<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://communities.bentley.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><channel><title>Sean Smith's Activities</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/members/0c6440b5_2d00_71fd_2d00_4592_2d00_b764_2d00_ccfa53bbe414</link><description>Sean Smith's recent activity</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 12</generator><item><title>RAM Concept - Provide Various UI Enhancements</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/ram-staad/i/ram-concept/ram-concept---provide-various-ui-enhancements</link><pubDate>Thu, 24 Feb 2022 17:28:12 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:b41b687d-1dc2-4506-8aca-96bdf3cc7c15</guid><dc:creator>Sean Smith</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Below are several UI enhancements that would improve modeling efficiency and overall user experience. There may be additional items, but these are the ones that seem to have the biggest impact to productivity.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Allow the user to choose the default toggle for the Selection Tool vs Utility Tool.
&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;It becomes tedious and time-consuming changing the Selection Tool to the Utility Tool on every plan for every session.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;The program currently remembers object settings and snap toggles, and it would be extremely helpful if the program remembered the toggle for the Selection/Utility Tool as well.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Add the ability to apply Appearance Settings to multiple plans and perspectives simultaneously.
&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Currently, the user must open a plan or perspective, go to the Appearance Settings dialog box, select the scheme, press &amp;quot;OK&amp;quot;, and repeat for every plan and perspective.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;This is extremely time-consuming and could be replaced with a dialog box that would allow the user to select multiple plans &amp;amp; perspectives and apply the same scheme to the selected views simultaneously.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Provide a dialog box for setting custom keyboard shortcuts for any of the program functions.
&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Currently, there are some shortcuts that deviate from those that typical programs use. For example, Ctrl+A in most programs selects every onscreen object that can be selected (even typing this out, pressing Ctrl+A selects all of the text). However, Ctrl+A in Concept performs the Calc All function. It would be helpful if users could change this to select all and set a different shortcut for Calc All.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Many functions are missing a keyboard shortcut altogether, such as Generate Strips, Generate Program Tendons, Calc Partial (which I use instead of Calc All 100% of the time now), and Calc Load History Deflections. Giving users the ability to set keyboard shortcuts for any functions would greatly improve efficiency when working with this program.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Change the order of load cases and load combos in the Criteria &amp;gt; Loadings and &amp;gt; Load Combos views to match the order in the Report Sections pane.
&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Currently, the order in the Criteria views doesn&amp;#39;t match the order under Report Sections and seems to be based on either the order in which custom Loadings and Load Combos were added or some other arbitrary sorting criteria.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Users need the ability to rearrange Loadings and Load Combinations in a logical order that fits the project&amp;#39;s needs, so reordering these in the Report Sections pane should cause them to be reordered in the same way in their respective Criteria views.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Allow users to sort materials under Criteria &amp;gt; Materials
&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Adding a material currently places it at the end of the list instead of sorting it alphanumerically by property name.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Additionally, selecting the headings for each category under Criteria &amp;gt; Materials just selects that column. There should be a control on each heading, such as arrow buttons, to sort the entries in that column alphanumerically.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Provide better methods for selecting and deselecting objects.
&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Programs such as SAFE and ADAPT Floor Pro allow users to select and deselect objects by object type or by specific object properties. RAM Concept currently only allows you to deselect by object type using the Selection Filter, but it needs to include more selection/deselection options so users can fine-tune their selections.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Most engineering applications allow users to quickly deselect all objects by pressing the Esc key, but Concept requires you to select empty space in order to deselect. Pressing the Esc key should deselect objects similar to other applications.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Add an indicator on the Status Bar that shows the number of objects currently selected.
&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Similar to Revit, this would allow users to quickly see how many objects have been selected, which would be useful if there are multiple overlapping objects.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Although the Selection Filter dialog box indicates number of objects selected, user feedback in our organization has shown that this is an inefficient way to view current object selection, and an indicator on the Status Bar showing total number of selected objects would be desired as well.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Add a tool for dimensioning angles.
&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Currently, the only way to measure angles is by drawing a Span Segment, using the Orient Span Cross Section tool, opening the Selection Properties, and viewing the Skew Angles. This is an extremely inefficient way to dimension angles and doesn&amp;#39;t display the angle on plan when working in the program or printing reports.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;A tool for dimensioning angles would be a much better way to calculate angles and could actually be displayed on plan.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;I had mentioned this in a previous post, but I have reiterated it here since it is relevant to this topic as well.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Provide a button to set the Print Scale to &amp;quot;Same as Print Area&amp;quot;.
&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;The Print Area is a useful tool, but it is currently disconnected from the Print Scale dialog box, so plans may still print across multiple pages depending on the Print Scale.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Adding a button to the Print Scale dialog box for &amp;quot;Same as Print Area&amp;quot; would allow users to quickly scale their plans for printing instead of having to repeatedly adjust the scale and preview the window to ensure the Print Area fits on a single page.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Provide a simpler method for rotating perspective views.
&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Although RAM Concept allows users to pan on perspective views by pressing the mouse wheel button, there doesn&amp;#39;t appear to be a way to quickly rotate the view without having to press the &amp;quot;Rotate about X and Y axes&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;Rotate about Z axis&amp;quot; buttons.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Most engineering applications will allow users to rotate 3D views by using a combination of keyboard and mouse inputs, such as Shift + mouse wheel button, Ctrl + mouse wheel button, Shift + left mouse button, or Ctrl + left mouse button. RAM Concept should implement similar keyboard + mouse controls as well for the &amp;quot;Rotate about X and Y axes&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;Rotate about Z axis&amp;quot; functions.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;</description></item><item><title>RAM Concept - Dimensioning Angles</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/ram-staad/i/ram-concept/ram-concept---dimensioning-angles</link><pubDate>Fri, 10 Sep 2021 16:55:49 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:1b395a2f-22de-4fd5-bce4-ec4126880543</guid><dc:creator>Sean Smith</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;It would be helpful to have the ability to dimension angles, especially when working with unusual slab geometry and radial or skewed grids.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Idea Machine I</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/achievements/f09a2649-3fee-4b79-998e-82ce31585d04</link><pubDate>Mon, 04 Oct 2021 18:01:14 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:50063fb1-a3a9-4dc6-9d91-bd7bd9e05ce5</guid><dc:creator /><description>Share 5 ideas with the community</description></item><item><title>RAM Concept - Display Tendon Radius Value for Generated &amp;amp; Manual Tendons</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/ram-staad/i/ram-concept/ram-concept---display-tendon-radius-value-for-generated-manual-tendons</link><pubDate>Mon, 04 Oct 2021 17:59:21 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:74757953-f4ba-4507-887c-6c2b557a836a</guid><dc:creator>Sean Smith</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;When debugging a model and clearing out warnings, fixing the &amp;quot;Tendon radius less than minimum allowed&amp;quot; warning can be a sizeable effort since multiple iterations of adjusting the tendon profile and recalculating the design are usually required. It would be helpful to have the ability display the controlling tendon radius under Visible Objects &amp;gt; Tendons &amp;gt; Generated/Manual Latitude/Longitude Tendon in order to quickly view the actual values on plan instead of hovering over each entry in the Warnings and Errors pane. See marked up screenshots below for clarification on what this could look like.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Taking it one step further, another helpful feature would be an option for automatically raising/lowering the selected parametric tendon profile polylines or manual tendon profile points to match the minimum tendon radius. Alternatively, the warning could indicate the required change in tendon profile elevation to achieve the minimum tendon radius if possible. I&amp;#39;m not sure how the program is actually calculating the tendon radius, but these are just some ideas on how to streamline the design process.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="/resized-image/__size/320x240/__key/telligent-ideas/fc54a522-9edc-451d-a8f5-76cbbbd001be/RAM-Concept-_2D00_-Tendon-Radius-Warning.png" alt=" " /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="/resized-image/__size/320x240/__key/telligent-ideas/fc54a522-9edc-451d-a8f5-76cbbbd001be/RAM-Concept-_2D00_-Tendon-Radius-Display.png" alt=" " /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>RAM SS - &amp;quot;Gravity Column&amp;quot; Loads report vs Foundation Loads &amp;gt; &amp;quot;Gravity Forces from RAM Concrete&amp;quot; report for drilled pier loading</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/ram-staad/f/ram-staad-forum/217869/ram-ss---gravity-column-loads-report-vs-foundation-loads-gravity-forces-from-ram-concrete-report-for-drilled-pier-loading</link><pubDate>Mon, 09 Aug 2021 15:58:18 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:dfd7bfb2-c649-4a82-a2db-66457c57848c</guid><dc:creator>Sean Smith</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Please see specific questions at the end of this post. As an overview of the issue, I would like some clarification on where the loads in the &amp;quot;Gravity Column Loads&amp;quot; and the Foundation Loads &amp;gt; &amp;quot;Gravity Forces from RAM Concrete&amp;quot; reports within RAM Manager are coming from and in what context each of these reports should be used. My intent is to take base reactions from RAM SS to design drilled piers under concrete gravity columns and walls, but there seems to be a large discrepancy in the base reactions between these reports.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Section 6.5 of the RAM Manager manual (v17.02) hints that the &amp;quot;Gravity Column Loads&amp;quot; report contains column loads coming from RAM Steel Column, however the loads are being reported even for concrete gravity columns. Section 6.8 of the manual says that the &amp;quot;Gravity Forces from RAM Concrete&amp;quot; report includes forces on both gravity and lateral concrete members. The table below contains the report outputs for column 85 in the attached model (RAMSS_PierLoadingClarification.zip sent via secure file upload), which represents a portion of a drilled pier under a gravity wall. In the screenshots below, the reactions from RAM Concrete &amp;gt; Concrete Analysis mode &amp;gt; Vertical Reactions seem to match the &amp;quot;Gravity Forces from RAM Concrete&amp;quot; report, but it still isn&amp;#39;t clear if these are the correct forces or if the &amp;quot;Gravity Column Loads&amp;quot; report should be used instead.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;table&gt;
&lt;tbody&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;td&gt;RAM Manager Report&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;Dead Load (kips)&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;Unreducible Live Load (kips)&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;td&gt;Gravity Column Loads&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;87.30&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;22.59&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;td&gt;Gravity Forces from RAM Concrete&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;135.27&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;
&lt;p&gt;33.57&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;/tbody&gt;
&lt;/table&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img alt=" " src="/resized-image/__size/320x240/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/5932/4403.pastedimage1628522947249v5.png" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img alt=" " src="/resized-image/__size/320x240/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/5932/7127.pastedimage1628523317711v6.png" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img alt=" " src="/resized-image/__size/320x240/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/5932/7127.pastedimage1628523355481v7.png" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Taking all of this information into consideration, I have the following questions:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ol&gt;
&lt;li&gt;How are these reports calculating forces? (e.g. tributary areas, reactions from FEM calculations, or some other approach)&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Is the &amp;quot;Gravity Column Loads&amp;quot; report only to be used for steel columns?&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Are either of these reports supposed to be used only for statically determinate systems, or do either of them apply to indeterminate systems with beam/slab/wall continuity as is the case in the example model?&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Which of these reports would be considered correct for getting drilled pier loads in the context of the example pier?&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ol&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Please let me know if you need me to provide more information on this issue. Any additional guidance on how these reports work or the preferred method for gathering base reactions for drilled pier design would be greatly appreciated as well.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RAM Concept, RAM SS, and RAM Elements - ACI 318-19</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/ram-staad/f/ram-staad-forum/215317/ram-concept-ram-ss-and-ram-elements---aci-318-19</link><pubDate>Tue, 15 Jun 2021 14:36:42 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:4ff0656c-7561-4c47-98c9-993b0753d263</guid><dc:creator>Sean Smith</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Are there plans to include ACI 318-19 provisions in any&amp;nbsp;upcoming releases for the RAM programs? If so, is there an ETA on this? Our AHJ will be adopting IBC 2021 in a few months,&amp;nbsp;but we need to have the ability to start designing concrete structures in these programs using ACI 318-19, which is referenced by IBC 2021. Thanks!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RAM Concept - Add &amp;quot;Help&amp;quot; button to dialog boxes similar to RAM SS</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/ram-staad/i/ram-concept/ram-concept---add-help-button-to-dialog-boxes-similar-to-ram-ss</link><pubDate>Tue, 08 Jun 2021 16:55:18 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:178542d0-2417-49dd-9b64-e0a3f4dc29be</guid><dc:creator>Sean Smith</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;As the title implies, it would be helpful if dialog boxes within RAM Concept had a &amp;quot;Help&amp;quot; button that takes you to the section of the help file describing the various&amp;nbsp;settings in the dialog box. This feature is already present in RAM SS, and it would greatly improve user experience if this feature was available in RAM Concept as well.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Here&amp;#39;s an example of what it looks like in RAM SS:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="/resized-image/__size/320x240/__key/telligent-ideas/fc54a522-9edc-451d-a8f5-76cbbbd001be/pastedimage1623171209594v1.png" alt=" " /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>RAM Concept - Elevation views of tendons</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/ram-staad/i/ram-concept/ram-concept---elevation-views-of-tendons</link><pubDate>Sun, 23 May 2021 19:10:52 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:df014976-cd2e-4d56-88ce-acf8afbe0a1b</guid><dc:creator>Sean Smith</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;In RAM Concept, it would be helpful to have the ability to inspect generated tendons and inspect/update manual tendons&amp;nbsp;using elevation views of the tendon profiles. This feature would be&amp;nbsp;similar to the functionality&amp;nbsp;provided by&amp;nbsp;ADAPT Floor-Pro and SAFE (CSIAmerica). Tendon elevation views would make it easier to resolve warnings and errors, such as tendon radius less than the minimum allowable,&amp;nbsp;tendon out of slab, and&amp;nbsp;conflicting profiles. As a secondary benefit, tendon elevations could also be used to view balanced load and identify issues with span polylines incorrectly modeled as support polylines&amp;nbsp;or vice versa.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>What If...</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/achievements/431b6499-29c0-4b75-9a11-0f8ab01b8e9b</link><pubDate>Sun, 27 Dec 2020 21:00:31 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:017ca741-144a-44d1-b851-84cd32c28f21</guid><dc:creator /><description>Share an idea with the community</description></item><item><title>RAM Concept - Ability to lock mesh nodes and/or elements</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/ram-staad/i/ram-concept/ram-concept---ability-to-lock-mesh-nodes-and-or-elements</link><pubDate>Sun, 27 Dec 2020 21:00:30 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:23c4fdba-4455-41e4-b788-f3ccf43def5e</guid><dc:creator>Sean Smith</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;In RAM Concept, it would be helpful to have the ability to lock&amp;nbsp;specific nodes or elements so that they don&amp;#39;t get reset when you regenerate your mesh. This would be particularly useful in areas where unusual geometry or column transfer loads occur.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;For example: I have a fairly large floor plan where some unusual geometry is present, and every time the mesh needs to be regenerated, I must stretch a specific slab/wall node back into alignment with the rest of the wall (circled in red below). This is the result of a beam edge that&amp;#39;s slightly&amp;nbsp;offset from&amp;nbsp;the wall centerline due to architectural constraints (circled in green below). If the slab/wall node or elements could be locked, this would save time when other adjustments are made throughout the model resulting in the mesh needing to be regenerated.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Before:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img alt=" " src="/resized-image/__size/320x240/__key/telligent-ideas/fc54a522-9edc-451d-a8f5-76cbbbd001be/mesh_5F00_before.png" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;After:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img alt=" " src="/resized-image/__size/320x240/__key/telligent-ideas/fc54a522-9edc-451d-a8f5-76cbbbd001be/mesh_5F00_after.png" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Edit: Here&amp;#39;s what the problem area looks like on the Mesh Input layer for reference:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="/resized-image/__size/320x240/__key/telligent-ideas/fc54a522-9edc-451d-a8f5-76cbbbd001be/mesh_5F00_input.png" alt=" " /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Ask A Question I</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/achievements/460ac7df-7ccc-4c42-a204-9e05eef3be09</link><pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2020 05:32:06 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:3c832fa0-9df7-4b3b-a6af-f800955c8008</guid><dc:creator /><description>Ask a question in a forum.</description></item><item><title>RAM Concept - Cross-section trimming of girders at joists</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/ram-staad/f/ram-staad-forum/204560/ram-concept---cross-section-trimming-of-girders-at-joists</link><pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2020 16:05:18 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:a88c3ab1-5620-48f5-ac94-85773f626ed9</guid><dc:creator>Sean Smith</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Is there a way to prevent&amp;nbsp;RAM Concept from including joist spans in the cross-section trimming for a girder? Whenever this occurs, it overestimates the capacity of the section and potentially results in an unrealistic reinforcement design.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;For example, a girder cross-section is being cut across the joist shown below. Trimming is set as &amp;quot;T or L&amp;quot;, but the full depth of the joist is being included across the tributary width of the design strip.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="/resized-image/__size/320x240/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/5932/8156.pastedimage1602775349722v1.png" alt=" " /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="/resized-image/__size/320x240/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/5932/6507.pastedimage1602775390052v2.png" alt=" " /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The stirrups for the girder end up varying in width in this area. Some of them even protrude out of the beam and into the space below the slab soffit.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="/resized-image/__size/320x240/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/5932/0677.pastedimage1602776737447v4.png" alt=" " /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Here is the file for the model:&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="/cfs-file/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/5932/RSS_5F00_to_5F00_Concept_2D00_LVL2.zip"&gt;/cfs-file/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/5932/RSS_5F00_to_5F00_Concept_2D00_LVL2.zip&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>