<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://communities.bentley.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><channel><title>Euan Murray's Activities</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/members/4c447e8f_2d00_76ae_2d00_48c7_2d00_9cca_2d00_11cfa0560224</link><description>Euan Murray's recent activity</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 12</generator><item><title>Profile by slope/vertical offset</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/road___site_design/f/geopak-inroads-mx-openroads-forum/236966/profile-by-slope-vertical-offset</link><pubDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2022 10:14:30 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:919faa1c-bfbf-406b-9604-daebf3f2ad92</guid><dc:creator>Ken Bagnall</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I get strange results sometimes when using Profile by slope / variable slope / vertical offset where the result has kinks in it. Infact I avoid vertical offset because I usually end up with this result.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The recent example is linear variable slope which references a centreline and projects onto a channel which gradually moves away from the centreline (i.e. not parallel).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img height="259" src="/resized-image/__size/320x240/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/5922/pastedimage1665742250975v1.png" width="751" alt=" " /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Is there something I&amp;#39;m missing? Best practice? Or are these tools just temperamental. I sometimes get the same result with Project Profile to Element if I choose All points but this is resolved by choosing Vertices instead.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>How to stop the selected Design Standard from dropping</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/road___site_design/f/geopak-inroads-mx-openroads-forum/246089/how-to-stop-the-selected-design-standard-from-dropping</link><pubDate>Fri, 02 Jun 2023 09:42:03 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:4d26a9db-c4f4-43c9-bffd-dd7aa1acdf1a</guid><dc:creator>Euan Murray</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Using ORD 2021R1&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When working in geometry, is there a way to stop the selected Design Standard from dropping in the toolbar if you do absolutely anything other than continuously create geometry?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thanks&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Euan&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>ORD Carriageway Tie-in Best-Practice</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/road___site_design/f/geopak-inroads-mx-openroads-forum/233125/ord-carriageway-tie-in-best-practice</link><pubDate>Tue, 26 Jul 2022 13:17:07 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:ccaf5286-d2e1-478d-a312-523f8b5a1e6a</guid><dc:creator>Euan Murray</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hello,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I have reached the point in my project where I need to tie-in the carriageway (dual carriageway, channels and lane markings, both ends of the alignment, so 20 elements which must be aligned&amp;nbsp;both horizontally and vertically)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I have searched the training and the communities, and haven&amp;#39;t been able to find anything that goes through the best way to model these tie-ins to existing, how best to measure the required existing dimensions relative to the geometry.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Can anyone provide any guidance, or point me in the right direction?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Euan&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Managed Workspace setup for new user not working</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/road___site_design/f/geopak-inroads-mx-openroads-forum/235179/managed-workspace-setup-for-new-user-not-working</link><pubDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2022 11:31:10 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:d38fdfa0-b32a-4821-b0dd-c77da38d25e5</guid><dc:creator>Euan Murray</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Good afternoon.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;We have a new OpenRoads user, and following installation of OpenRoads Designer 2021 R2 (fresh install, no previous versions) they then edited&amp;nbsp;&lt;strong&gt;_USTN_CUSTOM_CONFIGURATION&lt;/strong&gt; in &lt;strong&gt;C:\ProgramData\Bentley\OpenRoads Designer CE 10.10\Configuration\ConfigurationSetup.cfg&lt;/strong&gt; as below, so that they have access to the managed workspace on our server:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="/resized-image/__size/320x240/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/5922/pastedimage1662550241362v2.png" alt=" " /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This is the same setting as I and other users have, but the managed workspace is not appearing in their workspace list.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Have I missed a setting somewhere that it isn&amp;#39;t picking up the change?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thanks,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Euan&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Horizontal Geometry Glitches on Reference Refresh</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/road___site_design/f/geopak-inroads-mx-openroads-forum/233507/horizontal-geometry-glitches-on-reference-refresh</link><pubDate>Wed, 03 Aug 2022 10:17:42 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:b6201c14-3bd6-439b-92f6-f23de1eaf611</guid><dc:creator>Euan Murray</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I have a horizontal layout for my merges and diverges, with dimensions&amp;nbsp;per DMRB CD 122, as follows:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Nose taper using Ratio Offset Taper for length and nose ratio&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Nose carriageway using Single Offset Entire Element for the carriageway width&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Merge/diverge taper using Variable Offset Taper for the length and offsets&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;1000m radius between the Merge/Diverge taper and the mainline carriageway edge using Arc Between Elements &amp;gt; Simple Arc for the mainline tie-in&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;1000m radius between the Nose carriageway and Merge/Diverge taper elements to smooth the carriageway edge through the angle&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I have found in several instances (3 out of 8 layouts in my current design), that no matter what I use for the final element, either&amp;nbsp;&lt;span&gt;using Arc Between Elements &amp;gt; Simple Arc or Arc Between Elements, or what order the elements have been selected as back and ahead, when the mainline reference is reloaded, or simply upon opening the model at the start of the day, the horizontal solution glitches, either giving the &amp;quot;Invalid&amp;nbsp;Element. Uable to solve rule please correct element construction&amp;quot; error message or moving the acr to a different solution location.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;The designed solution (north radius is 500m due to the mainline alignment in this situation):&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;&lt;img src="/resized-image/__size/320x240/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/5922/pastedimage1659521212296v1.png" alt=" " /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;Once refreshed:&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;&lt;img src="/resized-image/__size/320x240/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/5922/pastedimage1659521450788v2.png" alt=" " /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;The glitches can be resolved by selecting the complex and amneding the arc value to R1001m and then back to R1000m, or by dragging the arc midpoint grip, but I cannot find a way to prevent this glitch happening.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;Does anyone have a similar experience and a way to prevent this happening?&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Report the crossfall, distance etc. between 2 linear elements</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/road___site_design/f/geopak-inroads-mx-openroads-forum/233204/report-the-crossfall-distance-etc-between-2-linear-elements</link><pubDate>Wed, 27 Jul 2022 21:36:42 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:1fe96af1-9c2a-4302-8670-8ad502c82b6e</guid><dc:creator>Ken Bagnall</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;As a previous MX user I am use to a couple of tools to be able to quickly check a crossfall, distance etc. between 2 linear elements at specific points/stations.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I suspect after doing research I know what the answer will be but is there a way to do this in ORD yet? Seems pretty fundamental and something I use to use a lot.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;For clarification, I know using dynamic sections is useful for checking these things within a single corridor perpendicularly and I have also tried drawing a line in plan to project the things I&amp;#39;m interested in onto its profile. I am also aware of the base station crossfall report, the MicroStation measure tool (only good for distances) as well as analzye between 2 points (limited to terrains which I don&amp;#39;t always have) but these methods are slow, limited and cumbersome. I need to be able to do it on the fly with the linear geometry of a model without relying on there being a terrain, a single corridor or running a full report just for one quick measurement.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Regards,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Ken&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Slope to Target not creating 2D element</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/road___site_design/f/geopak-inroads-mx-openroads-forum/233310/slope-to-target-not-creating-2d-element</link><pubDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2022 13:07:18 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:c1874000-3666-4b93-9d2f-3effe523042f</guid><dc:creator>Euan Murray</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;When using &amp;quot;Create 3D by Slope to Target&amp;quot; in order to model the interface to a construction terrain the 3D element is created, but there&amp;#39;s no equivalent element created in the 2D display.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It&amp;#39;s not the end of the world, I can work with the 3D element for creating the design surface, but I&amp;#39;ve not seen any other linear element not have a 2D equivalent, and I&amp;#39;ve tried multiple features.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I&amp;#39;m doing it this way because I can&amp;#39;t find any way to create the interface of two slopes, or to add the construction surface to the interface point using Alternate Surface in the template editor (and there&amp;#39;s several terrains in the model that could be listed, but there&amp;#39;s none.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Using ORD 2021 R2 U10 (10.10.20.78)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>ORD DWG Export Workflows</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/road___site_design/f/geopak-inroads-mx-openroads-forum/169182/ord-dwg-export-workflows</link><pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2018 12:04:41 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:6c87bf00-0558-4f3f-9ef5-856f7474bfe0</guid><dc:creator>Mark Shamoun</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi guys,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I&amp;#39;m trying to set up some standard ORD DWG export processes for my organization and have only found a few methods to get the outputs I require without issues that require extensive post-processing to be good enough for delivery. Plan exports are a bit convoluted to get past the issue of elements exporting with no symbology after&amp;nbsp;splitting strings with gaps during export, but it gets us close to what we want -&amp;nbsp; unfortunately many issues regarding annotation values changing on export. Ideally i&amp;#39;d love us to be using Microstation to take advantage of the native dynamics, but unfortunately our market is&amp;nbsp;primarily AutoCAD for drafting.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Here&amp;#39;s what i&amp;#39;ve come up with so far using ORD 2018 R3;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="text-decoration:line-through;"&gt;&lt;span style="background-color:#ffff00;"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;*UPDATE* - A few improvements in ORD 2018 R4 meaning less custom processes&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="background-color:#00ff00;"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;*UPDATE* - More improvements in ORD 2021 R1 and R2&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="text-decoration:line-through;"&gt;&lt;span style="text-decoration:underline;"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;2D Alignment Plan export with Annotation&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;strong&gt; - &lt;/strong&gt;&lt;span style="background-color:#ccffff;"&gt;process required to export chainage annotation&lt;strong&gt;:&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="text-decoration:line-through;"&gt;Steps:&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="text-decoration:line-through;"&gt;1. Open new DGN using 2D seed&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="text-decoration:line-through;"&gt;2. Reference in Default model with no nesting&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="text-decoration:line-through;"&gt;3. Turn off display of unnecessary levels&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="text-decoration:line-through;"&gt;4. Create Fence around data&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="text-decoration:line-through;"&gt;5. Deactivate Auto Field Update using &amp;quot;EXPAND SET MS_AUTO_UPDATE_FIELDS = NEVER&amp;quot; keyin&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="text-decoration:line-through;"&gt;6. Use Fence to File command to copy contents to new DGN&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="text-decoration:line-through;"&gt;7. Open New DGN&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="text-decoration:line-through;"&gt;8. Select all Annotation Cells (named &amp;quot;DrawTextAnnotation&amp;quot;) and drop&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="text-decoration:line-through;"&gt;9. Select all Text Nodes and drop (this seems to allow correct export of field values)&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="text-decoration:line-through;"&gt;10. Export to DWG&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="text-decoration:line-through;"&gt;11. Reactivate Auto Field Update using &amp;quot;EXPAND SET MS_AUTO_UPDATE_FIELDS = ALWAYS&amp;quot; keyin&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="text-decoration:line-through;"&gt;&lt;span style="background-color:#ccffcc;"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Note:&lt;/strong&gt; You can start the process from your live DGN Default (2D) model and skip points 1 and 2 if you don&amp;#39;t mind changing many level display settings in your live file. We keep a DGN saved for export levels already preset.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="text-decoration:underline;"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;3D DWG Plan export&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;strong&gt; &lt;/strong&gt;- &lt;span style="background-color:#ccffff;"&gt;&lt;span style="text-decoration:line-through;"&gt;process required when model includes string gaps and clipping, etc.:&lt;/span&gt; &lt;span style="background-color:#00ff00;"&gt;Normal DWG export is now resolved, although this process gives a cleaner result (WYSIWYG)&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Steps:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;1. Open new DGN using 3D seed (or 2D for flattened DWG)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;2. Reference in Default-3D model with no nesting&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;3. Turn off display of unnecessary levels&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;4. Create Fence around data&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;5. Use Fence to File command to copy contents to new DGN&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;6. Open New DGN&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="text-decoration:line-through;"&gt;4. Select all Complex Chains and drop (required to avoid dropped chains being put on layer 0 by default)&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;5. Export to DWG&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="background-color:#ccffcc;"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Note:&lt;/strong&gt; If you want a 3d DWG and don&amp;#39;t mind changing many level display settings in your live file, you can start the process from your live DGN Default-3D model and skip points 1 and 2. We keep a DGN saved for export levels already preset.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="text-decoration:underline;"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="text-decoration:underline;"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Cross section DWG export :&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;*Required DWG Export options:&lt;em&gt; &lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;em&gt;References &amp;gt; External Attachments: Merge or Merge to Cell &lt;/em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;(required to get sheet borders to export) &lt;span style="text-decoration:line-through;"&gt;-&amp;nbsp;&lt;span style="color:#ff0000;text-decoration:line-through;"&gt;RESULTS IN&amp;nbsp;AN EXPORT ERROR IF 2D/3D models included in dwg export model filter&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;span style="color:#ff0000;"&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;em&gt;References &amp;gt; Non-Default Models Attachments: Merge or Merge to Cell &lt;strong&gt;(required to get sheets to export with cross section drawing attachments&lt;/strong&gt;)&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;em&gt;References &amp;gt;&amp;nbsp;Merge Visible Edges of 3D Attachments:&amp;nbsp;ENABLED&lt;/em&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;strong&gt;(required to avoid error exporting cross section drawings)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;em&gt;References &amp;gt;&amp;nbsp;Merge Viewport&amp;nbsp;Attachments:&amp;nbsp;ENABLED&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;em&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;strong&gt;(to avoid&amp;nbsp;an&amp;nbsp;export error if&amp;nbsp;2D/3D models included in dwg export model filter)&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;p style="padding-left:30px;"&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p style="padding-left:30px;"&gt;&lt;span style="background-color:#ccffcc;"&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Note:&lt;/strong&gt; MS_REF_VISEDGE_ATTACH_STATE&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;= CachedAutomatic&amp;nbsp;config variable doesn&amp;#39;t seem to be required anymore - correct me if im wrong?&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p style="padding-left:30px;"&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="background-color:#ffff00;"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Issues:&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;span style="text-decoration:line-through;"&gt;&lt;span style="background-color:#ffff00;"&gt;First cross section model exported has missing design elements - does this happen to anyone else?&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="background-color:#ffff00;"&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;span style="text-decoration:line-through;"&gt;&lt;span style="background-color:#ffff00;"&gt;Any Linear Annotation point name annotation is exported as &amp;quot;NONE&amp;quot;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="background-color:#ffff00;"&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="background-color:#ffff00;"&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;span style="background-color:#ffff00;"&gt;&lt;span style="text-decoration:line-through;"&gt;Point name annotation is exported as &amp;quot;NONE&amp;quot; for all points when you choose to export cross sections to external/new DGNs from the Create Drawings dialog&lt;/span&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;span style="background-color:#ffcc99;"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="background-color:#ffff00;"&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;span style="background-color:#ffff00;"&gt;Can take a long time to export for large models (specifically the &amp;quot;Merging Reference file to Model&amp;quot; process) &lt;span style="background-color:#00ff00;"&gt;Resolved in 2021 R2 (much faster model merge speed)&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="background-color:#ffff00;"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;span style="background-color:#ffcc99;"&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="text-decoration:underline;"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="text-decoration:underline;"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Profile DWG export:&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;*Required DWG Export options:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;em&gt;References &amp;gt; External Attachments: Merge or Merge to Cell &lt;strong&gt;(required to get sheet borders to export) &lt;span style="text-decoration:line-through;"&gt;- &lt;span style="color:#ff0000;text-decoration:line-through;"&gt;RESULTS IN&amp;nbsp;AN EXPORT ERROR IF 2D/3D models included in dwg export model filter&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;em&gt;References &amp;gt; Self-Attachments: Merge&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt; (&lt;strong&gt;to get profile and profile annotation to export&lt;/strong&gt;)&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;em&gt;References &amp;gt; Non-Default Models Attachments: Merge or Merge to Cell &lt;strong&gt;(required to get sh&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;eets to export with&amp;nbsp;profile drawing attachments&lt;/strong&gt;)&lt;/em&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="background-color:#ffff00;"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Issues:&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;span style="text-decoration:line-through;"&gt;&lt;span style="background-color:#ffff00;"&gt;3D Cut elements&amp;nbsp;are not exported - 3D Cut reference requires Merge to Master in Profile view to export (becomes static CAD lines)&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="background-color:#ffff00;"&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="background-color:#ffff00;"&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;span style="background-color:#ffff00;"&gt;Profile Geometry Annotation lose values in export, eg.&amp;nbsp;grade and K-value change to 0.00&lt;span style="background-color:#00ff00;"&gt; in Drawing Models only (okay for Sheet Models)&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="background-color:#ffff00;"&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;span style="text-decoration:line-through;"&gt;&lt;span style="background-color:#ffff00;"&gt;Lines are exported between Profile IPs on Layer 0&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="background-color:#ffff00;"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;span style="color:#ff0000;"&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="background-color:#ffff00;"&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="background-color:#ffff00;"&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Regards,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Mark&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="text-decoration:underline;"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Not able to add Matchlines as Corridor Reference</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/road___site_design/f/geopak-inroads-mx-openroads-forum/204617/not-able-to-add-matchlines-as-corridor-reference</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2020 13:08:47 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:cd27be88-1821-42a8-a3c5-190a923bdc9e</guid><dc:creator>Jeff Purl</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Has anyone had a case where they Matchlines won&amp;#39;t add to corridor reference to clip out for intersections? I can select them and reset to continue, but it doesn&amp;#39;t rebuild or add to the corridor. I&amp;#39;ve deleted the matchlines and made new ones, I deleted ALL the corridor references and added them again and these in particular won&amp;#39;t add. They&amp;#39;re in the same template drop where a matchline right next to it is working...&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I did have these intersections as civil cells and clipped the corridor (and since hand built the intersections and deleted the clipping) but not sure if this affects it in any way.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Also my corridor and intersections are in separate files, again not sure if it affects anything.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Any pointers would be greatly appreciated!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Element Profile by slope from element</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/road___site_design/f/geopak-inroads-mx-openroads-forum/218289/element-profile-by-slope-from-element</link><pubDate>Wed, 18 Aug 2021 08:40:22 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:73f2957e-c425-4355-8e58-b25b22ea90a6</guid><dc:creator>Euan Murray</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;ORD 2021R1 Update 1 (10.10.01.03)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I&amp;#39;m having an issue with element profiles, in this case projecting to the offside edge of a diverge nose (highlighted).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The mainline channel is profiled using 0% from the corridor element, its profile is on the left, and is as expected&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The nose profile is created at -2.5% from the mainline channel using Profile By Slope From Element, but gives steps and bumps as can be seen on the left profile.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;These irregularities are not present in the geometry, the superelevation, the profiles of the corridor elements, or the duplicate element of the mainline channel, so where are they coming from and how can I remove them?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="/resized-image/__size/320x240/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/5922/ORD-Profile.JPG" alt=" " /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Ask A Question I</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/achievements/460ac7df-7ccc-4c42-a204-9e05eef3be09</link><pubDate>Thu, 01 Jul 2021 06:48:26 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:a710e587-69ab-40a2-b97f-323c39728ebe</guid><dc:creator /><description>Ask a question in a forum.</description></item><item><title>ConstraintCommonNet.dll error</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/road___site_design/f/geopak-inroads-mx-openroads-forum/216082/constraintcommonnet-dll-error</link><pubDate>Thu, 01 Jul 2021 11:00:23 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:bf9842d6-0d35-4461-b653-6ac3588dd808</guid><dc:creator>Euan Murray</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;OpenRoads Designer Connect Edition 2020 Release 3 Update 9 v10.09.00.91 upgraded from 10.08.01.033.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;Error appears when selecting a terrain, no properties display.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;File is present in&amp;nbsp;C:\Program Files\Bentley\OpenRoads Designer CONNECT Edition\OpenRoadsDesigner\Assemblies&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;In order to carry out work I have to fully uninstall and go back to the previous version&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;&lt;img alt=" " src="/resized-image/__size/400x400/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/5922/ConstraintCommonNetDLL.JPG" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;&lt;img alt=" " src="/resized-image/__size/500x500/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/5922/PropertiesError.JPG" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>View Control and other things missing</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/road___site_design/f/geopak-inroads-mx-openroads-forum/209561/view-control-and-other-things-missing</link><pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2021 20:56:58 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:4361ec95-f9dc-453c-a2a7-41b000f94481</guid><dc:creator>Ken Bagnall</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I&amp;#39;ve opened ORD (v10.09.00.91)&amp;nbsp;today to find View Control now missing under right click and F9 now mapped to Key-Ins browser (previously plan/3D view).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;No idea what&amp;#39;s caused this but how can I reset/correct this back to what it was originally?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I&amp;#39;ve seen a post about this through customisation but this was a default setting so shouldn&amp;#39;t need any new customisation?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thanks,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Ken&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>