https://communities.bentley.com/members/2bccc763_2d00_8fd8_2d00_4e0d_2d00_be2c_2d00_7480fac89be8Recent activity for people in David Lanham's communityen-USTelligent Community 12https://communities.bentley.com/products/administration/f/product-administration-forum/102606/v8i---ucf-vs-pcfMon, 17 Nov 2014 14:48:30 GMT6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:090e665a-b805-433a-8419-345e13d473fbDavid Lanham<p>I noticed that if I placed a configuration variable in both the UCF and the PCF, then the UCF was &quot;cancelling&quot; the PCF.&nbsp; In both files, I was using the &quot;&gt;&quot; sign to append the definition.&nbsp;</p> <p>For example, I had MS_MACRO defined in both, using the &quot;&gt;&quot;.&nbsp;&nbsp; The result from the UCF showed up during checking, but not the PCF.&nbsp; If I commented out the UCF definition, then the PCF result would show up during checking.&nbsp;</p> <p>Has anyone run into this before?</p><div style="clear:both;"></div>