<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://communities.bentley.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><channel><title>alireza ebrahimi's Communities Activities</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/members/2a4c5f5b_2d00_5d04_2d00_479d_2d00_a02a_2d00_cd2607130fdf</link><description>Recent activity for people in alireza ebrahimi's community</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 12</generator><item><title>Accidental Eccentricity in Semi-Regid Diaphragms in RAM SS - Static Load Cases</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/ram-staad/f/ram-staad-forum/187292/accidental-eccentricity-in-semi-regid-diaphragms-in-ram-ss---static-load-cases</link><pubDate>Mon, 21 Oct 2019 09:40:53 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:3a6ced73-b378-48ee-9ea8-bb8c35f4de6f</guid><dc:creator>alireza ebrahimi</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Seth,&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Could you please make&amp;nbsp;it clear&amp;nbsp;that whether Ram SS consider the accidental eccentricity in semi-rigid diaphragms even with&amp;nbsp;&amp;ldquo;static&amp;rdquo; earthquake load&amp;nbsp;cases?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;As I know,&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;with semi-rigid diaphragms, even with &amp;ldquo;static&amp;rdquo; seismic loadings, RAM instead of lumping mass at the center of mass and applying earthquake loads at center of mass of each diaphragms or an eccentric location, applies the loads according to each&amp;nbsp;finite element mesh&amp;nbsp;and associated mass to each mesh. &amp;nbsp;I want to know in such case,&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;mass eccentricity which is defined in diaphragm masses table&amp;nbsp;is also applied and considered?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;with Regards&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Ali&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Line load on slab edge or directly on slab</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/ram-staad/f/ram-staad-forum/186997/line-load-on-slab-edge-or-directly-on-slab</link><pubDate>Tue, 15 Oct 2019 11:23:27 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:12ab5d73-5396-4ae3-998e-39c5e4826257</guid><dc:creator>alireza ebrahimi</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Seth,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Is it possible in Ram SS to apply line loads on slab edge in a concrete structures which does not have any beams?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Or is it possible to apply line or point loads directly on concrete slab?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;when I apply&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;line loads on slab edge I observe errors in the integrity check report regarding not supporting line loads in the layout. &amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thank You.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Ask A Question I</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/achievements/460ac7df-7ccc-4c42-a204-9e05eef3be09</link><pubDate>Tue, 08 Oct 2019 03:01:54 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:df005c47-4f71-495d-b24c-7b866e9204e4</guid><dc:creator /><description>Ask a question in a forum.</description></item><item><title>movement joint modelling in ram ss (vertical load capacity without tension capacity)</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/ram-staad/f/ram-staad-forum/186630/movement-joint-modelling-in-ram-ss-vertical-load-capacity-without-tension-capacity</link><pubDate>Tue, 08 Oct 2019 12:14:41 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:5ab6d00b-9cde-4c5c-aad7-b1c834a09cd0</guid><dc:creator>alireza ebrahimi</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I&amp;#39;m modeling a concrete two-way slab structure including multiple permanent &amp;quot;movement joints&amp;quot; with&amp;nbsp;Ram SS.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In my model, movement joints are mostly located at the middle of spans and if I develop completely separated edges at each side of the joint, then half of the span&amp;nbsp;will act as cantilever slab which is not correct because ram creates two separated diaphragms and there would be no shear transfer. I need to say that the movement joint detailing has round dowels&amp;nbsp;to facilitate vertical load transfer without tension capacity.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;My question is how to model a movement joint in ram ss &amp;quot;to be capable&amp;quot; to transfer vertical load without tension capacity? does ram ss has a solution for this issue?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;regards&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Ali&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>