<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://communities.bentley.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><channel><title>Louis Flores's Communities Activities</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/members/4e38d5ab_2d00_ade8_2d00_4b0f_2d00_8ce8_2d00_b83d481e7a0a</link><description>Recent activity for people in Louis Flores's community</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 12</generator><item><title>STAAD Foundation Advanced - Specified Area for Loss of Contact</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/ram-staad/f/ram-staad-forum/230520/staad-foundation-advanced---specified-area-for-loss-of-contact</link><pubDate>Mon, 30 May 2022 05:58:26 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:d0804663-bfe8-4a08-922a-d77b831e5a9d</guid><dc:creator>Louis Flores</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the attached SFA file and image, I specified that there should be 100% contact for service load combinations (see footing no. 1). However, when I check the area in uplift for these load combinations, the footing still experiences loss of contact. Can somebody please explain why is this the case?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img alt=" " src="/resized-image/__size/320x240/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/5932/Loss-of-contact.png" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://communities.bentley.com/cfs-file/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/5932/0434._5B00_CE-196_5D00_-_2D00_-Isolated.sfa"&gt;communities.bentley.com/.../0434._5B00_CE-196_5D00_-_2D00_-Isolated.sfa&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>STAAD Foundation Advanced Interpretation of Error Message</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/ram-staad/f/ram-staad-forum/230646/staad-foundation-advanced-interpretation-of-error-message</link><pubDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2022 09:37:39 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:2572e42c-fa11-447b-a2e3-d1dd62fd68da</guid><dc:creator>Louis Flores</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I received an error like the one in the image below from SFA. Can somebody explain it to me? Why is it that the software is unable to redistribute the pressures? Is it because that all the corners have negative pressures?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="/resized-image/__size/320x240/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/5932/pastedimage1654076208604v1.png" alt=" " /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>STAAD Foundation Negative Pressures</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/ram-staad/f/ram-staad-forum/230403/staad-foundation-negative-pressures</link><pubDate>Thu, 26 May 2022 07:17:44 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:59f3e00c-4099-4404-81ae-ea7aefed75fd</guid><dc:creator>Louis Flores</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the design of footings against shear and moments, we determine the volume of pressure underneath the critical section. How does SFA compute this when there is a negative pressure? Does it redistribute the pressure so all corners have positive pressures or does it simply ignore the negative pressures?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="display:none;" id="highlighter--hover-tools"&gt;
&lt;div id="highlighter--hover-tools--container"&gt;
&lt;div class="highlighter--icon highlighter--icon-copy" title="Copy"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="highlighter--icon highlighter--icon-change-color" title="Change Color"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="highlighter--icon highlighter--icon-delete" title="Delete"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>STAAD Foundation Eccentricity Beyond Kern</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/ram-staad/f/ram-staad-forum/230422/staad-foundation-eccentricity-beyond-kern</link><pubDate>Thu, 26 May 2022 10:47:04 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:38f79227-e8be-45b8-83d8-2cb69216470d</guid><dc:creator>Louis Flores</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I have set my isolated footing design to remain in full contact with the soil. However, when I check the eccentricity of the factored loads, it is beyond the kern which is 1/6 of the footing dimension.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;1) Why does SFA give out such design when this kind of footing design is unacceptable?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;2) Given that the eccentricity is beyond the kern, does this mean that my footing is experiencing loss of contact?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://communities.bentley.com/cfs-file/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/5932/8030.Isolated-Footing-_2D00_-Axial.sfa"&gt;communities.bentley.com/.../8030.Isolated-Footing-_2D00_-Axial.sfa&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img alt=" " src="/resized-image/__size/320x240/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/5932/Kern.png" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="display:none;" id="highlighter--hover-tools"&gt;
&lt;div id="highlighter--hover-tools--container"&gt;
&lt;div class="highlighter--icon highlighter--icon-copy" title="Copy"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="highlighter--icon highlighter--icon-change-color" title="Change Color"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="highlighter--icon highlighter--icon-delete" title="Delete"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>STAAD Foundation One-Way Shear Discrepancy</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/ram-staad/f/ram-staad-forum/230502/staad-foundation-one-way-shear-discrepancy</link><pubDate>Sun, 29 May 2022 02:41:21 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:55c5086c-4884-4e33-bb5e-b3173bf4e85f</guid><dc:creator>Louis Flores</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the SFA file below, please look at &amp;quot;Interior&amp;quot; job. When I verified the one-way shear capacity, I computed it to be Vc=348.29kN but the software calculated it to be Vc=335.04kN. My calculations are found below:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Vc = 0.17 * (1) * (2000mm) * (209.1mm) * sqrt(24MPa) * (1/1000) = 348.29kN&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Please help me determine why there&amp;#39;s a discrepancy.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://communities.bentley.com/cfs-file/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/5932/_5B00_CE-196_5D00_-_2D00_-Isolated-Finalized.sfa"&gt;communities.bentley.com/.../_5B00_CE-196_5D00_-_2D00_-Isolated-Finalized.sfa&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Design of Foundation Dowels</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/ram-staad/f/ram-staad-forum/230496/design-of-foundation-dowels</link><pubDate>Sat, 28 May 2022 16:07:18 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:1dd178a9-33f3-45c7-9b3e-c615f93bc735</guid><dc:creator>Louis Flores</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Is there anyone who is experienced in designing footing dowels? I just have a question: if the bearing strength of the column and footing concrete exceeds the maximum compressive compressive force, do we still need to provide sufficient development length for the dowels?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="display:none;" id="highlighter--hover-tools"&gt;
&lt;div id="highlighter--hover-tools--container"&gt;
&lt;div class="highlighter--icon highlighter--icon-copy" title="Copy"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="highlighter--icon highlighter--icon-change-color" title="Change Color"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="highlighter--icon highlighter--icon-delete" title="Delete"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>STAAD Foundation Shear Computation</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/ram-staad/f/ram-staad-forum/230358/staad-foundation-shear-computation</link><pubDate>Wed, 25 May 2022 13:28:01 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:42467a15-ff64-4971-aca2-bc5a5c7e3a12</guid><dc:creator>Louis Flores</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;How does SFA compute for the one-way shear? I tried to manually compute it but I obtained 5.1kN while the software computed 4.8kN.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://communities.bentley.com/cfs-file/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/5932/8015.Isolated-Footing-_2D00_-Axial.sfa"&gt;communities.bentley.com/.../8015.Isolated-Footing-_2D00_-Axial.sfa&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img alt=" " src="/resized-image/__size/320x240/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/5932/8715.Solution.jpg" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>STAAD Foundation Uplift Pressure</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/ram-staad/f/ram-staad-forum/230392/staad-foundation-uplift-pressure</link><pubDate>Thu, 26 May 2022 04:25:21 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:5a11151f-b1c1-466b-8662-8561210cd90e</guid><dc:creator>Louis Flores</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In my SFA, please refer to &amp;quot;Preliminary Design - Isolated&amp;quot; job. I have set that the minimum contact area for both service and ultimate load cases should be 100%. However, for Isolated Footing 1, I noticed that there is still negative pressures underneath the footing (see photo). Why is it that there are negative pressures but the table (see photo) shows that there is no loss of contact?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://communities.bentley.com/cfs-file/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/5932/1641._5B00_CE-196_5D00_-_2D00_-Isolated.sfa"&gt;communities.bentley.com/.../1641._5B00_CE-196_5D00_-_2D00_-Isolated.sfa&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="/resized-image/__size/320x240/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/5932/pastedimage1653539016813v1.png" alt=" " /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>STAAD Foundation Stability Check</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/ram-staad/f/ram-staad-forum/230396/staad-foundation-stability-check</link><pubDate>Thu, 26 May 2022 05:59:18 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:d463eb4d-48a8-4666-99a8-d54f9297df83</guid><dc:creator>Louis Flores</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Why is it that the stability check of footings in SFA is only performed for service load combinations?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>STAAD Foundation -  Steel Density</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/ram-staad/f/ram-staad-forum/230220/staad-foundation---steel-density</link><pubDate>Mon, 23 May 2022 07:36:02 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:71b616e7-d247-468d-b882-1122d71fb6a0</guid><dc:creator>Louis Flores</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;How does SFA determine the mass of reinforcement steel? Where can I find the steel density value/s that SFA uses?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="/resized-image/__size/320x240/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/5932/pastedimage1653291376639v1.png" alt=" " /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>STAAD Foundation Effective Depth Calculations</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/ram-staad/f/ram-staad-forum/230339/staad-foundation-effective-depth-calculations</link><pubDate>Wed, 25 May 2022 05:48:28 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:6ac44e28-2cb8-4cca-8370-917834adc240</guid><dc:creator>Louis Flores</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I am designing an isolated footing in SFA. I just want to clarify some things with regard to the calculations used by the software:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;1) In the shear calculation, the calculated effective depth does not match hand calculation. Hand calculation shows 0.165m but SFA solved it to be 0.1655m (Example from Isolated Footing 1). Through back calculation, I found that SFA uses 9.5mm for the reinforcement steel diameter instead of 10mm. Why is it that STAAD uses 9.5mm diameter when I have selected a 10mm steel diameter size from the design menu? Why wasn&amp;#39;t this updated by the software developers?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://communities.bentley.com/cfs-file/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/5932/Inquiry-on-Calculation.sfa"&gt;communities.bentley.com/.../Inquiry-on-Calculation.sfa&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="display:none;" id="highlighter--hover-tools"&gt;
&lt;div id="highlighter--hover-tools--container"&gt;
&lt;div class="highlighter--icon highlighter--icon-copy" title="Copy"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="highlighter--icon highlighter--icon-change-color" title="Change Color"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="highlighter--icon highlighter--icon-delete" title="Delete"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style="display:none;" id="highlighter--hover-tools"&gt;
&lt;div id="highlighter--hover-tools--container"&gt;
&lt;div class="highlighter--icon highlighter--icon-copy" title="Copy"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="highlighter--icon highlighter--icon-change-color" title="Change Color"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="highlighter--icon highlighter--icon-delete" title="Delete"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style="display:none;" id="highlighter--hover-tools"&gt;
&lt;div id="highlighter--hover-tools--container"&gt;
&lt;div class="highlighter--icon highlighter--icon-copy" title="Copy"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="highlighter--icon highlighter--icon-change-color" title="Change Color"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="highlighter--icon highlighter--icon-delete" title="Delete"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>STAAD Foundation Incorrect Spacing</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/ram-staad/f/ram-staad-forum/230240/staad-foundation-incorrect-spacing</link><pubDate>Mon, 23 May 2022 12:47:05 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:058328af-de58-49d7-b1c7-3c7dc480e955</guid><dc:creator>Louis Flores</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I am designing isolated footings. However, the flexure rebars&amp;#39; spacing are not consistent with the calculation sheet and the drawing. How do I resolve this? What spacing value should I follow?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://communities.bentley.com/cfs-file/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/5932/_5B00_CE-196_5D00_-_2D00_-Isolated.sfa"&gt;communities.bentley.com/.../_5B00_CE-196_5D00_-_2D00_-Isolated.sfa&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>STAAD Foundation - Transfer Graph in Excel</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/ram-staad/f/ram-staad-forum/230199/staad-foundation---transfer-graph-in-excel</link><pubDate>Sun, 22 May 2022 13:50:30 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:4bc45e2f-fd4d-41ca-ae07-2b414292ac5b</guid><dc:creator>Louis Flores</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Is there a way to transfer the shear and moment diagrams to Excel?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="/resized-image/__size/320x240/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/5932/pastedimage1653227429608v1.png" alt=" " /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>SFA User Defined Load Combinations</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/ram-staad/f/ram-staad-forum/230175/sfa-user-defined-load-combinations</link><pubDate>Sat, 21 May 2022 05:06:25 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:53114d44-7f40-4faa-af6b-ab5c20c955fc</guid><dc:creator>Louis Flores</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I want to define my own set of load combinations. How do I add more load combinations?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="/resized-image/__size/320x240/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/5932/pastedimage1653109593137v1.png" alt=" " /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Cracking Condition of Footings</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/ram-staad/f/ram-staad-forum/230169/cracking-condition-of-footings</link><pubDate>Fri, 20 May 2022 18:09:31 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:b9f90dae-1954-4e26-a2ba-64141ff85489</guid><dc:creator>Louis Flores</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In SFA, the software checks the maximum spacing for a cracking condition. Do we always have to follow this maximum spacing for cracking condition? If not, what are the justifications for not following this ACI provision?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img alt=" " src="/resized-image/__size/320x240/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/5932/pastedimage1653070154775v1.png" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>