<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://communities.bentley.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><channel><title>Polka-Dot Spider of the Recycling Bin's Activities</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/members/1306ec3c_2d00_6de7_2d00_4fd0_2d00_ace4_2d00_ea2ee262dde1</link><description>Polka-Dot Spider of the Recycling Bin's recent activity</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 12</generator><item><title>Site object tie-in element is not accurate</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/road___site_design/f/geopak-inroads-mx-openroads-forum/14435/site-object-tie-in-element-is-not-accurate</link><pubDate>Tue, 10 Oct 2017 20:35:31 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:b75839d4-c119-4ea3-a975-7548eeede9f1</guid><dc:creator>Polka-Dot Spider of the Recycling Bin</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;
While using &amp;quot;define side slope element&amp;quot; in Geopak Site Modeler (&amp;quot;to object&amp;quot;&amp;nbsp;= existing ground), the tie&amp;nbsp;leaves a gap . Is this a tolerance issue maybe? See attached profile showing gap between existing and proposed surfaces.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&amp;nbsp;Geopak 08.08.03.24
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&amp;nbsp;
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>