<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://communities.bentley.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><channel><title>Joshua Bush's Activities</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/members/410bd2d4_2d00_d3e5_2d00_4cab_2d00_8cde_2d00_399fe4cfe042</link><description>Joshua Bush's recent activity</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 12</generator><item><title>Verifying Fatigue Stresses in Leap Bridge Steel</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/bridge_design___engineering/f/bridgemaster-lars-leap-openbridge-rm-forum/203007/verifying-fatigue-stresses-in-leap-bridge-steel</link><pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2020 16:31:23 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:ac2e588d-00ce-4935-9b47-02da9774a742</guid><dc:creator>Nathan Rick</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hello,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I have a bridge model that is consistently telling me there are fatigue stress issues with my plate girder section.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I have exported the live load range that the model has created for a given girder and while comparing it to the section modulus at the locations reported to have issues I am coming up with a stress that is significantly less that what is&amp;nbsp;reported.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="/resized-image/__size/320x240/__key/communityserver-components-multipleuploadfilemanager/5274c472_2D00_fd3d_2D00_4212_2D00_9525_2D00_b25f4eda25db-1071300-complete/pastedimage1599669788508v1.png" alt=" " /&gt;&lt;img src="/resized-image/__size/320x240/__key/communityserver-components-multipleuploadfilemanager/5274c472_2D00_fd3d_2D00_4212_2D00_9525_2D00_b25f4eda25db-1071300-complete/pastedimage1599669841429v2.png" alt=" " /&gt;&lt;img src="/resized-image/__size/320x240/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/5930/pastedimage1599753232687v1.png" alt=" " /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When I use just the bottom fiber Sx for the areas, I compute the stress for point 42.18 as follows:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="/resized-image/__size/320x240/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/5930/pastedimage1599754933551v2.png" alt=" " /&gt;&lt;img src="/resized-image/__size/320x240/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/5930/pastedimage1599755444324v3.png" alt=" " /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When I add in the load factor of 1.75 x 2 ksi I get the stress to be 3.52 ksi at point 42.18 for example. The fatigue report is telling me this stress is being computed for the 12 ksi allowed is 1.75 x 6.089 = 10.66 ksi.&amp;nbsp; This leads to the the report of 88% of capacity being returned.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I am not sure how to reconcile these stresses, the model I have is a bridge that is skewed in excess of 20 degrees, so perhaps there is a deflection base later flange stress being considered, but the reports for this in the analysis do not return a lateral bending moment in the flange.&amp;nbsp; If anyone can provide some direction it would be greatly appreciated, thank you in advance.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>