<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://communities.bentley.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><channel><title>Chris Compton's Activities</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/members/1ae419a4_2d00_fc1a_2d00_4ed5_2d00_8ff9_2d00_c3a46f5cdf0c</link><description>Chris Compton's recent activity</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 12</generator><item><title>Maintaining 3D geometry from SUE utilities in AECOsim</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/road___site_design/f/geopak-inroads-mx-openroads-forum/147412/maintaining-3d-geometry-from-sue-utilities-in-aecosim</link><pubDate>Mon, 26 Feb 2018 16:36:47 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:8d881557-c961-49b6-8f66-c97190a85087</guid><dc:creator>Aitana Marcos Guinea</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi all,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I would like to know if it is possible to bring 3D geometric information from linear utilities (designed with SUE workflow within OpenRoads Designer) into AECOsim Building Designer.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I mean the whole volume information and not just its layout as a 3D linear entity.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the first image I can see 3D data in SUE&amp;nbsp;which I would like to maintain back in AECOsim (in the second image I&amp;#39;ve lost volume data from the conduit whereas the inlet has been properly transferred). I&amp;#39;ve just opened the DGN from OpenRoads Designer into AECOsim; I don&amp;#39;t know if there would be a better workflow to do this.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;img src="/resized-image/__size/320x240/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/5922/3Dgeometry_5F00_SUE_2D00_ORD.JPG" alt=" " /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="/resized-image/__size/320x240/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/5922/3Dlineargeometry_5F00_ABD.jpg" alt=" " /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I would appreciate any suggestion or help!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thank you&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Regards,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Aitana&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>gINT Civil Tools -  Plot Water Levels and Filter by Depth-Related Property</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/geotechnical1/f/geotechnical-forum/174041/gint-civil-tools---plot-water-levels-and-filter-by-depth-related-property</link><pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2019 11:23:31 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:e2f445af-930f-456f-b4cd-cfec93828d35</guid><dc:creator>Chris Compton</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I&amp;#39;m trying to plot water depths but my advance filter is not working.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In our gINT database - monitoring records contain WDEP - Depth to Water and DBSE - Depth to base of installation monitoring record.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I&amp;#39;m trying to plot the WDEP ONLY so I added an advance filter in gINT Projects. I use a &amp;quot;Filter by Depth-Related Property&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;However it is still plotting DBSE when I add &amp;quot;equal to WDEP&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Any ideas?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="text-decoration:underline;"&gt;GINT monitoring DATA&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img alt=" " src="/resized-image/__size/320x240/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/283906/Monitoring-Records.JPG" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="text-decoration:underline;"&gt;Openroads Advanced Query Filter&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img alt=" " src="/resized-image/__size/320x240/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/283906/Advance-Filter.JPG" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="text-decoration:underline;"&gt;Example of Borehole Data&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="text-decoration:underline;"&gt;&lt;img alt=" " src="/resized-image/__size/320x240/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/283906/DBSE.JPG" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Terrain from Borehole Lithology which has multiple samples of the same material</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/geotechnical1/f/geotechnical-forum/158207/terrain-from-borehole-lithology-which-has-multiple-samples-of-the-same-material</link><pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2018 15:30:56 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:402f1728-30c6-4d05-8501-4fe9f6f9c82a</guid><dc:creator>Chris Compton</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I&amp;#39;m trying to create a terrain using borehole lithology.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The borehole data is quite detailed and in many instances contains multiple layers of the same material (albeit with different notes etc).&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When I create a terrain it doesn&amp;#39;t select the top layer. Is there a way to force it to pick the top layer.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If you see the image you can see it triangulating to a lower point in the boreholes stick. I want it to triangulate the top part.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The pink is the same rock layer.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img alt=" " src="/resized-image/__size/320x240/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/283906/GINT-lithology.JPG" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Bentley Navigator Measure Volume Issue</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/road___site_design/f/geopak-inroads-mx-openroads-forum/157693/bentley-navigator-measure-volume-issue</link><pubDate>Mon, 09 Jul 2018 18:52:13 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:98e3b632-70ed-4da8-a778-c06efa1d9008</guid><dc:creator>Chris Compton</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I have an Openroads model that contains an IFC element imported via Aecosim.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It looks great in Openroads and Navigator but there is a discrepancy with the volume of the solid being reported.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The volume is correct in Openroads. But when I measure it navigator the volume is incorrect.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Anyone seen this before?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Correct ORD Volume being reported&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img alt=" " src="/resized-image/__size/320x240/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/5922/ORD-Volume.JPG" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Incorrect Navigator volume being reported&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img alt=" " src="/resized-image/__size/320x240/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/5922/ORD-NAvigator-Volume.JPG" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Status of OpenRoad Designer and File compatibility</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/road___site_design/f/geopak-inroads-mx-openroads-forum/157091/status-of-openroad-designer-and-file-compatibility</link><pubDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2018 14:08:38 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:7907e85c-8c76-417a-8eb1-097932602663</guid><dc:creator>Chris T</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Yesterday I sat through the BIM for Civil Engineers Webinar in regards to OpenRoads Designer and at the end the presenter mentioned that OpenRoads Designer is able to have Topcon and Trimble support with the software, as well as the ability to import and export IFC models.&amp;nbsp; I&amp;#39;ve been working on an implementation plan for our company for some time now and from my knowledge of Version 3, I haven&amp;#39;t been able to find any specific functionality within that version that accommodates IFC, on interoperability of TopCON and Trimble beyond specific survey functions.&amp;nbsp; To say the least I&amp;#39;m quite confused on what the software that is publically available actually can do vs. wishlist items, and also disappointed that some functionality that helped interoperability that we used ICM for instance is no longer being supported.&amp;nbsp; So if what was presented in the webinar is factually correct, would it be possible to either post that information on the learn server to demo the processes, or provide a webinar, or update the help that explains these processes better?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But to a bigger point, I&amp;#39;m finding his miss mash of conflicting information really isn&amp;#39;t helping our company personally advance much in so much as moving to this platform, but also not having clear and consistent information available on what the product currently can performed makes it actually worse.&amp;nbsp; The current online README for the files I feel is not current with the available software, which further adds to the confusion.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So from a discussion point, can there be some consideration to placing a sticky topic on this forum that at least provides the minimum functionality that&amp;#39;s currently available in the public builds, as well as a roadmap with anticipated schedule of updates to the products available ?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Openroads Import IFCL Can I display &amp;quot;Property Set&amp;quot; attributes in Properties dialogue box</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/road___site_design/f/geopak-inroads-mx-openroads-forum/155333/openroads-import-ifcl-can-i-display-property-set-attributes-in-properties-dialogue-box</link><pubDate>Tue, 29 May 2018 14:50:32 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:f701e759-f381-4b63-855d-a7766e66252c</guid><dc:creator>Chris Compton</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hello, I am importing an IFC into Openroads and creating an I-Model... Is there a way to display the IFC property Set (i.e. attributes) in Openroads?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When I bring in the IFC into Solibri or Navisworks I can see the element properties such as volume and surface area. But I can&amp;#39;t see it in Openroads.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://docs.buildingsmartalliance.org/MVD_COBIE/schema/ifckernel/lexical/ifcpropertyset.htm"&gt;http://docs.buildingsmartalliance.org/MVD_COBIE/schema/ifckernel/lexical/ifcpropertyset.htm&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I&amp;#39;m using Update 2&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="/resized-image/__size/320x240/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/5922/ORD-IFC-Property-Set.JPG" alt=" " /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>GINT Civil Tools - Adding a borehole symbolisation rule</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/geotechnical1/f/geotechnical-announcements-forum/151920/gint-civil-tools---adding-a-borehole-symbolisation-rule</link><pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2018 08:48:14 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:ec6ebfa6-7cfe-44d7-9225-1f45363b6510</guid><dc:creator>Chris Compton</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;So I&amp;#39;m trying to represent different borehole types with a different symbol cells. There are 2800 boreholes in total.. I believe I&amp;#39;m doing everything correctly but all the boreholes are being plotted by the &amp;quot;Default&amp;quot; point type. Even though the Property and the value is specified in the symbology tab. Is there something I am missing?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I&amp;#39;ve attached the data connectivity and the borehole properties.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The symbol should change the for the &amp;quot;type of activity&amp;quot;. Ie. &amp;quot;CP+RC&amp;quot;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img alt=" " src="/resized-image/__size/320x240/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/343483/Database-connectivity.JPG" /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;img alt=" " src="/resized-image/__size/320x240/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/343483/borehole-property.JPG" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>ORD Update 2 - Element Template Association</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/road___site_design/f/geopak-inroads-mx-openroads-forum/147673/ord-update-2---element-template-association</link><pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2018 16:49:01 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:c5991ba1-a01a-4567-86c0-0d7472fc4f25</guid><dc:creator>Chris Compton</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;We have a rather strict CAD QA system for the High speed Rail project in the UK (using Projectwise).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I&amp;#39;m slowing figuring out how to amend the ORD workspace so the models pass the cad QA procedure. But I&amp;#39;m hitting a glitch.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If I use ORD straight out of the box and assign a feature for example Terrain / Proposed Triangles. ORD will create a number of layers (for example... see table below)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If I change amend the layers in the&amp;nbsp;Features_Annotations_Levels_Elem Temp Metric.dgnlib&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The software doesn&amp;#39;t create the layers. It instead puts them all on default.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I have tried enabling/disabling the &amp;quot;Element Template Association&amp;quot;.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Any ideas?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;table width="248"&gt;
&lt;tbody&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;td width="248"&gt;Terrain_Design&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;td&gt;Terrain_Triangle&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;td&gt;Terrain_Contour_Minor&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;td&gt;Terrain_Contour_Major&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;td&gt;Terrain_Triangle_Vertices&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;/tbody&gt;
&lt;/table&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img alt=" " src="/resized-image/__size/320x240/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/5922/ORD-Element-Templates.JPG" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>ORD Update 2 Subsurface Feature Definitions are not customisable??</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/road___site_design/f/geopak-inroads-mx-openroads-forum/147413/ord-update-2-subsurface-feature-definitions-are-not-customisable</link><pubDate>Mon, 26 Feb 2018 16:37:26 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:d8f564d7-ac61-407b-83f1-8481c51e59f0</guid><dc:creator>Chris Compton</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;We have a significant BIM requirement for the High Speed 2 Rail Project in United Kingdom.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;We want to add too the subsurface features and map too project layers, so it passes CAD QA.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Is there a method to update the subsurface features definitions?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I watched the Workspace training videos and it states that Nodes and Conduits are not supported in the import/Export process??&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Is this still the case?? What options do we have to get additional elements added to the library.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Subsurface Utilities</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/road___site_design/f/geopak-inroads-mx-openroads-forum/138812/subsurface-utilities</link><pubDate>Fri, 21 Jul 2017 16:14:36 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:8ab63643-6348-451e-bace-3ce04b15c64b</guid><dc:creator>Chris McNulty</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I set up a subsurface utility model in my design file. It is making my design file run slowly and crash alot. Is there a way to undo the model creation of the subsurface utilities in my design model?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Ask A Question I</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/achievements/460ac7df-7ccc-4c42-a204-9e05eef3be09</link><pubDate>Mon, 26 Feb 2018 05:56:50 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:85cbf643-9cc7-4bea-9622-090d7225bfaa</guid><dc:creator /><description>Ask a question in a forum.</description></item><item><title>gINT Civil Tools for Power InRoads SS4</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/geotechnical1/f/geotechnical-forum/128717/gint-civil-tools-for-power-inroads-ss4</link><pubDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2016 00:16:47 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:d8aa8865-2861-4d76-aac6-13c706212ca7</guid><dc:creator>Jaxon</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;When using Power InRoads SS4 I can view boreholes in plan and 3D views. However, when attempting to display boreholes in profile view I get the message &amp;ldquo;No profile ports in active model&amp;rdquo;.&amp;nbsp; Will there be an update that fixes this for SS4 civil products?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Query in gINT Civil Tools</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/geotechnical1/f/geotechnical-forum/136453/query-in-gint-civil-tools</link><pubDate>Wed, 17 May 2017 14:47:58 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:f7a3fd53-02d4-4e9a-b5e9-0c60485677b6</guid><dc:creator>Sam Mcintyre</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hello,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I recently downloaded gINT Civil Tools and for the time being, am just trying to get acquainted with the program for evaluation.&amp;nbsp; I think my main use for the program would be to load a database and query drill holes based on certain properties.&amp;nbsp; If I connect to a database and try to do an advanced query, I only see the option to query PointID, East, North, Elevation and Depth.&amp;nbsp; Is there a way to query based on other properties in the Point table?&amp;nbsp; For example,&amp;nbsp;my database&amp;nbsp;table is coded to differentiate between holes of varying drill methods and I would like to see just the core holes on a site.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Any help would be appreciated!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thanks,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Sam&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>