<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://communities.bentley.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><channel><title>Manuel Lüscher's Activities</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/members/374ba770_2d00_0a5a_2d00_4395_2d00_b268_2d00_636b8729041b</link><description>Manuel Lüscher's recent activity</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 12</generator><item><title>Vertical design process in OpenRail</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/rail_design/f/openrail-forum/207390/vertical-design-process-in-openrail</link><pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2020 17:59:31 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:276a3aab-b9d2-4629-a7a4-ddd73bbcf5db</guid><dc:creator>James Ransome</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi All,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It seems as though OpenRail has lost some functionality in vertical design&amp;nbsp;process, I will explain below:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The way BRT did vertical design I could see all of my verticals, all at the same scale and all in the same window,&amp;nbsp;do a bit of CAD to annotate cut in points or spot areas to keep lifts/lowers to a specific magnitude and maybe even reference in the horizontal beneath to make it easier to find features such as Bridges, Platforms, S&amp;amp;C etc.... However, in OpenRail this functionality seem to have been totally stripped out and replaced with something that seems&amp;nbsp;similar to&amp;nbsp;what MX offered users, with a single window that scales in and out uncontrollably and can&amp;#39;t be married up with any other vertical or horizontal, it seems a very blinkered way of designing a vertical alignment.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Is anyone else finding the OpenRail vertical design process somewhat lacking when compared to BRT vertical design process or am I missing some functionality in OpenRail?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If other users are feeling that&amp;nbsp;the OpenRail vertical design process could be improved then please post on here&amp;nbsp;with your suggestions&amp;nbsp;or experiences.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Regards&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;James&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Making Connections</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/achievements/a0a973a4-3516-49d8-bea2-7e6377bc9cc1</link><pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2021 09:58:10 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:8c678d41-2324-49bb-8c76-432b5f93ca21</guid><dc:creator /><description>Make 5 friends within the community.</description></item><item><title>Create a reverse spiral with transiton between clothoide 0,00</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/road___site_design/f/geopak-inroads-mx-openroads-forum/191758/create-a-reverse-spiral-with-transiton-between-clothoide-0-00</link><pubDate>Wed, 29 Jan 2020 21:48:20 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:95536ad0-666f-4da7-a839-22bdfcda43b1</guid><dc:creator>M.C. Bos</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I&amp;#39;ve been trying to create a reverse spiral with the transition length between the spirals set to 0.00. It seems there is no function to do this. Is this correct or am I missing out on something. Is there a best practise?&lt;img src="/resized-image/__size/320x240/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/5922/reverse_5F00_spiral.png" alt=" " /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>