<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://communities.bentley.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><channel><title>Sean Johnson's Communities Activities</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/members/49e21ee3_2d00_b7de_2d00_412d_2d00_90ef_2d00_1c2dbf56d071</link><description>Recent activity for people in Sean Johnson's community</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 12</generator><item><title>Plaxis: Site response facility</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/geotech-analysis/f/forum/219198/plaxis-site-response-facility</link><pubDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2021 09:06:34 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:4413274a-ee9c-475b-8fd4-3b2d521335e2</guid><dc:creator>원호 정</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I have a query about Plaxis 2D (v.21 Ultimate) Site Response function that can be used for 1D Site Response Analysis (SRA). When we select &amp;ldquo;Site Response&amp;rdquo; from the &amp;ldquo;Modify soil layers&amp;rdquo; menu, Plaxis automatically converts the main geometry of the model into 1D geometry and the meshing is also done with 6-noded elements.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I would like to know, whether such meshing is OK for the Site Response Analysis, OR I have to modify the mesh size as suggested in Plaxis 2D (2015) Ground Response Analysis report, i.e., the suggestion of Kuhlmeyer &amp;amp; Lysmer (1973).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Secondly, I would like to know whether the following conditions are OK while selecting dynamic loading.&lt;br /&gt;The Static Line displacement (U_x,start,ref) in the Dynamic module should be,&lt;br /&gt;1) U_x,start,ref = 0.5 m ; In case of Rock outcrop motion ?&lt;br /&gt;2) U_x,start,ref = 1.0 m ; In case of Bedrock (underlying of soil layer) motion ?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Criteria for Dynamic Slope Failure</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/geotech-analysis/f/forum/228064/criteria-for-dynamic-slope-failure</link><pubDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2022 16:43:06 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:4dfad889-583a-448d-949d-10ad1cfb4996</guid><dc:creator>Mustafa Erten</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I am using PLAXIS 2D to perform earthquake time-history analysis for a slope using different accelerograms. As a result of this analysis, I will need to estimate the potential volume of soil that may fail and mobilize as a result of the earthquake event. Could you please help me on what criteria to use to identify to potential soil failure surface? I was thinking of using a horizontal displacement criteria but I am not sure what displacement to use to identify fail/unfail situation. I can also look at the cartesian strains but I am not sure about what limiting value to use.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Could you please provide some guidance or may be direct me to some references which dealt with the same type of problem?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Adding damping values in a dynamic analysis</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/geotech-analysis/f/forum/228171/adding-damping-values-in-a-dynamic-analysis</link><pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2022 14:03:11 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:e1737db7-6ade-4815-a39a-d899a10dfb83</guid><dc:creator>Jack Rice</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I have a pile in a block of sand, with a horizontal load being applied at the top of the pile for 7 seconds, then being released allowing free vibration for 13 seconds. I added 1% damping to the pile and 0.6% damping to the soil materials. After this, the output computes no displacements in either stage of the analysis - loading or vibration. Without the damping values applied I get increased displacement until the load is deactivated, and then slowly decaying oscillations due to geometric dissipation. I expect to see the same output when I add the rayleigh damping values, except the oscillations should decay more. Why am I getting flat lines and how can I apply damping correctly?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>The Geosynthetic-Reinforced Pile-Supported (GRPS) embankments under dynamic loads</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/geotech-analysis/f/forum/226545/the-geosynthetic-reinforced-pile-supported-grps-embankments-under-dynamic-loads</link><pubDate>Wed, 02 Mar 2022 23:45:42 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:25703455-40f1-40b2-b04a-c1d68bb0d33a</guid><dc:creator>rashad alsirawan</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi all&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A validation process of&amp;nbsp; GRPS embankment (over soft soil layers) under static loads was conducted, HS and SSC models are utilized to simulate the behavior of the embankment with a good agreement.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;can we apply the traffic load (dynamic analysis) if the model was validated under static loads? If yes, Do HS or SSC models work in the Dynamic analysis?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;thanks in advance&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Dynamic loading in PLAXIS</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/geotech-analysis/f/forum/226738/dynamic-loading-in-plaxis</link><pubDate>Tue, 08 Mar 2022 06:12:21 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:d4ba8dac-f586-47b6-b04a-f56d7fe6082e</guid><dc:creator>Aamir Gulzar</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;How can I place the earthquake load within the model?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Is it possible with the surface prescribed displacements?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Should I be using free field and complaint base boundaries while using line prescribed displacements for earthquake simulation?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Global acceleration - Pseudo static input</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/geotech-analysis/f/forum/224346/global-acceleration---pseudo-static-input</link><pubDate>Sun, 09 Jan 2022 21:49:50 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:e735367d-1825-41d2-a429-a7701fb1d4e1</guid><dc:creator>AHMED ABD ELSHAKOUR</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hello,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;First of all, I want to thank&amp;nbsp;you very much, every single one who works in the technical support of the Bentley communities, the quick respond, the efficiency, the Bentley Communities is perfect&amp;nbsp; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;My problem is that I am running a dynamic phase, earthquake by a time history applied by means of prescribed displacement to the bottom boundary. Followed by a plastic phase, which I need to take into account the deformations that took place in the dynamic phase. So. I will use the pseudo static option in the model conditions at the plastic phase.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So I was asking how to calculate the global acceleration in every direction (x, y &amp;amp;z), Should I calculate it from the dynamic phase !? but at which node in the whole model !?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img alt=" " src="/resized-image/__size/320x240/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/343671/pastedimage1641764996691v1.png" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Sincerely,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Ahmed Abd Elshakour&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Pseudo static input</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/geotech-analysis/f/forum/224788/pseudo-static-input</link><pubDate>Wed, 19 Jan 2022 17:30:11 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:83ff5ce4-692a-4789-a93e-dc8fead7630e</guid><dc:creator>AHMED ABD ELSHAKOUR</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hello,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I am running a dynamic phase, earthquake by a time history applied by means of prescribed displacement to the bottom boundary. The dynamic phase is followed by a plastic phase, I need the dynamic phase deformations to have an effect on the plastic phase . So. I will use the pseudo static option in the model conditions at the plastic phase.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So I was asking how to calculate the global acceleration in every direction (x, y &amp;amp;z)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Sincerely,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Ahmed Abd Elshakour&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Pseudo static</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/geotech-analysis/f/forum/224894/pseudo-static</link><pubDate>Fri, 21 Jan 2022 15:40:02 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:08ff3bac-b1f9-4dcf-9e96-509824a331e2</guid><dc:creator>AHMED ABD ELSHAKOUR</dc:creator><description>&lt;meta content="text/html; charset=us-ascii" /&gt;


&lt;div style="color:rgb(33, 33, 33);background-color:rgb(255, 255, 255);" dir="auto"&gt;
&lt;p style="margin-top:0px;color:rgb(0, 0, 0);font-family:Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;font-size:12px;"&gt;
Hello,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p style="color:rgb(0, 0, 0);font-family:Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;font-size:12px;"&gt;
I am running a dynamic phase, earthquake by a time history applied by means of prescribed displacement to the bottom boundary. The dynamic phase is followed by a plastic phase, I need the dynamic phase deformations to have an effect on the plastic phase . So.
 I will use the pseudo static option in the model conditions at the plastic phase.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p style="color:rgb(0, 0, 0);font-family:Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;font-size:12px;"&gt;
So I was asking how to calculate the global acceleration in every direction (x, y &amp;amp;z)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p style="color:rgb(0, 0, 0);font-family:Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;font-size:12px;"&gt;
Sincerely,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p style="color:rgb(0, 0, 0);font-family:Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;font-size:12px;"&gt;
Ahmed Abd Elshakour&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div id="ms-outlook-mobile-signature" dir="auto"&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
Get &lt;a href="https://aka.ms/AAb9ysg"&gt;Outlook for Android&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Earthquake input value</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/geotech-analysis/f/forum/224310/earthquake-input-value</link><pubDate>Fri, 07 Jan 2022 14:26:15 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:4f36a004-1ee1-4689-9a0c-f8e61be08070</guid><dc:creator>AHMED ABD ELSHAKOUR</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hello,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The dynamic loading is specified by means of an input value and a multiplier. The actual dynamic value at each time step equals to the input value times the multiplier.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;As an example, the earthquake analysis problem in the tutorial manual, the earthquake is simulated by a dynamic prescribed displacement&amp;nbsp; of&amp;nbsp;a value 0.5m as in the figure below&lt;br /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;img src="/resized-image/__size/320x240/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/343671/pastedimage1641564568864v2.png" alt=" " /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;the multiplier is a time-history (strong motion CD-ROM) which its peak acceleration is 2.399m/s2 and the time interval input is 20s. the categorizing of this earthquake is empirically &amp;quot;between 6 to 6.9 Richter&amp;quot; and the perceived shaking is &amp;quot;very strong&amp;quot;, and if we use scaling factor 2 and 3,the categorizing will be like that&lt;br /&gt;&lt;img src="/resized-image/__size/320x240/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/343671/pastedimage1641564299459v1.png" alt=" " /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;this table is considered empirical not an accurate.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;However,&amp;nbsp;as it is mentioned in&amp;nbsp;the reference manual &amp;quot;The actual dynamic value at each time step equals to the input value times the multiplier&amp;quot;. So, the input value 0.5m has an influence on the categorizing of the earthquake!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So, my question is the input value of the dynamic prescribed displacement , what it actually means!? is it a component of the earthquake!?&lt;br /&gt;and if I want to categorize the earthquake by the its peak acceleration, how can I calculate its actual value?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;sincerely,&lt;br /&gt;Ahmed Abd elsakour&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>prescribed displacement force value separetely from any other prescribed displacement in the same phase</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/geotech-analysis/f/forum/221205/prescribed-displacement-force-value-separetely-from-any-other-prescribed-displacement-in-the-same-phase</link><pubDate>Sun, 24 Oct 2021 10:56:29 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:32fe5abc-d46f-4956-9ddc-6f4fb5bd6166</guid><dc:creator>AHMED ABD ELSHAKOUR</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;If there are two prescribed displacements at the same phase, one of them is static (shallow foundation) and the other is dynamic (time-history analysis), can I get the force of the static prescribed displacement by any way other than ( curves manager - project - Fz ) ..because it is in this case combined of the static and the dynamic prescribed displacement not only the static.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Let me Help You</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/achievements/687f4b6d-e18a-4e55-836c-49926ca2c9d9</link><pubDate>Fri, 29 Oct 2021 12:29:01 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:6a252e61-c3ef-4947-9046-7c9383e2255d</guid><dc:creator /><description>Answer a question that is verified as helpful or correct.</description></item></channel></rss>