https://communities.bentley.com/members/61423b82_2d00_b137_2d00_4d23_2d00_95b9_2d00_a71729c5e4ffRecent activity for people in 树锋 赵's communityen-USTelligent Community 12https://communities.bentley.com/products/geotech-analysis/f/forum/212727/plaxis-2d-interface-setting-excess-pore-pressure-inputSun, 18 Apr 2021 14:39:53 GMT6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:a69a3edf-44b4-4be0-9cbc-421330070794树锋 赵<p><span>Greetings to the forum members.&nbsp; I have two questions to ask.</span></p> <p><span>&nbsp; 1. I was trying to simulate the undrained loading and consolidation process of a circular skirted foundation and compare the results with previous research.&nbsp;</span>Interaction between the foundation and soil was represented by either a fully rough or frictionless interface.&nbsp;&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp; &nbsp; In the case of a fully rough interface, the results are in full agreement with the paper. However, in the case of frictionless interface,&nbsp;The&nbsp;excess pore pressure&nbsp;and consolidation settlement deviate by 20% from the result in the paper.&nbsp;I think that the interface is not completely smooth.&nbsp; (I set the Rinter=0.01 ).&nbsp; Can the interface be set as fully smooth as in Abaqus?&nbsp; Please teach me how to set it.</p> <p></p> <p>2. Can the excess pore pressure be&nbsp;input as the initial value before consolidation analyse?</p> <p></p> <p><span style="font-size:200%;">&nbsp;Thank you very much for your time.</span></p><div style="clear:both;"></div>https://communities.bentley.com/achievements/460ac7df-7ccc-4c42-a204-9e05eef3be09Sun, 18 Apr 2021 06:39:08 GMT6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:56ee0f0b-d1a5-4f46-a9f9-07f79d3a8e62Ask a question in a forum.