the N moment of inertia.&amp;nbsp; I think N should be 1 since E of the girder steel is the same as E of the reinforcing steel (N = 29000/29000).&amp;nbsp; So why would the properties for Steel+Long Reinf (n=n) and Steel + Long Reinf (n=3n) be different?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>