<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://communities.bentley.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><channel><title>Soham Mhaskar's Activities</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/members/4a893506_2d00_e40e_2d00_484c_2d00_8b61_2d00_11e5c5696753</link><description>Soham Mhaskar's recent activity</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 12</generator><item><title>How to set Precision for Pipe Bend in Isometric Output of OPIM CE</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/plant/w/plant_design_and_engineering__wiki/52434/how-to-set-precision-for-pipe-bend-in-isometric-output-of-opim-ce</link><pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2020 14:17:48 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:9456346d-4ce1-42ca-b673-3a065450554e</guid><dc:creator>Rahul Kumar</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img alt=" " height="60" src="/cfs-file.ashx/__key/communityserver-components-sitefiles/TSG-Logo.png" width="189" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;table style="background-color:#dce5f0;border:0px solid #dce5f0;" border="0"&gt;
&lt;tbody&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;td&gt;Applies To&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;OpenPlant CONNECT Edition&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;td&gt;Product(s):&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;OpenPlant Isometrics Manager&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;td&gt;Version(s):&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;CONNECT EDITION&amp;nbsp;Update 8 &amp;amp; above&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;td&gt;Environment:&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;Windows 10 (64 bit)&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;td&gt;Area:&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;Styles&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;td&gt;Subarea:&amp;nbsp;&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;User labels&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;td&gt;Original Author:&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;Soham Mhaskar, Bentley Global Technical Support&amp;nbsp;&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;/tbody&gt;
&lt;/table&gt;
&lt;h1&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:150%;"&gt;Background&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/h1&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When there is a requirement in which the precision must be set for&amp;nbsp;Pipe Bend Angle in Isometrics Output, this wiki would be helpful in achieving the desired result.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h1&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:150%;"&gt;Steps to Accomplish&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/h1&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ol&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Open Isometrics Configuration inside OpenPlant Isometrics Manager CE and modify labels like shown below.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;R=$(BRADIUS:#.0)$$(IE_BANGLE:#.0)&amp;deg;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Here, it means 1 digit after Decimal Point.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;img alt=" " src="/resized-image/__size/800x600/__key/communityserver-wikis-components-files/00-00-00-00-43/54006.jpg" /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;For Example, (IE_BANGLE:#.##) means 2 digits after Decimal Point and so on.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;strong&gt;S&lt;/strong&gt;ave and Close OPIM Configuration.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Open OpenPlant Modeler CE and Generate Isometric Output to get the Desired Result.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;img alt=" " src="/resized-image/__size/940x680/__key/communityserver-wikis-components-files/00-00-00-00-43/2783.p7.png" /&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ol&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h1&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:150%;"&gt;See Also&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/h1&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:150%;"&gt;&lt;a href="https://communities.bentley.com/products/plant/w/plant_design_and_engineering__wiki/52433/how-to-set-precision-for-trimmed-elbows-in-isometric-output-of-opim-ce"&gt;communities.bentley.com/.../how-to-set-precision-for-trimmed-elbows-in-isometric-output-of-opim-ce&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:150%;"&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h1&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:150%;"&gt;Still a Problem?&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/h1&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If above problem still persists, then please create a Service Request and contact the Bentley Global&amp;nbsp;Technical Support Group. &amp;nbsp;Please include a list of all relevant details to get in depth analysis for a solution or workaround.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h1&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:150%;"&gt;Comments or Corrections?&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/h1&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Bentley&amp;#39;s Global Technical Support Group requests that you please confine any comments you have on this Wiki entry to this Comments or Corrections?&amp;quot; section. THANK YOU!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Bolt-Length Calculation [OPM – 10.07.00.32]</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/plant/f/autoplant-axsys-openplant-plantwise-forum/197269/bolt-length-calculation-opm-10-07-00-32</link><pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2020 08:01:46 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:9f82d25f-a155-40dc-b6ac-ad466634af87</guid><dc:creator>Florian S.</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hello everybody,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;For your convenience, a &amp;ldquo;too long did not read&amp;rdquo;:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I think the algorythm to choose a correct bolt length is not working correctly together with the Increment value &amp;ldquo;BOLT_INC&amp;rdquo;. It produces wrong values and does not represent the way a bolt length is picked in reality.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;System Setup:&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;OpenPlant Modeler - Connect Edition Update 7 [10.07.00.32]&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Metric WorkSet (It is customized for our company, but there have been no changes to any bolt-related operation.)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Explenation of my concerns:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I am looking into the bolt-length calculation in OpenPlant Modeler, especially the handling of the Bolt-Increment Value.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I imagined the value as a kind of representation in which increments I can get my bolts from the supplier. For example these increments could be as follows. &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; Until a length of 80&amp;nbsp;mm you can get them in increments of 5&amp;nbsp;mm. &lt;br /&gt; From 80&amp;nbsp;mm until 200&amp;nbsp;mm increments of 10&amp;nbsp;mm. &lt;br /&gt; And above 200&amp;nbsp;mm increments of 20&amp;nbsp;mm.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So my thought was, that the &amp;ldquo;BOLT_INC&amp;rdquo; in the specification will represent theses increment values. &lt;br /&gt;For a test I setup a specification with the possible bolts for a &lt;strong&gt;DN100 PN16 Weld-Neck-Flange connection&lt;/strong&gt;. These are M16 Bolts and my Spec-Values looked like this:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img alt="01_BoltsInSpec" src="/resized-image/__size/640x127/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/5927/01_5F00_BoltsInSpec.png" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;(Please note: The starting point for the first entry is chosen very low with a length of 5&amp;nbsp;mm. In reality there will be no M16 bolt with 5&amp;nbsp;mm length, but I chose it to have more flexibility for a first test.)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I then made a flange to flange connection in OPM to look at the bolts it chooses. &lt;br /&gt; The connection has the following values and it should be a &lt;strong&gt;calculated Bolt_Length of 61.8&amp;nbsp;mm.&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;img alt="02_Flange" src="/resized-image/__size/640x480/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/5927/02_5F00_Flange.png" /&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Now I thought: Allright, let&amp;rsquo;s see if OPM pics a length of 65&amp;nbsp;mm. &lt;br /&gt; How do I get on a value of 65? &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; For me the calculation (in a kind of pseudocode) would look like this: &lt;br /&gt; The calculated length is 61.8&amp;nbsp;mm. Is there a bolt with that length in the specification?&lt;br /&gt; No it is not there. &lt;br /&gt; Is there a Bolt with a smaller length AND an increment value which could be picked? &amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt; Yes it is there. Starting at 5&amp;nbsp;mm and with an increment value of 5. &lt;br /&gt; Start adding the increment value to that bolt, until the length is bigger than the calculated value of 61.8&amp;nbsp;mm.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Bolt Length = 5&amp;nbsp;mm + ( X-Times the Increment Value) = 5&amp;nbsp;mm + ( 12 x 5) = 65&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Otherwise, if there is no smaller Bolt with an increment value, pick a bigger length, which is nearest to the calculated length. In my case this would be a length of 80&amp;nbsp;mm.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Now what did OPM pick in reality?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img alt="03_Pickof100" src="/resized-image/__size/640x480/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/5927/03_5F00_Pickof100.png" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A length of 100???&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;How in the world does he get to a value of 100?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I then had a look back at the wiki-article which explains the bolt-calculation. &lt;br /&gt; ( &lt;a href="/products/plant/w/plant_design_and_engineering__wiki/14484/how-are-bolt-lengths-calculated-in-openplant-modeler"&gt;https://communities.bentley.com/products/plant/w/plant_design_and_engineering__wiki/14484/how-are-bolt-lengths-calculated-in-openplant-modeler&lt;/a&gt; )&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;And in the lower part of the article under the point &amp;ldquo;For General Flange Connection:&amp;rdquo; I found this sentence: &amp;ldquo; If no Bolt of current length is found after processing all the records, then we use the increment value (BOLT_INC) of the &lt;strong&gt;LAST RECORD&lt;/strong&gt; to calculate correct length.&amp;rdquo;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I tried around with changing the value a bit to find out what it means to take the LAST RECORD.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It seems that OPM really choses the Record with a length of 200&amp;nbsp;mm and goes from there. And the interesting and dumb thing is: It does a substraction of the increment value. For my example this would be starting at a length of 200&amp;nbsp;mm and going down in increments of 20. &lt;br /&gt;(Please see the additional example at the bottom of this post, that I idid to verify that behaviour.)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Now there are &lt;strong&gt;two main questions&lt;/strong&gt; (and some additional):&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ol&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Why the hell is it programmed this way that he picks the last record and goes from there?&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;If he goes from 200&amp;nbsp;mm down in 20&amp;nbsp;mm Increments, he should at least get to a value of 80&amp;nbsp;mm (for a calculated length of 61.8&amp;nbsp;mm, which would be the minimum value for the bolt). Why does he stop at 100&amp;nbsp;mm? &lt;br /&gt; And also why is this length transferred on all three Bolts of the catalog?&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ol&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So I would like to propose to &lt;strong&gt;change the algorythm behind the bolt calculation&lt;/strong&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ol&gt;
&lt;li&gt;If it does not find an entry with the calculated length directly, it should look for a lower value with an increment. In my case this would be starting at a length of 5&amp;nbsp;mm.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Then he should calculate the value with the increments until it gets bigger than the needed value. 5&amp;nbsp;mm + 12 times increment of 5 = 65&amp;nbsp;mm&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Then he should have a look if this value is still smaller then the next entry in the spec, regarding the length. In my case 65 is still smaller than 80mm, which would be the next entry. If there would be an entry with for example 63&amp;nbsp;mm, he should pick that one. &lt;br /&gt; So this would be a comparison between the needed length (61.8), the next bigger length in the spec (63 or 80, depending what is in the spec) and the length which was realized with increments (65).&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ol&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:inherit;"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Maybe a question for all of the community here: &lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:inherit;"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;How do you realize a correct picking of the bolt length?&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:inherit;"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Do you have all the available screws as an entry in your specification or do you do it in another way?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;EXAMPLE to verify that he goes from the last record and substracts the increment value:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;For this test I changed the increment value of the longest of the three bolts to an odd value of 23.8.&lt;br /&gt; The rest of the values stayed the same.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img alt=" " src="/resized-image/__size/640x480/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/5927/04_5F00_ExampleValue.png" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Again I made the DN100 PN16 Weld-Neck-Flange Connection and now the length showed a value of 104.8:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img alt="05_ExamplePick" src="/resized-image/__size/640x480/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/5927/05_5F00_ExamplePick.png" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I was confused at first, but noticed that the picked value of 104.8 equals the following calculation:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;104.8 = 200 &amp;ndash; 4 x 23.8&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So what he did is starting from the last record, which seems to be the bolt with a length of 200&amp;nbsp;mm from the spec and then keeps substracting the corresponding increment value until he reaches a value which is still greater then the other entries (in this case greated than the entry with a length of 80&amp;nbsp;mm), but bigger than the calculated value of 61.8&amp;nbsp;mm.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;p&gt;EXAMPLE FILES:&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Specification:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://communities.bentley.com/cfs-file/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/5927/TESTSPEC_5F00_Bolts.mdb"&gt;communities.bentley.com/.../TESTSPEC_5F00_Bolts.mdb&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;(The specification&amp;nbsp;was compressed and only contains necessary parts for the test, to keep the file size small.)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Example-DGN:&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://communities.bentley.com/cfs-file/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/5927/Testfile_2D00_Bolts.dgn"&gt;communities.bentley.com/.../Testfile_2D00_Bolts.dgn&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;(The example DGN contains a flange-to-flange connection, with gasket and bolts, DN100, metric WorkSet.)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>OPM CE Update 8, NO_SHEETS and PRESPLIT_NO_SHEET is incorrect</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/plant/f/autoplant-axsys-openplant-plantwise-forum/210969/opm-ce-update-8-no_sheets-and-presplit_no_sheet-is-incorrect</link><pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2021 15:50:17 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:926b9f2d-692d-4688-91c2-9dcdcb93f450</guid><dc:creator>Tuomas Takkinen</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hello all,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I have used to split one pipeline to 2 sheets by using the isometric breakpoint. I will not use any other method to split isos at the moment. For some reason OPM CE Update 8 will not calculate correctly the number of the sheets. I used that information in the drawing title to mark the correct sheet.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="/resized-image/__size/320x240/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/5927/pastedimage1615477408950v5.png" alt=" " /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="/resized-image/__size/320x240/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/5927/pastedimage1615477194786v2.png" alt=" " /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;iso sheet 1:&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="/resized-image/__size/320x240/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/5927/pastedimage1615477550445v6.png" alt=" " /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;iso sheet 2:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="/resized-image/__size/320x240/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/5927/pastedimage1615477660275v7.png" alt=" " /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The sheet numbering in the drawings should be 1 / 2 in sheet 1 and 2 / 2 in sheet 2. This configuration has worked in OPM V8i and this problem was noticed during migrating to OPM Connect Edition.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;BR&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Tuomas&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Hidden Pallet</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/plant/f/autoplant-axsys-openplant-plantwise-forum/217510/hidden-pallet</link><pubDate>Sun, 01 Aug 2021 15:33:08 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:1b4df3af-d454-4444-89cd-7e2696f98db1</guid><dc:creator>Kenneth Crowe</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I am using openplant. I have lost a pallet. It is the item browser, it is hidden somewhere. I have tried everything I know to get it back to display. Does anybody know of away to get to reappear ?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Question about EC Annotation</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/plant/f/autoplant-axsys-openplant-plantwise-forum/219379/question-about-ec-annotation</link><pubDate>Mon, 13 Sep 2021 01:29:54 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:38919130-881e-471a-a00c-4eadbb27d94c</guid><dc:creator>Shu ZHANG</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Everyone,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp; I have a question&amp;nbsp;about placing EC Annotation. The background is I added two property to pipe, called COP_M and BOP_M. which represents the height&amp;nbsp; of Center of Pipe and the height of Bottom of Pipe respectively. Then, I added two EC Annotations binding these two property respectively. However, when placing these two EC Annotations, they worked on some pipes, but didn&amp;#39;t work on some others.&amp;nbsp;&lt;img alt=" " src="/resized-image/__size/1080x1080/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/5927/4152._5563B783_.PNG" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Anyone has any idea of why this happened?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>OPIM V8i - FFW Note Not in Iso</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/plant/f/autoplant-axsys-openplant-plantwise-forum/219081/opim-v8i---ffw-note-not-in-iso</link><pubDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2021 07:27:18 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:a9a40365-46de-45b1-9bb1-149ff9ed231e</guid><dc:creator>Bear</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="/resized-image/__size/320x240/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/5927/pastedimage1630913175299v1.png" alt=" " /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I&amp;#39;m getting this happen in a few places. I&amp;#39;ve tried redoing the connection spheres and nothing seems to work.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The weld note only seems to come out in some locations. Is there any restriction on pipe length to make this happen?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Weld symbol for FFW weld comes out fine, only note effected.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Any suggestions welcome.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>How to display tool bar</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/plant/f/autoplant-axsys-openplant-plantwise-forum/217855/how-to-display-tool-bar</link><pubDate>Mon, 09 Aug 2021 08:32:37 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:418d8c20-47d6-4d0c-b2ed-5ee3c6e8174e</guid><dc:creator>Tuje Akpoguma</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Good day all,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Please i cannot fine my pipe tool bar display on my window and on tool pallate. Please how do i bring it back.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;My regards,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Tuje.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>How to use/import open plant spec in auto-plant</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/plant/f/autoplant-axsys-openplant-plantwise-forum/218197/how-to-use-import-open-plant-spec-in-auto-plant</link><pubDate>Mon, 16 Aug 2021 09:06:53 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:f5aaf245-6eb3-4ebd-9d14-619b6927b760</guid><dc:creator>Adinath Mundhe</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;1) What is difference between open-plant &amp;amp; auto-plant specification&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;2) How specification are work in Background&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;3) Can i used open-plant specification in&amp;nbsp;Auto-plant&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>APPID TO OPPID CONVERSTION VALVE SYMBOL</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/plant/f/autoplant-axsys-openplant-plantwise-forum/218189/appid-to-oppid-converstion-valve-symbol</link><pubDate>Mon, 16 Aug 2021 07:01:28 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:b28d6af2-70eb-4c86-812e-016bf4110e09</guid><dc:creator>Rajesh K</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:150%;"&gt;HI,&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:150%;"&gt;While I conversation from APPID TO OPPID, valve symbols and valve tags are mismatch from APPID, OPPID DRGS what should I do for this&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="/resized-image/__size/320x240/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/5927/pastedimage1629097284548v1.png" alt=" " /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>How to solve Isometric dimension text error</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/plant/f/autoplant-axsys-openplant-plantwise-forum/217970/how-to-solve-isometric-dimension-text-error</link><pubDate>Wed, 11 Aug 2021 06:25:02 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:a454dd36-f5b6-4638-ada4-cd86dc136951</guid><dc:creator>Adinath Mundhe</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Dear All,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Can anyone help me to solve this dimension text error, For that Please find below attachment&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="/resized-image/__size/640x480/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/5927/pastedimage1628663099696v1.png" alt=" " /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>How to modify the size of nozzle in OPPID CE?</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/plant/f/autoplant-axsys-openplant-plantwise-forum/217089/how-to-modify-the-size-of-nozzle-in-oppid-ce</link><pubDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2021 07:29:33 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:97833341-e85f-4cc1-ac4c-66624c03cceb</guid><dc:creator>Shu ZHANG</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I am wondering how to modify the size of nozzle when connecting pipeline and equipment, what we want is a smaller connecting point than the default one.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="/resized-image/__size/320x240/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/5927/pastedimage1627025031498v1.png" alt=" " /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>User defined equipment to Autoplant I-model composer shown error</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/plant/f/autoplant-axsys-openplant-plantwise-forum/216737/user-defined-equipment-to-autoplant-i-model-composer-shown-error</link><pubDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2021 11:58:54 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:71d84883-3772-48dc-a2b1-4ea56bea2cb2</guid><dc:creator>Rajesh K</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I did a model in an auto plant, want to convert using i-model composer to publish the drawing shown error like this.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;img src="/resized-image/__size/320x240/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/5927/pastedimage1626350268500v2.png" alt=" " /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>OPM Formula to change Cell Name to subelement level name</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/plant/f/autoplant-axsys-openplant-plantwise-forum/216800/opm-formula-to-change-cell-name-to-subelement-level-name</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 Jul 2021 12:19:07 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:08c12ee7-980f-4931-a0cb-907da3052d54</guid><dc:creator>Christopher Ecker</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hello everyone,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;i would like to write a code which is naming all cells in a 3D dgn according to the level which the subelements of the specific cell are placed on. I know that it may be the case that the level of the subelements are different. In this case the code should just name the cell according to any subelement level.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I already could find the below written code in the bentley forum (&lt;a href="/products/plant/f/autoplant-axsys-openplant-plantwise-forum/171453/opm-formula-to-catch-name-to-cell-name"&gt;OPM Formula to catch Name to cell name - AutoPLANT | OpenPlant | PlantWise Forum - AutoPLANT | OpenPlant | PlantWise - Bentley Communities&lt;/a&gt;) which is nearly already the solution. The Problem is that this code is using a property information of the cell to name the cell. I have to get the property information from the subelements and not from&amp;nbsp;the cell itself since the property &amp;quot;level&amp;quot; does not exists for cells.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So simply said, i am looking for a code simular like &amp;quot;&amp;nbsp;&lt;span&gt;GetCellProperty(Mycell, &amp;quot;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt;Property&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt;&amp;quot;) &amp;quot;&lt;/span&gt;&amp;nbsp;but which allows me to&amp;nbsp;reach the properties of the subelements of a cell. So something like &amp;quot;&amp;nbsp;&lt;span&gt;GetCellSubElementProperty(Mycell, &amp;quot;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt;Property&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt;&amp;quot;) &amp;quot;.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;Does anyone know how to do it? The rest of the code i should be able to change myself (hopefully :)).&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;I am grateful for any tips. Thanks in advance.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;pre class="ui-code" data-mode="text"&gt;Sub FillCellNameAsTag()
    Dim Mycell As CellElement
    
    Dim ee As ElementEnumerator
    Dim sc As New ElementScanCriteria
    
    sc.ExcludeAllTypes
    sc.IncludeType msdElementTypeCellHeader
    Set MyEnum = ActiveModelReference.Scan(sc)
    
    Do While MyEnum.MoveNext
        Set Mycell = MyEnum.Current
        Select Case GetCellProperty(Mycell, &amp;quot;SUPPORT_NAME&amp;quot;)
               Case &amp;quot;NotAvailable&amp;quot;
               Case Else
                    SetCellProperty Mycell, &amp;quot;CellName&amp;quot;, GetCellProperty(Mycell, &amp;quot;NAME&amp;quot;)
        End Select
    Loop
End Sub

Function GetCellProperty(CellEle As Element, PropertyNameString As String) As String
    Dim OPH As PropertyHandler
    Set OPH = CreatePropertyHandler(CellEle)
    On Error Resume Next
    GetCellProperty = &amp;quot;NotAvailable&amp;quot;
    OPH.SelectByAccessString (PropertyNameString)
    GetCellProperty = OPH.GetValue
End Function

Sub SetCellProperty(CellEle As Element, PropertyNameString As String, PropertyValue As String)
    Dim OPH As PropertyHandler
    Set OPH = CreatePropertyHandler(CellEle)
    OPH.SelectByAccessString (PropertyNameString)
    OPH.SetValue PropertyValue
End Sub&lt;/pre&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>OPIM V8i - Label Offset from Leader</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/plant/f/autoplant-axsys-openplant-plantwise-forum/216582/opim-v8i---label-offset-from-leader</link><pubDate>Tue, 13 Jul 2021 06:35:26 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:d1baa164-5014-4162-aab9-84cd97f223a7</guid><dc:creator>Bear</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;What controls the distance from the leader to the note cell in OPIM?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thanks,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>OPM V8i - Insulation on Valves and Flanges</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/plant/f/autoplant-axsys-openplant-plantwise-forum/214403/opm-v8i---insulation-on-valves-and-flanges</link><pubDate>Wed, 26 May 2021 01:23:04 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:8beca64a-c107-4cc8-87f3-3c645a892d38</guid><dc:creator>Bear</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Is there a way you can lock out the ability to have insulation on for flanges and valves?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>