<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://communities.bentley.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><channel><title>Berk Demir's Activities</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/members/0ff5d881_2d00_dcf3_2d00_446f_2d00_95f1_2d00_c414635fb9ef</link><description>Berk Demir's recent activity</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 12</generator><item><title>Segmental tunnel lining</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/geotech-analysis/f/forum/198112/segmental-tunnel-lining</link><pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2020 12:15:46 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:95a050c5-dc6b-4547-ba01-861a019c4c22</guid><dc:creator>Nadeem Khan</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://communities.bentley.com/cfs-file/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/343671/Plate-properties.pdf"&gt;communities.bentley.com/.../Plate-properties.pdf&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Dear Sirs,&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I am looking at the modelling of the segmental lining in Plaxis 2D.&amp;nbsp; The dilemma I am facing is that should I use the reduced second moment of inertia&amp;nbsp; (I effective) considering the number of segments (as proposed by Duddeck and Erdmann) or full stiffness without considering the joints.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Also, whilst considering reduced stiffness (with I effective), the plate thickness (d) also reduces in Plaxis plate properties.&amp;nbsp; How this should be accommodated during the interpretation of results?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Many thanks.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Nadeem&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Moment Concentration at corner of structure in plaxis 2D</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/geotech-analysis/f/forum/204720/moment-concentration-at-corner-of-structure-in-plaxis-2d</link><pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2020 06:50:29 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:d1f5b359-25a7-4303-a2ae-8fdc3755a525</guid><dc:creator>Ahmad Rahmani</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi&lt;br /&gt;When i activate structure in my model (Stage Construction) I got moment concentration at corner point (90 deg)...it seems in reality it shouldn&amp;#39;t be in this way.any one has any idea or solution&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="/resized-image/__size/320x240/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/343671/2021.jpg" alt=" " /&gt;&lt;img src="/resized-image/__size/320x240/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/343671/1007.jpg" alt=" " /&gt;&lt;img src="/resized-image/__size/320x240/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/343671/3.jpg" alt=" " /&gt;&lt;img src="/resized-image/__size/320x240/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/343671/4.jpg" alt=" " /&gt;?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Modelling a raft foundation as plate and volume element in Plaxis 3D?</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/geotech-analysis/f/forum/200041/modelling-a-raft-foundation-as-plate-and-volume-element-in-plaxis-3d</link><pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2020 19:34:26 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:8308a7a7-e292-429f-9eed-dd3027c97742</guid><dc:creator>Abdirahman Yasin</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Dear All,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Which approach is more accurate to model a raft foundation? Is it by using plate elements or volume elements?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Mesh Output File not Found</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/geotech-analysis/f/forum/197013/mesh-output-file-not-found</link><pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2020 15:33:46 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:e1e187c5-2704-4cc5-ab49-47de5355dee6</guid><dc:creator>Berk Demir</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Since there is no information on this error, I think it would be nice to keep it on the internet: &amp;quot;Meshing failed with the following error: Mesh output file not found&amp;quot; error is really bothering. The reason of this error is unknown to me, so the answer.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;For my current tunnel model, the inclusion of bolts (emb. beam) seems to cause the problem.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Phi/C Reduction analysis with structure elements</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/geotech-analysis/f/forum/206014/phi-c-reduction-analysis-with-structure-elements</link><pubDate>Sun, 15 Nov 2020 06:09:21 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:6231b55b-5ca0-4cfb-a8e6-186f7681ac80</guid><dc:creator>Ahmad Rahmani</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;When performing safety analysis to check FOS of a anchored excavation (with diaphragm wall piles for example),via Pfi/C reduction method, if we check the force or moment in structure elements its considerably high and is far beyond capacity of structure.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;anyone has any idea is it wrong or not?&lt;br /&gt;should we introduce elasto-plastic structure element&amp;nbsp; for safety analysis as a solution?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Importing 3DM file</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/geotech-analysis/f/forum/210289/importing-3dm-file</link><pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2021 16:04:22 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:bb98b254-fbc2-4adb-a068-6d16cdbb2393</guid><dc:creator>Arpit Mathur</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Can I import a geometry from Rhinos to Plaxis 3D. The format i received is 3DM.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thanks&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Diaphragm wall movement due to reduction of stiffness</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/geotech-analysis/f/forum/209838/diaphragm-wall-movement-due-to-reduction-of-stiffness</link><pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2021 03:37:16 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:3b641126-4b9e-41d3-9dfc-e562e1fbcec5</guid><dc:creator>Feng Ren</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I tried to model the long-term behavior of diaphragm movement by reducing its stiffness EI to 0.6EI for example. However, the results showed there is almost no change. The diaphragm wall in the model was a cantilever wall and modelled using plate elements. If I further reduce the long-term stiffness to 0.3EI, the model responds to the change and has larger movement. it seems that the model behaved unexpectedly. Can anyone please help with this?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;More information can be provided if required.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Regards,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Feng&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>definition of pref</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/geotech-analysis/f/forum/209254/definition-of-pref</link><pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2021 17:16:37 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:24e6c764-8023-49ee-8971-c33729b5bf1d</guid><dc:creator>Baptiste LAROCHE</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hello,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;in general geotechnics, p is the average stress (or octaedric stress) and p = (sigma 1 + sigma 2 + sigma 3) / 3&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the HSM model, can you confirm that pref is the average stress in the middle of the concerned layer ?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thus pref = (sigma 1 + sigma 2 + sigma 3) / 3 ?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thank you in advance.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Baptiste Laroche&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Validation of oedometer test</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/geotech-analysis/f/forum/195924/validation-of-oedometer-test</link><pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2020 12:06:06 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:ff0c114e-7770-452e-b8ec-1ab2bdc4a479</guid><dc:creator>Elena P.</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hello,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;My problem concerns the validation of oedometer tests.&lt;br /&gt;I run some incremental loading oedometer tests on medium stiff clays and simulated them in Plaxis using different soil models (SSC, hardening soil, MCC).&lt;br /&gt;I followed the procedure explained at page 192 of the Material Models Manual and considered a point on the top.&lt;br /&gt;The final compression curve (stress - void ratio) matches quite well with the laboratory curve, but the entire simulated curve is shifted downwards.&lt;br /&gt;The first load step, when simulated in Plaxis, returns much higher deformation than the laboratory results. &lt;br /&gt;Modifying&amp;nbsp;the soil model or the&amp;nbsp;stiffness values&amp;nbsp;or the preconsolidation stress does not solve the problem.&lt;br /&gt;Another publication shows the same offset of the compression curve (Asad, 2016, Prediction of One-Dimensional Compression Test using Finite Elements Model).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I wander why this happens.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thanks&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img height="250" src="/resized-image/__size/640x480/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/343671/pastedimage1587470567465v2.png" width="358" alt=" " /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Simulating geotextile embedded collumns using embedded beam rows and drains in PLAXIS 2D</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/geotech-analysis/f/forum/208554/simulating-geotextile-embedded-collumns-using-embedded-beam-rows-and-drains-in-plaxis-2d</link><pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2021 11:58:32 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:885a2935-9c56-487d-88d4-8576cc588434</guid><dc:creator>Kimberly M&amp;#246;ller</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi everyone,&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;at the moment I try to simulate an embankment founded on GEC (geotextile embedded collumns) and a bridge foundation. For that problem I used embedded beam rows acting as piles. As the material in the GECs is way more permeable than the clay layer I want to add drains to simulate the draining behavoir these GECs obtain.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Calculating the system without drains works. As soon as I try to add all the drains the calculation ends at some point (most likely in the beginning, Phase 2/3) saying the determinante is zero.&amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;Some calculations I even stopped because P excess reached enormously high values (~800). Adding only some drains works as well (see picture below), but not adding all of them.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;As the drains should improve the system I don&amp;#39;t know what my mistake is. I would be really happy about every tip I can get. (clay is calulated as undraind and with SSC)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Best regrads&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Kimberly&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="/resized-image/__size/320x240/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/343671/pastedimage1610970804690v1.png" alt=" " /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Convergence-Confinement method application in plaxis</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/geotech-analysis/f/forum/208293/convergence-confinement-method-application-in-plaxis</link><pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2021 06:49:21 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:bfea1291-92aa-422f-985b-d50aa7c2495f</guid><dc:creator>Ahmad Rahmani</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi&lt;br /&gt;Im afraid if anyone could help me to use confinement convergence method in plaxis?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Im looking forward to find how to calculate beta value.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="/resized-image/__size/320x240/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/343671/pastedimage1610434378719v1.png" alt=" " /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Output force in the axially loaded embedded beam row as a pile in plaxis 2D</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/geotech-analysis/f/forum/208101/output-force-in-the-axially-loaded-embedded-beam-row-as-a-pile-in-plaxis-2d</link><pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2021 18:14:31 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:a047fa56-0b8c-4a01-a3a8-ec86515fc60b</guid><dc:creator>Nitharshan</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi all,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I designed a axially loaded pile system (total length = 10m)&amp;nbsp; with properties shown and applied line load 100 kN/m.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="/resized-image/__size/320x240/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/343671/pastedimage1609954735054v1.png" alt=" " /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The results are shown below.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="/resized-image/__size/320x240/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/343671/pastedimage1609955004542v2.png" alt=" " /&gt;&lt;img src="/resized-image/__size/320x240/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/343671/pastedimage1609955060793v3.png" alt=" " /&gt;&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;i need some clarifications&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;01) Normally base resistance comes into action once skin friction dissipates but the results shows the base resistance, what is the reason?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;02) Applied loading is 200 kN and slef-weight like 47.112 kN, which is get from the skin friction {(0.5x2.7x12.12x2) + (10-2.7)x12.12x2)} and base friction (24.71 x 2). but axial force showing different value, please explain how axial force output is calculated and shown?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thanks,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>How can I model a hinge between two beams?</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/geotech-analysis/f/forum/208096/how-can-i-model-a-hinge-between-two-beams</link><pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2021 16:43:23 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:689a7d0b-f314-4007-8bc1-78953c4bcdef</guid><dc:creator>Jeremy Kuelling</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I want to model hinges at the end of a beam which is connected to several other beams. How can I do that in Plaxis 3D?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thanks for your help!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Validation</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/geotech-analysis/f/forum/207542/validation</link><pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2020 09:26:55 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:4c36f3dc-61e4-4872-8038-350a6d9090e1</guid><dc:creator>Christian Olsen</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Where&amp;nbsp;are the previous files you could download to check and validate that plaxis worked on your PC. There where many different files in the past - but I can not find any now?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;there where for example:&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Validation-Bearing-capacity-of-strip-footing-3D-2016.00.p3dlog&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Validation-Bi-axial-compression-test-with-Mohr-Coulomb-model-3D-2016.00.p3dlog&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Let me Help You</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/achievements/687f4b6d-e18a-4e55-836c-49926ca2c9d9</link><pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2021 03:30:59 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:50aebb61-65b4-4ca0-b0f5-d1c591c397ca</guid><dc:creator /><description>Answer a question that is verified as helpful or correct.</description></item></channel></rss>