<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://communities.bentley.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><channel><title>KB's Activities</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/members/46078a25_2d00_0c67_2d00_4041_2d00_ab98_2d00_a2b6fd5e3318</link><description>KB's recent activity</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 12</generator><item><title>RAM Connection: Dowswell Reference</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/ram-staad/f/ram-staad-forum/137097/ram-connection-dowswell-reference</link><pubDate>Tue, 06 Jun 2017 14:31:50 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:9cbfe9fa-8939-4896-b8a5-da74e3e48d0a</guid><dc:creator>KB</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I frequently see the reference in RAM Connection Calcs to:&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Dowswell, B., 2003, Connection Design for Steel Structures, Structural Design Solutions, LLC&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I have not been able to find this document anywhere which presents a rather large issue when interpreting the RAM Connection Results. &amp;nbsp;Could you please provide a location to buy/access this reference? &amp;nbsp;If it is no longer available for purchase, I would recommend finding a new reference for these calculations, if possible, or providing additional background on the calculations using this reference. &amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RAM Conn vs. RAM Frame Panel Zones</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/ram-staad/f/ram-staad-forum/186578/ram-conn-vs-ram-frame-panel-zones</link><pubDate>Mon, 07 Oct 2019 15:29:09 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:60abf973-5249-42a2-a03c-813b4ddda776</guid><dc:creator>KB</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Why is the panel zone required demand different in RAM Frame - Steel Seismic Provisions than in RAM Connection for a RBS beam directly welded to a column flange?&amp;nbsp; I can replicate the RAM Frame numbers for demand and capacity.&amp;nbsp; In RAM Connection, the capacity matches RAM Frame, but the demand is much greater.&amp;nbsp; The demand in RAM Connection is also the same for all load combinations.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RAM Connection: ACI Chapter 17 Seismic Ductility</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/ram-staad/f/ram-staad-forum/181443/ram-connection-aci-chapter-17-seismic-ductility</link><pubDate>Fri, 21 Jun 2019 13:34:02 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:eb20d41e-d6d2-404c-b97d-afdec3fbb8af</guid><dc:creator>KB</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;How does RAM Connection Baseplate handle the seismic ductility requirements for ACI Appendix D (Chapter 17)? Our typical buildings are SDC C with R=3. When I run the Connection module for projects, I do not see options relating to these requirements given.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Ask A Question I</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/achievements/460ac7df-7ccc-4c42-a204-9e05eef3be09</link><pubDate>Fri, 21 Jun 2019 01:51:11 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:e83e1bbe-4e00-4fa5-a3a9-e7ed2dc5c40c</guid><dc:creator /><description>Ask a question in a forum.</description></item><item><title>Ram Connection Standalone: Anchors in Invalid Positions</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/ram-staad/f/ram-staad-forum/132702/ram-connection-standalone-anchors-in-invalid-positions</link><pubDate>Thu, 09 Mar 2017 15:48:42 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:6f8512a1-d2c7-4c59-b2db-2b45442ca7e9</guid><dc:creator>KB</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Ram Connection Standalone: In a double angle connection to a column flange, using (2)L5x3x3/8, long leg on supported member, &amp;nbsp;bolted to beam and welded to column flange, I get an error of &amp;#39;anchors in invalid positions&amp;#39;. &amp;nbsp;I have check the a=3&amp;quot; and edge distances are ok, any other ideas what this error references?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Seismic Load Effects in RAM for non lateral members</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/ram-staad/f/ram-staad-forum/123206/seismic-load-effects-in-ram-for-non-lateral-members</link><pubDate>Tue, 28 Jun 2016 20:42:15 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:3c16f58f-767b-4a9d-8a25-7d708d2c2591</guid><dc:creator>KB</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Does RAM do anything to account for vertical or horizontal Seismic Load Effects (ASCE 7/10-12.4) for non-lateral members? &amp;nbsp;Has the decision been made that they will not often control for members outside of the seismic resisting system? &amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>