<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://communities.bentley.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><channel><title>John Lynch's Activities</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/members/548a3058_2d00_b247_2d00_471d_2d00_ba68_2d00_0a86e45a8b62</link><description>John Lynch's recent activity</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 12</generator><item><title>Conspan &amp;quot;Design Truck&amp;quot; vs &amp;quot;Double Truck&amp;quot;</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/bridge_design___engineering/f/bridgemaster-lars-leap-openbridge-rm-forum/113177/conspan-design-truck-vs-double-truck</link><pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2015 17:37:54 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:d95a899e-4a72-4120-8b86-534e61857130</guid><dc:creator>John Lynch</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I am having difficulty matching Conspan&amp;#39;s &amp;quot;Double Truck&amp;quot; load. &amp;nbsp;The user manual (and AASHTO) states that the negative design LL should be 90% of lane + 90% of two HL93s with non varying rear axles spaced no further than 50ft. &amp;nbsp;I agree with this however when I produce my moment diagrams by hand, I do not match Conspan&amp;#39;s Double Truck. &amp;nbsp;When I open the live load library to investigate, I see the following note attached to the Double Truck: &amp;nbsp;&amp;quot;NOTE: Internally CONSPAN automatically considers 80% of the truck load selected for analysis, applied simultaneously with this lane load&amp;quot;. &amp;nbsp;This does not match the AASHTO 3.6.1.3.1. &amp;nbsp;Can you expand upon this live load case and where AASHTO talks about it?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In addition, I believe the &amp;quot;Design Truck&amp;quot; case is automatically recognizing a continuous span bridge and running the two HL93s spaced at 50ft+. &amp;nbsp;The live load library gives no indication of this but my negative moment diagrams match it. &amp;nbsp;Can you confirm my suspicions?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I should also note that I am running version V13.00.00.68. &amp;nbsp;My company has had crashing issues on new computers with v14 and we are holding out to v15 in hopes that the problem goes away.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thank you for the help in this negative moment issue.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Conspan Continuous span calculations of negative moment</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/bridge_design___engineering/f/bridgemaster-lars-leap-openbridge-rm-forum/110291/conspan-continuous-span-calculations-of-negative-moment</link><pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2015 22:00:20 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:ea720b07-69b2-4579-a46a-edae447fe5eb</guid><dc:creator>John Lynch</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I have modeled a two span continuous span bridge with bulb tee girders. &amp;nbsp;However in design of the negative moment continuity steel, I noticed that at the pier Conspan has different negative moments coming from span 1 to span 2. &amp;nbsp;I should also mention that this is occurring on only half the girder lines on the bridge. &amp;nbsp;The other half of the bridge shows moment in equals moment out of the pier. &amp;nbsp;How is this possible? &amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When I reproduce the moment curves for this bridge, it appears that Conspan jumped to taking the negative moment at the girder bearing instead of the center of the pier. &amp;nbsp;This greatly underestimates the forces that this steel will experience. &amp;nbsp;Again, this is only occurring on one span in half the girder lines.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thank you&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Conspan Vertical Shear: Beta and Theta calculation</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/bridge_design___engineering/f/bridgemaster-lars-leap-openbridge-rm-forum/108364/conspan-vertical-shear-beta-and-theta-calculation</link><pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2015 20:13:22 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:a87297f2-3067-4c67-a069-697ebb894175</guid><dc:creator>John Lynch</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I am trying to match Conspan&amp;#39;s vertical shear output with some difficulty.&amp;nbsp; I am following the AASHTO equations from section 5.8.3.4.2 with a negative longitudinal tensile strain.&amp;nbsp; Since Conspan gives an output on just about every variable except for &amp;quot;Act&amp;quot;, does anyone know how this value is calculated.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Also Conspan labels the strain as &amp;quot;esp_x&amp;quot;, regardless of the method used.&amp;nbsp; However it is clearly &amp;quot;esp_s&amp;quot; for this situation.&amp;nbsp; I believe this is only a labeling error.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thank you for any help given.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>