Aaron BUENAVENTURA's Communities Activitieshttps://communities.bentley.com/members/3f492e33_2d00_35c7_2d00_4841_2d00_8115_2d00_f7c068dcfe9cRecent activity for people in Aaron BUENAVENTURA's communityen-USTelligent Community 12Unable to converge after conversion from PLAXIS 3D 2018 to PLAXIS 3D CE V22https://communities.bentley.com/products/geotech-analysis/f/forum/233789/unable-to-converge-after-conversion-from-plaxis-3d-2018-to-plaxis-3d-ce-v22Tue, 09 Aug 2022 07:30:34 GMT6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:16cd61eb-6c31-424c-b21e-68e2d64b74b1Aaron BUENAVENTURA<p>Hi all,</p> <p>I&#39;m currently doing a project on tunneling and wanted to use the model from the previous project for it. However, the previous project used PLAXIS 3D 2018 and we recently upgraded to PLAXIS 3D CE V22.</p> <p>The warnings that appeared when the file was converted looked like additional functions and should not affect the calculations that much (I will be attaching them here) but for some reason, the model does not converge anymore and stops calculating.</p> <p>By default, picos solver is used and the problem was resolved when I switched to pardiso, which is good for me. However, my colleague is also having problems with his model after converting it to the latest version so we are trying to find out what the issue is.</p> <p>What can we do to optimize the calculation for the model? Thanks for the help.</p> <p><a href="https://communities.bentley.com/cfs-file/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/343671/Changes.txt">communities.bentley.com/.../Changes.txt</a></p><div style="clear:both;"></div>Ask A Question Ihttps://communities.bentley.com/achievements/460ac7df-7ccc-4c42-a204-9e05eef3be09Tue, 09 Aug 2022 02:43:45 GMT6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:830e05a6-7d59-4a24-a07d-b102c5ea56c8Ask a question in a forum.