<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://communities.bentley.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><channel><title>MOHAMMAD JAVED IQBAL's Communities Activities</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/members/54481057_2d00_6509_2d00_4f32_2d00_9a39_2d00_ed8f20f3ddd7</link><description>Recent activity for people in MOHAMMAD JAVED IQBAL's community</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 12</generator><item><title>Ask A Question I</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/achievements/460ac7df-7ccc-4c42-a204-9e05eef3be09</link><pubDate>Fri, 05 Apr 2019 02:09:30 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:efb9026d-9add-4308-a808-815c01afabb4</guid><dc:creator /><description>Ask a question in a forum.</description></item><item><title>Kindly go through the list of question  regarding modeling and assumption taken?</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/ram-staad/f/ram-staad-forum/177738/kindly-go-through-the-list-of-question-regarding-modeling-and-assumption-taken</link><pubDate>Fri, 05 Apr 2019 02:33:42 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:657c222d-9f13-4a7c-ab58-910aac374900</guid><dc:creator>MOHAMMAD JAVED IQBAL</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Model Description:Hopper Supported over Steel frame Structure&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Questions&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;1.Directly Applied the hopper capacity load on the top upper member is this assumption right??(Hopper capacity/1 bay area) this is distributed over beam as member load via manual distribution.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;2.What if, we directly applying the floor load as&amp;nbsp;&lt;span&gt;(Hopper capacity/1 bay area) i think distribution on beam will same ,Kindly comment on it?&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;3. When bracing here as pipe connected to beam,in staad in order make bracing we have provide node thereby dividing the beam into two part,for ex beam 75 and 717,&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;though defined LZ= full size of size beam in staad even for column defined LZ = Total height of structure ;is it right to do this way?&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;5. Should we Define bracing member as truss or we provide release in them.?i guess warning in staad are due to truss only&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;6.some of the member are not&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;designed,how to design&amp;nbsp; them.??how to surpass the slenderness&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Kindly provide the insight on taken assumption and comment on the result obtained suggest if something can be added further?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://communities.bentley.com/cfs-file/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/5932/i_5F00_TAPERED-SECTIONS.std"&gt;communities.bentley.com/.../i_5F00_TAPERED-SECTIONS.std&lt;/a&gt;&lt;img alt=" " src="/resized-image/__size/320x240/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/5932/pastedimage1556561070380v2.png" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>