Meera Vasudevan's Activitieshttps://communities.bentley.com/members/5aef2ded_2d00_6368_2d00_4297_2d00_aaeb_2d00_0f987e1a9efaMeera Vasudevan's recent activityen-USTelligent Community 12SVFlux Pwp outputhttps://communities.bentley.com/products/geotech-analysis/f/forum/207138/svflux-pwp-outputWed, 09 Dec 2020 19:02:17 GMT6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:5252c6c3-4506-4223-948c-9896aa3f717fMeera Vasudevan<div><img alt=" " src="/resized-image/__size/320x240/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/343671/SVFLUX-_5F00_output.jpg" /><img alt=" " src="/resized-image/__size/320x240/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/343671/SVSLOPE_5F00_1.jpg" /><img alt=" " src="/resized-image/__size/320x240/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/343671/SVSLOPE_5F00_2.jpg" /></div> <div></div> <div></div> <div></div> <div>I am encountering the following issue while doing coupled SVFlux-SVSlope analysis: I am using V 5.4.08</div> <div>The position of the phreatic surface is somehow being taken outside the slope&nbsp; boundary for transient analysis.</div> <div>Thus the corresponding stability analysis is giving unrealistic results with an increased factor of safety corresponding to increasing&nbsp;Phreatic level with time for transient analysis.</div> <div>&nbsp;Kindly suggest the possible reason for this &amp; how to rectify it.</div> <div></div> <div></div><div style="clear:both;"></div>Ask A Question Ihttps://communities.bentley.com/achievements/460ac7df-7ccc-4c42-a204-9e05eef3be09Wed, 09 Dec 2020 04:16:22 GMT6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:d3b3ca60-c2e9-434a-8e8f-7f351467b308Ask a question in a forum.