<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://communities.bentley.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><channel><title>Anzelika Jurkiene's Activities</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/members/33778c69_2d00_0921_2d00_4c98_2d00_8738_2d00_4414deaf1295</link><description>Anzelika Jurkiene's recent activity</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 12</generator><item><title>Civil Storm. Side weir not functioning with diameter change</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/hydraulics___hydrology/f/haestad-hydraulics-and-hydrology-forum/226262/civil-storm-side-weir-not-functioning-with-diameter-change</link><pubDate>Wed, 23 Feb 2022 22:15:53 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:33f315c1-e716-4c58-a1de-684fbcd1c793</guid><dc:creator>Anzelika Jurkiene</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I have problem with modeling side weir in the situation when diameter of the conduit changes for example from&amp;nbsp; DN800 to DN300.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Side weir suppose to start working at crest&amp;nbsp; elevation 97,55, but nothing happens when the water level in the conduit reaches this level. The water starts to overflow only at 97,7 only when water level reaches the maximum modeling point.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img alt=" " src="/resized-image/__size/320x240/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/5925/SIde-weir-DN300.png" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But when I change the diameter of the conduit to DN 800, so there is no change in the diameters in the profile line, side weir starts to work properly. If overflows as it should at elevation 97,30.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img alt=" " src="/resized-image/__size/320x240/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/5925/SIde-weir-DN800.png" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Please explain the hydraulics in these situations and why does side weir makes different effect in these two situations.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Civil Storm. Connecting two rainwater drainage systems with two separate Outfalls</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/hydraulics___hydrology/f/haestad-hydraulics-and-hydrology-forum/226027/civil-storm-connecting-two-rainwater-drainage-systems-with-two-separate-outfalls</link><pubDate>Fri, 18 Feb 2022 11:09:44 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:eb137ed4-303a-4deb-b516-c9e6efe5ebfa</guid><dc:creator>Anzelika Jurkiene</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hello,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Recently I am modeling two rainwater gravity drainage systems with two separate Outfalls. My task is to connect them together and to analyze the hydraulic flow distribution after the connection.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;My question is: is there any suggestions or rules for selection of the connecting element?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Which link element should be used for this kind of connections? Can these systems be connecting with the same element that is used in the system, for example Conduit?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Is there any known routine how to model this kind of connections? And what should be considered during the modeling?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Civil Storm CONNECT Edition</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/hydraulics___hydrology/f/haestad-hydraulics-and-hydrology-forum/225098/civil-storm-connect-edition</link><pubDate>Thu, 27 Jan 2022 10:07:14 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:83ece9ce-7121-488d-a57b-723e75774a67</guid><dc:creator>Anzelika Jurkiene</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hello,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Just noticed that sum of two conduit flows do not match the flow in conduit after the connection of previous two.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;As it is shown in the scheme of the model, there is two conduits with flow of 133,4 L/s and 51,09 L/s, that connects in the same manhole. If I sum those flows mathematically, I get flow of 184,49 L/s which is bigger than the flow after the connecting manhole, which is 176,11 L/s.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;How to interpret this situation? Why the numbers do not match?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I am using GVF &amp;ndash; Rational Calculation Solver. Runoff Method &amp;ndash; Rational Method. &amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img alt=" " src="/resized-image/__size/320x240/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/5925/suming-the-flow-of-two-conduits.png" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Requirements for Civil Storm Terrain Model</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/road___site_design/f/geopak-inroads-mx-openroads-forum/220723/requirements-for-civil-storm-terrain-model</link><pubDate>Wed, 13 Oct 2021 19:48:14 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:8b186e49-a5e9-41ca-86f5-8d253e036fb7</guid><dc:creator>Anzelika Jurkiene</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hello, &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I am starting my Civil Storm rain waste water project and having difficulties with Terrain Model application.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When I import my Terrain Model Shape file, size approximately 5000 m x 5000 m it complicates the work of the Civil Storm program it self. The density of isolines is 0,25 m. While importing the file Civil Storm starts lagging and not responding.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Is there any technical requirements for the format of the Terrain Model source file?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Is there any description for preparation of Terrain Model Source file?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Anželika Jurkienė&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Hydraulic Engineer&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Ask A Question I</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/achievements/460ac7df-7ccc-4c42-a204-9e05eef3be09</link><pubDate>Tue, 12 Oct 2021 02:42:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:adc6a793-53bc-48de-865e-df575f53d66a</guid><dc:creator /><description>Ask a question in a forum.</description></item><item><title>Civil Storm. Automatic Catchment assignment to the nearest Outflow Element.</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/hydraulics___hydrology/f/haestad-hydraulics-and-hydrology-forum/220637/civil-storm-automatic-catchment-assignment-to-the-nearest-outflow-element</link><pubDate>Tue, 12 Oct 2021 12:00:40 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:a008c944-b6a6-4129-9fe8-eefadc8dfc45</guid><dc:creator>Anzelika Jurkiene</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hello,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Is there a way to AUTOMATICALLY assign already existing Catchments to Manholes?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Currently I am working on rain waist water&amp;nbsp; project that covers entire city of 401 km&amp;sup2;. So it is a large area. I have a Terrain Model for my surface. I already have Catchments imported to my Civil Storm model via Model Builder. Manholes are imported as well. I need to assign existing Catchments to nearest Manholes AUTOMATICALLY. How do I do that?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thank You.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Anželika Jurkienė&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Hydraulic Engineer&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>