<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://communities.bentley.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><channel><title>Craig's Activities</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/members/4ca38c60_2d00_7108_2d00_4cd8_2d00_8c30_2d00_9c30678b27ba</link><description>Craig's recent activity</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 12</generator><item><title>zone demand pattern versus customer demand pattern</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/hydraulics___hydrology/f/haestad-hydraulics-and-hydrology-forum/234253/zone-demand-pattern-versus-customer-demand-pattern</link><pubDate>Thu, 18 Aug 2022 18:57:15 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:b16d5363-9d2c-48ed-a5c9-e1ec6b361781</guid><dc:creator>Craig</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;A colleague is recommending using a demand pattern by zone instead of customer type.&amp;nbsp; I can see where this might work well for smaller zones that are mostly 1 type of customer, but in very large zones with a mix of residential, commercial and industrial customers I feel its a bad idea.&amp;nbsp; His thought is that as long as you calibrate it based on field data, 1 usage pattern is fine.&amp;nbsp; What about when planning for future growth?&amp;nbsp; Say there is an area that will be heavily residential in the future and you apply this zone pattern to it, then how reliable will it be?&amp;nbsp; I have my doubts on this approach.&amp;nbsp; Is there any experience doing it one way versus the other and the pros/cons?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Ask A Question I</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/achievements/460ac7df-7ccc-4c42-a204-9e05eef3be09</link><pubDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2018 00:17:26 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:b66a0e1f-4005-46ac-b86e-d599d01e0608</guid><dc:creator /><description>Ask a question in a forum.</description></item><item><title>Element Symbology coloring issue</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/hydraulics___hydrology/f/haestad-hydraulics-and-hydrology-forum/145982/element-symbology-coloring-issue</link><pubDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2018 18:54:28 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:4dbbf247-511c-4945-9783-2b67b7f0f634</guid><dc:creator>Craig</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I cannot get element symbology to work.&amp;nbsp; Pipes, nodes, etc are white and will not color code.&amp;nbsp; Displays properly in Aerial View, but not main window.&amp;nbsp; FYI, recently upgraded from 08.11.04.58 to 10.01.00.72&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img alt=" " src="/resized-image/__size/320x240/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/5925/pastedimage1516647259597v1.png" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>