<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://communities.bentley.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><channel><title>Krzysztof Jedrych's Activities</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/members/19e4a7e0_2d00_bc42_2d00_47e8_2d00_a6ff_2d00_72e83d4c1634</link><description>Krzysztof Jedrych's recent activity</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 12</generator><item><title>Bugs for OpenRoads Designer Update 4( the latest version)</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/road___site_design/f/geopak-inroads-mx-openroads-forum/159597/bugs-for-openroads-designer-update-4-the-latest-version</link><pubDate>Tue, 14 Aug 2018 04:43:18 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:84db9dd0-867e-4638-b882-8a8d35323338</guid><dc:creator>Zhengpeng Chen</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;Hi, &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;Recently, I use the ORD U 4 to do a modeling project, and find several bugs.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;AccuSnap function:&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;ORD usually gets dead when AccuSnap function is activated, for example, when creating a corridor and select the position, the cursor will automatically snaps the nearest element which is a reference file and including a lot of line elements, and if&amp;nbsp;snap point is not what I want, I have to move cursor, but sometimes, ORD get dead when moving cursor over the reference element.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Linear Template tool:&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;If the model that is created by Linear Template tool need to be deleted, once click the delete button, ORD gets dead, and stop working dialog appears.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;Besides, the &lt;strong&gt;key station&lt;/strong&gt; can not be applied in the model that is created by Linear Template tool.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;3D line style:&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;Everything is OK in MSTN Update 10, when copy the&amp;nbsp; *.RSC file to its designated path of ORD, the 3D line style show nothing, but the 3D line style name can be seen in the line style selection dialog.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Exporting model to&amp;nbsp;LumenRT Update 10&lt;/strong&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;The Exporting model can not be done always&amp;nbsp;successfully , sometimes, the 3D line Style element&amp;nbsp;gets lost.&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;&lt;strong&gt; before re-exporting, I have to zoom in the model close enough, and adjust view windows&amp;nbsp;scale until &amp;nbsp;the details(3D linestyle) can be seen, then the exporting could be done successfully&lt;/strong&gt;, but I have to adjust view window many times, and do the exporting many times.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;Hope you guys can checks these bugs above, and fix ASAP.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;Looking forward to your reply!&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;Thanks&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;Chen Zhengpeng&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>[ORD U7} Asset Management items problem</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/road___site_design/f/geopak-inroads-mx-openroads-forum/177681/ord-u7-asset-management-items-problem</link><pubDate>Thu, 04 Apr 2019 10:02:04 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:245b21d8-097c-4eaa-9119-5a202db7d184</guid><dc:creator>Krzysztof Jedrych</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;my goal is to assign Items to Feature Definitions in DGNLib which are uploaded from Asset management.xlsm file. So in that case later when I create corridor I can set item properties from pick lists with connection to ...Lookup.xlsx. Everything works fine in DGNLib but in every other file which loads Feature Definitions from library it crashes at moment of creating corridor (assigning Item). I know it&amp;#39;s still Technology preview but maybe someone have a solution. Maybe there&amp;nbsp;is some variable which loads Asset Management.xlsm? I have knowledge only about variable for Lookup which, of course, I am using.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="/resized-image/__size/320x240/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/5922/Item_5F00_pick_5F00_list.png" alt=" " /&gt;&lt;img src="/resized-image/__size/320x240/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/5922/Scheme.png" alt=" " /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Regards,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Krzysztof Jędrych&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Backward Compatibility of OpenRoads?</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/road___site_design/f/geopak-inroads-mx-openroads-forum/192087/backward-compatibility-of-openroads</link><pubDate>Thu, 06 Feb 2020 08:17:36 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:3714169b-bd8c-4159-b8ca-c9e9b9a41f0f</guid><dc:creator>Yuan Ge</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I work with people from another company on this project. They use a more updated version of OpenRoads. They worked on a file and saved it. Now whenever I tried to open it, OpenRoads would only let me open it read-only.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Is there&amp;nbsp;a way to scrub the part of the file that came from the more advanced version of OpenRoads.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Corridor error</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/road___site_design/f/geopak-inroads-mx-openroads-forum/191918/corridor-error</link><pubDate>Mon, 03 Feb 2020 13:18:34 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:8d5b6bef-97cb-45c5-a297-275d3486d6a1</guid><dc:creator>Deval GUPTA</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Dear all,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I have attached an image, can any one tell why this error is coming. Because of this my template is not running. Please help.&lt;img alt=" " src="/resized-image/__size/320x240/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/5922/Ask-Bentley.PNG" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Bentley Navigator Mobile - How to export files from ORD?</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/road___site_design/f/geopak-inroads-mx-openroads-forum/192037/bentley-navigator-mobile---how-to-export-files-from-ord</link><pubDate>Wed, 05 Feb 2020 13:28:20 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:bd34a229-127f-4076-94a8-3f4ebdb5c62f</guid><dc:creator>Krzysztof Jedrych</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Does anyone know how to export properly files to i-bim format so they actually work in Bentley Navigator - mobile version? I tried to export it to i-bim in ORD U7 but the mobile version doesn&amp;#39;t see these files.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Regards&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Krzysztof Jędrych&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>[ORD 2020 R1] Cif Exceptions when using display rules</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/road___site_design/f/geopak-inroads-mx-openroads-forum/191901/ord-2020-r1-cif-exceptions-when-using-display-rules</link><pubDate>Mon, 03 Feb 2020 08:08:21 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:2cf11b3c-9236-4db3-a07c-e95c0636fba9</guid><dc:creator>Krzysztof Jedrych</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;since new update of ORD I encountered plenty of problems when using display rules or adding templates to corridor with new components. Every time I get an error with message Exception logged to:...&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img height="24" src="/resized-image/__size/320x240/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/5922/pastedimage1580716747063v1.png" width="510" alt=" " /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It only happens when I try to add something new to corridor like template with new components or turn on display rule which displays new component. What is strange that such templates work correctly in new files but not in created in U7 and before.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Does anyone know what could be the problem? I uploaded last free exceptions that I had received.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Best regards&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Krzysztof Jędrych&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://communities.bentley.com/cfs-file/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/5922/Exception_2D00_20200203_2D00_084437.log"&gt;communities.bentley.com/.../Exception_2D00_20200203_2D00_084437.log&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href="https://communities.bentley.com/cfs-file/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/5922/Exception_2D00_20200203_2D00_084950.log"&gt;communities.bentley.com/.../Exception_2D00_20200203_2D00_084950.log&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href="https://communities.bentley.com/cfs-file/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/5922/Exception_2D00_20200203_2D00_084951.log"&gt;communities.bentley.com/.../Exception_2D00_20200203_2D00_084951.log&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Ask A Question II</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/achievements/cd3cd235-25c1-476e-bb88-33a5705ca45a</link><pubDate>Mon, 03 Feb 2020 08:08:48 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:03d31b25-4955-4798-bece-f782138de65b</guid><dc:creator /><description>Ask 10 questions in a forum.</description></item><item><title>[ORD R3] Subsurface utilities connections</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/road___site_design/f/geopak-inroads-mx-openroads-forum/187741/ord-r3-subsurface-utilities-connections</link><pubDate>Tue, 29 Oct 2019 18:50:19 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:3d011db5-1dce-4bf2-a22f-ae68b0dd052d</guid><dc:creator>Krzysztof Jedrych</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;recently I built model of utilities from xls and program used some default node cell, which I would like to&amp;nbsp;recreate (see the picture below). However I have some problems with creating such cell. The node should automatically recognize both conduits and rotate accordingly. I made a few nodes so far but I cannot find a way for this one. I also cannot find this cell in Bentley&amp;#39;s .cell file in standards. Can someone help?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="/resized-image/__size/320x240/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/5922/pastedimage1572374907036v1.png" alt=" " /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>3D Markings from ORD to Navisworks</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/road___site_design/f/geopak-inroads-mx-openroads-forum/174174/3d-markings-from-ord-to-navisworks</link><pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2019 07:30:57 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:443f9ff0-d2c4-4e42-a1ff-2d989b703d19</guid><dc:creator>Andre Sprong</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;In MX classic it was possible to export 3D markings to sketchup to get them visible in NavisWorks.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;What is the workflow to get the 3D markings from our ORD-model visible in Navisworks?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Thanks!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>[ORD R2] Cut Fill volumes missing</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/road___site_design/f/geopak-inroads-mx-openroads-forum/186005/ord-r2-cut-fill-volumes-missing</link><pubDate>Mon, 23 Sep 2019 19:11:04 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:f73bdcf4-6340-48f7-b42d-858019f36852</guid><dc:creator>Krzysztof Jedrych</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hello,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I have a strange problem that since R2 update Cut&amp;amp;Fill meshes don&amp;#39;t show volumes anymore. And no matter what I do, whichever model I take I do not have the volumes! Recreating meshes doesn&amp;#39;t solve this as well as Close mesh voids tool (processed 10 times). I am 100% sure that in 10.05. and in 10.06 it worked properly along with closing voids manually. I checked it on different PCs and different models so I am pretty sure it&amp;#39;s an update thing. What I need is a confirmation from someone if it occurs somewhere else also in R2?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Can anyone confirm that?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="/resized-image/__size/320x240/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/5922/pastedimage1569264547595v1.png" alt=" " /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Best regards,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Krzysztof Jędrych&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>[ORD R2] Sight visibility problem</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/road___site_design/f/geopak-inroads-mx-openroads-forum/185101/ord-r2-sight-visibility-problem</link><pubDate>Thu, 05 Sep 2019 07:30:40 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:562d997c-90e4-4e60-95b8-9c8ac5094262</guid><dc:creator>Krzysztof Jedrych</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I have a very distressing problem concerning sight visibility lines. I attached report where we can see that despite requiring 70m of sight distance the program shows some strange values in column &amp;quot;Sight Distance Along Sight Line Achieved&amp;quot; and these lines are being drawn in model. I have no clue out of where these values are taken but it&amp;#39;s a big problem since they are smaller than the required ones. It&amp;#39;s completely unreliable. Does anyone know why ORD doesn&amp;#39;t draw whole sight distance lines?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="/resized-image/__size/320x240/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/5922/SV_5F00_Report.png" alt=" " /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Regards&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Krzysztof Jędrych&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>[ORD R2] Doubling corridor elements</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/road___site_design/f/geopak-inroads-mx-openroads-forum/184055/ord-r2-doubling-corridor-elements</link><pubDate>Thu, 15 Aug 2019 09:27:24 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:dbfcf51b-a22e-480f-a4c2-ac34acbb3687</guid><dc:creator>Krzysztof Jedrych</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;there is an ORD&amp;#39;s problem&amp;nbsp;which I cannot solve for a very long time and since I did not get any response from Bentley on my SR the Communties is my last chance. I implemented ORD in quite a big project (12km of expressway) so we have plenty of road models. Most of them after reproccessing the corridor leave old elements. Sometimes these are lines, sometimes mesh components and sometimes everything. It&amp;#39;s very annoying because I cannot find the reason for this and almost everytime it&amp;#39;s something different. I thought that maybe clipping elements mess with corridor functionality (they do but in a different way), but after few tests I have excluded them as a reason of&amp;nbsp;&lt;strong&gt;doubling corridor elements&lt;/strong&gt;. Our team&amp;nbsp;is terribly frustrated of losing precious time because most of the times the only solution is to make a new clean, file, which will be infected after few weeks or even days.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Is there anyone who had similar issues or knows something about this defect? I would be grateful for any reponse.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Regards&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Krzysztof Jędrych&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>How can I Drape a shape to an ODR terrain without profiles without having to use Inroads to drape it.</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/road___site_design/f/geopak-inroads-mx-openroads-forum/184282/how-can-i-drape-a-shape-to-an-odr-terrain-without-profiles-without-having-to-use-inroads-to-drape-it</link><pubDate>Tue, 20 Aug 2019 15:20:43 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:84d9b6d5-928a-44ff-bbb2-d0c1b5dd232b</guid><dc:creator>Henry Hallio</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I am trying to Drape a shape to an ODR terrain. I found that the only way to do this is by profiling the element. This is way to time consuming, I have over 100 shapes to profile and drape. I am trying not to InRoads to do this and copying the elements into my design file, but it looks as if that is the only way to do this.&amp;nbsp; Help&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Export plan to DWG</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/road___site_design/f/geopak-inroads-mx-openroads-forum/177179/export-plan-to-dwg</link><pubDate>Tue, 26 Mar 2019 09:15:03 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:42cbbb6c-98a0-48a0-b894-318602264c02</guid><dc:creator>Zhao Lun Ng</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi everyone, I am currently using ORD Version 10.03.00.43. I wanted to export 2D plan drawing from ORD to Dwg format. The plan looks fine in ORD as shown in the 1st picture. However after exporting it out to Dwg format, it turned out to have plenty of weird continuous lines(Green) as shown in 2nd Picture. May I know what went wrong on my settings during export process and how could I solve this issue?Thanks alot.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="/resized-image/__size/320x240/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/5922/PIC-1.jpeg" alt=" " /&gt;&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;&lt;img src="/resized-image/__size/320x240/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/5922/Pic-2.jpeg" alt=" " /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>[ORD R4] Parabola Sight Distance</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/road___site_design/f/geopak-inroads-mx-openroads-forum/173809/ord-r4-parabola-sight-distance</link><pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2019 07:52:11 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:b5d02e53-bc9c-4b89-9db3-9c6ab805b428</guid><dc:creator>Krzysztof Jedrych</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;does anyone know how ORD calculates Parabola&amp;#39;s Sight Distance?. It&amp;#39;s one of the fields which we can annotate on profile curves but it looks like it doesn&amp;#39;t do it as in earlier versions (SS4 and below). Can we set some parameters for this like eye and object height? I don&amp;#39;t think that assigning standards for alignment work with this.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img height="371" src="/resized-image/__size/320x240/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/5922/pastedimage1547711306422v1.png" width="329" alt=" " /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Regards&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Krzysztof Jędrych&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>