<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://communities.bentley.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><channel><title>jerome garnon's Activities</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/members/3a7d1b32_2d00_9dd1_2d00_4911_2d00_85ca_2d00_12b3f7bc3c3b</link><description>jerome garnon's recent activity</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 12</generator><item><title>Data marker within text</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/geotechnical1/f/geotechnical-forum/243121/data-marker-within-text</link><pubDate>Mon, 20 Mar 2023 11:24:22 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:798b1ad1-646d-4129-8f2e-113106cd604f</guid><dc:creator>jerome garnon</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;has anybody ever managed to remove the spaces that are automatically created around a data marker when it&amp;#39;s inserted in the middle of a text in a report?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thank you&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>AGS 4.1</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/geotechnical1/f/geotechnical-forum/225785/ags-4-1</link><pubDate>Mon, 14 Feb 2022 12:14:20 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:7ddbfd0f-b6c4-4475-8798-f3c2a436c24e</guid><dc:creator>jerome garnon</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi,&lt;br /&gt;I was wondering if you will be providing AGS 4.1 templates like you did for the previous AGS versions?&lt;br /&gt;Thank you&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Bar chart not working in fence</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/geotechnical1/f/geotechnical-forum/231866/bar-chart-not-working-in-fence</link><pubDate>Tue, 28 Jun 2022 11:02:36 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:aada7a4b-105c-4b8a-9cd5-c709575f6582</guid><dc:creator>jerome garnon</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;has anybody already have issues with&amp;nbsp;bar chart not working in fences, or is it me doing something silly?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thank you&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>gINT Professional: Logs in Polish, using extended Latin characters come up as question marks</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/geotechnical1/f/geotechnical-forum/191829/gint-professional-logs-in-polish-using-extended-latin-characters-come-up-as-question-marks</link><pubDate>Fri, 31 Jan 2020 11:59:08 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:f82d3a99-afe3-4d80-a7d6-4a15437d746d</guid><dc:creator>Christopher Brandish-Lowe</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;We need to produce logs in Polish however extended Latin characters come up as question marks.&amp;nbsp; Does anybody know how we can get around this?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The symbols are not currently under data markers so stopping short of making our own is there any other way of getting letters such as:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;ł&amp;nbsp;ż ę ś ć ą&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thanks,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Chris&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Dependant columns in log template</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/geotechnical1/f/geotechnical-forum/223061/dependant-columns-in-log-template</link><pubDate>Mon, 06 Dec 2021 12:36:46 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:7c02f587-ed03-4b09-b4e8-1fd81c33f32e</guid><dc:creator>jerome garnon</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I have an issue I&amp;#39;m sure many would have come across:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;On a multiple plot (log template), I have several columns of data. I&amp;nbsp;apply an output condition on each data record (like the soil unit check on depth). The condition is then checked for each column and it takes ages to produce the output. Would there exist a trick to allow doing the check only once (per table of course)?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If not, that would be great in a future version of gINT (like having dependant columns like for tables...)!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I hope it makes sense!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thank you&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Jerome&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>export AGS from gINT giving errors</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/geotechnical1/f/geotechnical-forum/225255/export-ags-from-gint-giving-errors</link><pubDate>Mon, 31 Jan 2022 21:25:34 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:ebc53c6d-476d-4019-9334-72c5c5abb07f</guid><dc:creator>Christian Sampaleanu</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I am trying to export an AGS file from a gINT project which contains lab testing data. The gINT project template is gint std ags 4_0_4.gdt and I am using the ags 4_0_4 correspondence file. However, when I export, only the HORN and LOCA tables export, and I get the following errors:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;quot;ERROR: Line 1 - group &amp;#39;HORN&amp;#39; is not an AGS group. (Rule 5).&lt;br /&gt; ERROR: Line 2 - Group &amp;#39;HORN&amp;#39; does not have &amp;#39;HOLE_ID&amp;#39; as the first field (Rule 6a)&lt;br /&gt; ERROR: Line 6 - group &amp;#39;LOCA&amp;#39; is not an AGS group. (Rule 5).&lt;br /&gt; ERROR: Line 7 - Group &amp;#39;LOCA&amp;#39; does not have &amp;#39;HOLE_ID&amp;#39; as the first field (Rule 6a)&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Any suggestions on how to export the lab results to AGS?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thank you&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>AGS file - discard a record</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/geotechnical1/f/geotechnical-forum/225787/ags-file---discard-a-record</link><pubDate>Mon, 14 Feb 2022 12:27:25 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:f6e1b3d5-ddbf-476c-a6ef-12ea4d7cd5ce</guid><dc:creator>jerome garnon</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I am looking for the best way to discard records while producing an AGS file. For example, I&amp;#39;d like the correspondence file to check a boolean field like &amp;quot;DoNotPresentInAGS&amp;quot; but I don&amp;#39;t want to put the condition on each field of the table... I can see that having the condition only on a key field such as PointID doesn&amp;#39;t work unfortunately.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Any help would be appreciated!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thanks&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Ask A Question II</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/achievements/cd3cd235-25c1-476e-bb88-33a5705ca45a</link><pubDate>Mon, 14 Feb 2022 09:00:44 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:413b954f-469e-41c1-b598-e1b56a2d3718</guid><dc:creator /><description>Ask 10 questions in a forum.</description></item><item><title>ABBR_REM</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/geotechnical1/f/geotechnical-forum/206991/abbr_rem</link><pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2020 11:21:27 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:25bd9b3f-a823-4e5c-b5aa-c50dc3ee74d6</guid><dc:creator>jerome garnon</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The field&amp;nbsp;ABBR_REM is not in my AGS export but it is in my correspondence file. Is that normal?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Besides, is there a way to fill this field in, considering the very special status of this table in gINT?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A&amp;nbsp;client is requesting it unfortunately.&amp;nbsp;I&amp;#39;d like to be able to reply to them.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thank you&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>UNIT table in AGS file</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/geotechnical1/f/geotechnical-forum/207062/unit-table-in-ags-file</link><pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2020 11:07:28 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:20a0cd32-6e93-4c05-8fd7-c8387ba21acb</guid><dc:creator>jerome garnon</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When I export my AGS file, the UNIT table presents units that are not used in the file. Is this normal or is it supposed to be addressed in the next version of gINT please?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thank you&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Missing entries in ABBR table</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/geotechnical1/f/geotechnical-forum/206993/missing-entries-in-abbr-table</link><pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2020 12:25:58 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:3da029ee-46b6-4c45-b80d-3ab89865e8fc</guid><dc:creator>jerome garnon</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi,&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;for some reason, my ABBR table is incomplete when I export in AGS4 (I can see that the data related to the&amp;nbsp;abbreviation have been exported).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;However, I have checked that the missing entries&amp;nbsp;are well defined in a Library table. This work for some but not for others...&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Has anyone already have this issue?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Could it be because destination and source tables have different names (which shouldn&amp;#39;t affect the process)?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thank you&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Populating AGS ABBR_LIST field</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/geotechnical1/f/geotechnical-forum/183885/populating-ags-abbr_list-field</link><pubDate>Mon, 12 Aug 2019 13:11:19 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:611c8ce5-a639-47fd-8fac-89e83f17d88a</guid><dc:creator>Paul Chaplin</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The ABBR_LIST field in the UK AGS Transfer Format is used so that the Abbreviations used within the complete file can be attributed to a specific organisation or company.&amp;nbsp; Ideally we would like to be able to identify within the file which abbreviations are created by our company, and which ones are derived from the &amp;quot;Approved&amp;quot; codes on the AGS website.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When exporting from gINT it appears to create ABBR_CODE and the ABBR_DESC.&amp;nbsp; This is created from the Code and Description Fields in the corresponding Library Table.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Looking at the gINT Std AGS4 to AGS4.gcx file there are several references to the ABBR_LIST field but all of the tables are set to &amp;lt;&amp;lt;OMIT&amp;gt;&amp;gt; (AGS_FIELD_GEOLOGIC_CODE, AGS_FIELD_GEOLOGIC_CODE2 and ABBR)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Some of the tables in the AGS4 template provided with gINT have the field &amp;quot;Source&amp;quot; (ABBR_LIST) but not all do.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Exactly how does gINT create this information in the AGS file if the tables are set to &amp;lt;&amp;lt;OMIT&amp;gt;&amp;gt; and why does the ABBR_LIST not populate, even for those Library tables that do include the Souce (ABBR_LIST) field?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Filter on Graphs</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/geotechnical1/f/geotechnical-forum/202202/filter-on-graphs</link><pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2020 15:56:04 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:33f04651-52b2-4b55-bdfc-b64b77e98b60</guid><dc:creator>jerome garnon</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I have a graph to display Particle size curves, whose Key Set is set to &amp;quot;PointID,Depth&amp;quot;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It works very well until I try to apply a filter on the POINT table at output time (on LOCA_CLST for example). Then I always get a &amp;quot;... return no data&amp;quot; message. I also tried to filter within the report (&amp;lt;&amp;lt;IIf()&amp;gt;&amp;gt; statement)...&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Is it because the filter should only apply to the &amp;quot;GRAT&amp;quot; table (I noticed it appeared by default in the filter dialog)?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In that case, would there be a better way than adding a new field in GRAT (or GRAG) automatically filled by lookup to the POINT table field...?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thank you&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Jerome&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Order in Sql List</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/geotechnical1/f/geotechnical-forum/201710/order-in-sql-list</link><pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2020 14:11:51 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:4b1c1365-bfde-4639-9e39-55c7025e4abc</guid><dc:creator>jerome garnon</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I cannot manage to obtain my Sql list in the right order. I have even tried to create an &amp;quot;_ORDER&amp;quot; field with integers without success with the &amp;quot;order by&amp;quot; clause in my Sql...&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I believe it is related to the fact that my Itemkeys are strings, so that I obtain:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;1&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;10&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;11&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;12...&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;2&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;20...&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Any ideas???&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thank you&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Jerome&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Let me Help You</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/achievements/687f4b6d-e18a-4e55-836c-49926ca2c9d9</link><pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2020 07:42:57 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:b0bf7ad9-23e6-48b8-b98d-0d54541c21af</guid><dc:creator /><description>Answer a question that is verified as helpful or correct.</description></item></channel></rss>