<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://communities.bentley.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><channel><title>Kenny Shi's Activities</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/members/61451678_2d00_231c_2d00_4612_2d00_bf6f_2d00_254890a8b40e</link><description>Kenny Shi's recent activity</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 12</generator><item><title>the point lost control after add the Secondary Alignment in version of 10.11.00.115 ORD</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/road___site_design/f/geopak-inroads-mx-openroads-forum/248207/the-point-lost-control-after-add-the-secondary-alignment-in-version-of-10-11-00-115-ord</link><pubDate>Thu, 27 Jul 2023 12:48:05 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:42b211f9-5066-47cc-93e8-60e7231b6bb0</guid><dc:creator>Kenny Shi</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Good day! Bentle Support Team,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I got an problem while I am running the Highway Gore Area design with the new version ORD (10.11.00.115).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;At the ramp gore area, we must force the ramp outer edge perpendicular with the inner edge. Thus, we use the function of Secondary Alignment to achieve it.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But in the new version, it is no issue if the template is simple. For instance, we created the top surface at beginning to&amp;nbsp;run the supperelevation and point control. it looks fine. (see the snip 1)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img style="max-height:240px;max-width:320px;" src="/resized-image/__size/640x480/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/5922/0160.pastedimage1690461572865v1.png" alt=" " /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;After we developed the template to add more constraint and rules for the base and grading design, the issue comes up. the ramp outer edge lost association with the point control (supperelevation and Hor..). There is small discrepancy between the control what we expected. (see the snip 2)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;img style="max-height:240px;max-width:320px;" src="/resized-image/__size/640x480/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/5922/1805.pastedimage1690461832179v2.png" alt=" " /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If we turn off the function of the Secondary Alignment, the point control will bet back, the points will be associated with the point control properly. (see the snip 3)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img style="max-height:240px;max-width:320px;" src="/resized-image/__size/640x480/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/5922/8357.pastedimage1690461940407v3.png" alt=" " /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;the function of the Secondary Alignment has been used for the ramp gore area control normally. we don&amp;#39;t have issue before.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I would appreciate it if you could take a look at my case any help us fix this problem. Thanks!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Best Regards,&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Kenny&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>In ORD, how to Annotate the Edge of Pavement Elevation in plan and force the annotation to follow the corridor base alignment station</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/road___site_design/f/geopak-inroads-mx-openroads-forum/198277/in-ord-how-to-annotate-the-edge-of-pavement-elevation-in-plan-and-force-the-annotation-to-follow-the-corridor-base-alignment-station</link><pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2020 18:18:02 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:037c5a46-bab2-4a96-a353-ffb381a5d640</guid><dc:creator>Kenny Shi</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I would be grateful for any advice on how to annotate the edge of pavement elevation in the plan and force the annotation to follow the corridor alignment station.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Please see the snapshot below. we can annotate the EOP elevation by &amp;quot;Feature Annotation&amp;quot; in SS4, also choose the corridor alignment to locate the annotation. But in ORD, we can create one &amp;quot;favorite text&amp;quot; and add this &amp;quot;favorite text&amp;quot; into the &amp;quot;annotation group&amp;quot; to annotate the feature line elevation (Z), but it always follows their own station (not the corridor alignment). I am just wondering is there any chance to annotate corridor feature lines elevation but following the corridor alignment station.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Best Regards,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Kenny&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img height="248" src="/resized-image/__size/320x240/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/5922/pastedimage1591207663997v1.png" width="529" alt=" " /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>the points don&amp;#39;t show the annotation in ORD cross-section</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/road___site_design/f/geopak-inroads-mx-openroads-forum/226786/the-points-don-t-show-the-annotation-in-ord-cross-section</link><pubDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2022 00:37:04 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:078f8353-02a2-4d7d-899e-ddf4d6f2bef6</guid><dc:creator>Kenny Shi</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;We have cross-section annotation issue recently.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;- Our ORD version is 2021 Release 1 Update 10&lt;br /&gt;- We normally create one container file to attach the whole corridor model.&lt;br /&gt;- We use the annotation group to define the cross-section points.&lt;br /&gt;- We choose the points from the template in Annotation Manage - location dialogue box.&lt;br /&gt;- it shows correctly in the section display but doesn&amp;#39;t show properly in the cross-section.&lt;br /&gt;- if we work on the corridor file, it is work. But don&amp;#39;t annotate the other reference files.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I would more appreciate it if you can help me to solve this issue.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Regards,&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Kenny&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>the attached files (eg. existing ground, 3D models, etc.) disappeared of a sudden.</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/road___site_design/f/geopak-inroads-mx-openroads-forum/207846/the-attached-files-eg-existing-ground-3d-models-etc-disappeared-of-a-sudden</link><pubDate>Mon, 28 Dec 2020 17:38:35 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:36dc59ba-22fb-4074-bb70-68ca7717920e</guid><dc:creator>Kenny Shi</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Dear Benley ORD advisor,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Something happened weird! Everything is working well two minutes ago, Just of a sudden, the sections disappeared in section view and the whole attached files show the X,Y,Z with strange text. (please see the snapshot below). I typed the commend of Geometry Dynamicsection Deletesveiw to get the sections back. But the attached files still don&amp;#39;t show up.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I would more appreciate it if someone can help us solve this issue.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img height="235" src="/resized-image/__size/320x240/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/5922/pastedimage1609176468801v1.png" width="530" alt=" " /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Best Regards,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Kenny&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Ask A Question I</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/achievements/460ac7df-7ccc-4c42-a204-9e05eef3be09</link><pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2020 01:36:25 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:892e9b3a-0400-40c0-91ab-8a97e8bf89a3</guid><dc:creator /><description>Ask a question in a forum.</description></item><item><title>ORD U6 - Annotate Template Corridor Feature Definition Geometry</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/road___site_design/f/geopak-inroads-mx-openroads-forum/173374/ord-u6---annotate-template-corridor-feature-definition-geometry</link><pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2019 12:59:45 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:a3a0f6ec-232e-48a8-97ce-1138314c2368</guid><dc:creator>Josh WHEALY</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I am yet to look into this fully but is it possible to annotate 3D geometry created by a template drop?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I have assigned a feature definition to my road channel template point but currently, based on my understanding, element annotation is limited to civil geometry.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;My EOP&amp;nbsp;is defined with civil geometry in 2D space, the Z coordinate is unknown until an EOP point control is set on the template corridor. Once I set my point controls I can see the feature definition line in 3D space but how can I get those Z levels to assign themselves to the 2D EOP civil geometry? I guess it would be like using point controls to create profile lines???&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If what I&amp;#39;m asking isn&amp;#39;t clear I&amp;#39;ll try again to explain.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Josh&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>