<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://communities.bentley.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><channel><title>TN's Activities</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/members/453c9ec0_2d00_2120_2d00_409e_2d00_89cf_2d00_7c7dbd365c5c</link><description>TN's recent activity</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 12</generator><item><title>ORD - Duplicate Complex Elements from Corridor</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/road___site_design/f/geopak-inroads-mx-openroads-forum/147564/ord---duplicate-complex-elements-from-corridor</link><pubDate>Wed, 28 Feb 2018 18:08:10 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:bfc40320-60b7-4b09-8702-a9b111914d01</guid><dc:creator>TN</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I updated the point names on some templates and after synchronizing the template, the corridor models correctly however the previous point name and complex element still exists in the drawing. So I&amp;#39;m left with multiple slope stake lines throughout the corridor. I&amp;#39;ve tried Process Corridor and that doesn&amp;#39;t help. Any other ideas?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thanks&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>InRoads End Area Volumes Tool - how to access?</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/road___site_design/f/geopak-inroads-mx-openroads-forum/209273/inroads-end-area-volumes-tool---how-to-access</link><pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2021 22:13:33 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:43ff4c53-6ec1-4156-bf97-3f21109cfffa</guid><dc:creator>TN</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I&amp;#39;m running InRoads SS2 and am wondering how I can make the InRoads End Area Volumes tool available from the Evaluation menu. Is it an add-on or something added in a more recent version of the software?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I need end area volumes for a specific station range to display on each respective profile sheet.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thanks!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Nearmap to MicroStation (Jpg)</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/microstation/f/microstation-forum/205102/nearmap-to-microstation-jpg</link><pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2020 15:17:44 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:4d41941b-b524-4436-86aa-0971e7f8e1b8</guid><dc:creator>TN</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I have a jpg nearmap export in US survey feet with a jgw file. When I attach the file the coordinates are slightly off from the jgw file. I&amp;#39;ve tried toggling all the settings to see if anything would work but no luck. This is specifically EPSG 2278. What would be causing the shift in the coordinates?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>OpenRoads for Refuge Island and Curb Ramps</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/road___site_design/f/geopak-inroads-mx-openroads-forum/198892/openroads-for-refuge-island-and-curb-ramps</link><pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2020 20:05:34 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:967de684-ab2b-4310-8f40-4d89c4558079</guid><dc:creator>TN</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;What is the best workflow for the latest version of ORD for a street retrofit that includes a refuge island/median and some curb ramp upgrades. There won&amp;#39;t be a street reconstruction in this just a min sawcut out side the new civil works. Thanks!&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>ORD - Complex Redefine Troubleshooting</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/road___site_design/f/geopak-inroads-mx-openroads-forum/147010/ord---complex-redefine-troubleshooting</link><pubDate>Wed, 14 Feb 2018 22:22:15 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:a93ec810-71f5-4a94-a718-4c4e2791ed77</guid><dc:creator>TN</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Is anyone having issues with complex redefine not working for certain alignments? I need to replace a tangent section with two sets of reverse curves at each end of the new segment. The arcs were drawn per tutorial videos, tangent and all. The complex redefine won&amp;#39;t work, it keeps the original tangent section along with the new segment. Should I be looking at the alignment settings for the original line in the explorer window?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Given that ORD doesn&amp;#39;t have alignment editing commands that InRoads has, it&amp;#39;s critical for redefine to function.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Station Equation - Vertical Profile Adjust - InRoads SS2</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/road___site_design/f/geopak-inroads-mx-openroads-forum/194646/station-equation---vertical-profile-adjust---inroads-ss2</link><pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2020 01:56:16 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:128ffc12-d83e-48a4-b716-409cdb0da2a7</guid><dc:creator>TN</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Is there a way to ensure that vertical PI&amp;#39;s hold the same location after a Station Equation is applied? As of now if adding an equation at say 10+00 bk and 10+50 ahd, the vertical after the equation would be off by that difference instead of holding the previous vertical station beyond the equation point. Has this always been something that is manual for the vertical?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Vertical Profile - Station Equation Letter Display</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/road___site_design/f/geopak-inroads-mx-openroads-forum/194511/vertical-profile---station-equation-letter-display</link><pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2020 16:22:19 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:4afcc716-3239-43f0-a9ca-17b467602e09</guid><dc:creator>TN</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I have two station equations for an alignment and would like for the letters a and b not to display for the stations. Is this possible?&amp;nbsp; If I was to drop station equation name, the vertical stations would be off.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thanks!&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>ORD - Cross Section Annotation Inconsistent</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/road___site_design/f/geopak-inroads-mx-openroads-forum/147708/ord---cross-section-annotation-inconsistent</link><pubDate>Sun, 04 Mar 2018 23:18:33 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:9dda0d3e-60a9-4f15-9ff2-c65309ea9fe9</guid><dc:creator>TN</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi,&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Is there a reason annotation works for some cross sections but not others even when the template point names are the same. When managing the annotation group for the cross sections, the points are highlighted in the preview. Some annotation displays but it&amp;#39;s not consistent. Each of the side slopes is highlighted in the manage window as well but maybe 50% display.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Additionally, when you have multiple corridors, is it best to split up the named boundaries and cross section models by corridor?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thanks!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Export Multiple Cross Sections to DWG Quickly</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/road___site_design/f/geopak-inroads-mx-openroads-forum/148134/export-multiple-cross-sections-to-dwg-quickly</link><pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2018 12:32:12 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:e1aac01d-aa49-405a-a29e-087d101aae47</guid><dc:creator>Josh WHEALY</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I&amp;#39;ve figured out how to export one cross section to a DWG but the export process took 3 minutes and 10 seconds.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I have 190 cross sections that need to be converted to DWG&amp;nbsp;but I don&amp;#39;t really have 10 hours to do this.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I also don&amp;#39;t really want to open each model and change visible edges to cached manually.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Is there a quicker way of doing this?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Can my cross sections be arrayed into one model so that cached visible edges can be applied to all 190 at the same time?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Josh&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>ORD - Connect - Dynamic Sections Blank</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/road___site_design/f/geopak-inroads-mx-openroads-forum/142616/ord---connect---dynamic-sections-blank</link><pubDate>Mon, 30 Oct 2017 15:29:52 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:0b80a9a7-6f99-4945-9964-57f8ef57c9a2</guid><dc:creator>TN</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Are there any troubleshooting techniques for when a cross section goes blank except for the CL point? I have been working in the corridor file for a week or so. It doesn&amp;#39;t seem like you can&amp;#39;t delete previous section views and the sections display if the corridor dgn is referenced into another drawing.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>ORD - Quick Terrain From Corridor</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/road___site_design/f/geopak-inroads-mx-openroads-forum/142136/ord---quick-terrain-from-corridor</link><pubDate>Tue, 17 Oct 2017 14:32:04 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:30640ed8-b16f-47bc-ad21-24b694d8ee80</guid><dc:creator>TN</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Is there a workflow to create a terrain from a corridor without having to select each element of the corridor?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thanks&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Corridor Modeling Crash</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/road___site_design/f/geopak-inroads-mx-openroads-forum/157466/corridor-modeling-crash</link><pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2018 18:04:16 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:6fa89572-be2f-4dcc-bd60-429a6735e4bc</guid><dc:creator>dsheely</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I am experiencing a crash every time I try to assign a new template drop to a corridor.&amp;nbsp; It&amp;#39;s always worked before... no issues.&amp;nbsp; The only thing I&amp;#39;m doing different is I&amp;#39;m using a existing terrain that was created from POD file from a mobile lidar scan.&amp;nbsp; Could that file be the culprit?&amp;nbsp; What are the recommendations as far as size of the existing terrain file?&amp;nbsp; I&amp;#39;m using Windows 10, version 1803 and ORD Update 3.&amp;nbsp; I&amp;#39;ve attached the project files.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>OpenRoads Connect Corridors Update 2 to Update 3 now crashing</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/road___site_design/f/geopak-inroads-mx-openroads-forum/157126/openroads-connect-corridors-update-2-to-update-3-now-crashing</link><pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2018 01:36:27 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:38791178-5661-4936-abe0-3b0a8cea6110</guid><dc:creator>TN</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi,&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I have a project broken into 3 corridors that I set up in Update 2. Since upgrading to Update 3 I cannot even add or change a corridor reference without the files crashing. I also cannot select the corridor without a crash. If corridor references, such as a edge of pavement line, are in a design base file what is the solution to these issues. For the reference that is no longer needed do you need to drop it from the corridor before deleting to avoid these ridiculous issues?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thanks&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>ORD Update 2 - Export Cross Sections</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/road___site_design/f/geopak-inroads-mx-openroads-forum/148946/ord-update-2---export-cross-sections</link><pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2018 17:01:19 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:251ed1df-2821-4aca-8ec7-996212f4fc90</guid><dc:creator>TN</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Is there a clean method to exporting the cross sections generated in OpenRoads back to SS2 or SS4 so that those who haven&amp;#39;t upgraded can use &amp;amp; interrogate the file? Why not have an additional function that would allow a snapshot of the cross sections to be put into a single model with no mess of nested references? As it stands, one would need to &amp;#39;replicate&amp;#39; a complete design in SS2/SS4 in order to do clean sections. Sure you can open the Connect cross section file but you get the Civil3d data error and can only be read only which is useless for a sub needing to design off them.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thanks!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>ORD - Cross Section Annotation - Station Label</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/road___site_design/f/geopak-inroads-mx-openroads-forum/145741/ord---cross-section-annotation---station-label</link><pubDate>Tue, 16 Jan 2018 20:33:58 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:7b950631-febe-4c46-9cce-a53f26ac3d7a</guid><dc:creator>TN</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi,&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Which annotation setting in the annotation group typically controls the station label for each cross section?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thanks&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>