<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://communities.bentley.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><channel><title>Janakiraman's Activities</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/members/5d8fa5c4_2d00_cf89_2d00_403c_2d00_ac27_2d00_19c69b047c18</link><description>Janakiraman's recent activity</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 12</generator><item><title>An inclined member (Stair stringer-MC 12x10.6) passing with AISC 360-10ASD, but failing in AISC 360-16 ASD showing Cl.D1</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/ram-staad/f/ram-staad-forum/206373/an-inclined-member-stair-stringer-mc-12x10-6-passing-with-aisc-360-10asd-but-failing-in-aisc-360-16-asd-showing-cl-d1</link><pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2020 16:53:53 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:5242d3ed-721b-45c3-871a-5d53be76b0cd</guid><dc:creator>Janakiraman</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I am designing a Stair stringer with MC 12x10.6, keeping all parameters same, results showing as failed in AISC 360-16 ASD but passing in AISC 360-10 ASD. The failure clause D1 is same in both versions.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="/resized-image/__size/320x240/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/5932/pastedimage1606150217009v1.png" alt=" " /&gt;&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;img src="/resized-image/__size/320x240/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/5932/pastedimage1606150307205v3.png" alt=" " /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Ask A Question I</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/achievements/460ac7df-7ccc-4c42-a204-9e05eef3be09</link><pubDate>Mon, 25 Mar 2019 05:58:55 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:fb9848a0-55c8-4a48-b27d-3e3c49e12f47</guid><dc:creator /><description>Ask a question in a forum.</description></item><item><title>Bolt Group Eccentricity calculation for Single plate per AISC 360-10 ASD</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/ram-staad/f/ram-staad-forum/177145/bolt-group-eccentricity-calculation-for-single-plate-per-aisc-360-10-asd</link><pubDate>Mon, 25 Mar 2019 16:12:56 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:060ad186-11ee-4c69-8703-e1329ff63712</guid><dc:creator>Janakiraman</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hello All,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;We are facing problem in RAM connections while using single plate, that is not considering full bolt group eccentricity.For example,if we give the input for weld to bolt line distance as 2&amp;quot; (e)but in RAM calculation its about 1&amp;quot; only. Please refer attached snaps advise. PS: RAM connection taking the exact eccentricity for LSL holes.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="/resized-image/__size/320x240/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/5932/pastedimage1553530032433v1.png" alt=" " /&gt;&lt;img src="/resized-image/__size/320x240/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/5932/pastedimage1553530289291v2.png" alt=" " /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>