<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://communities.bentley.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><channel><title>Reginald Askew's Communities Activities</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/members/51fc96a0_2d00_be56_2d00_444e_2d00_b11f_2d00_e53fab5e77c6</link><description>Recent activity for people in Reginald Askew's community</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 12</generator><item><title>RAM SBeam v3.0</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/ram-staad/f/ram-staad-forum/128967/ram-sbeam-v3-0</link><pubDate>Mon, 28 Nov 2016 16:55:54 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:ce2654bf-6776-45b1-8335-aaa2ea77b788</guid><dc:creator>Reginald Askew</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hello -&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;My office still uses version 3.0 of RAM SBeam. When analyzing composite beams, I notice in the output that phi factor of 0.85 and 0.9 are used for flexure and shear, respectively. RAM SBeam v3.0 uses the 3rd Edition of AISC LRFD; however, I do not see these factors (I see/am used to phi factors of 0.9 and 0.75 for flexure and shear, respectively).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Can anyone provide some insight? Thanks in advance!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>