<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://communities.bentley.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><channel><title>triezenbergj's Communities Activities</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/members/684b1ecd_2d00_eac6_2d00_4fae_2d00_8e56_2d00_a0a7349e2ca5</link><description>Recent activity for people in triezenbergj's community</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 12</generator><item><title>P-Delta Analysis</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/ram-staad/f/ram-staad-forum/111905/p-delta-analysis</link><pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2015 16:45:16 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:37cc547c-a1c7-420b-b4fe-7108eb4cef82</guid><dc:creator>triezenbergj</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Technical Reference Manual 3.37.2.(option 1).c says the PDELTA analysis results are as good or better than the PDELTA KG analysis results. &amp;nbsp;Can anybody elaborate on this? &amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I would think that the Kg analysis would always return more reliable results. &amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Also, under (option 2) e, the help says for static analysis PDELTA ANALYSIS (SMALL) with 20 or more iterations is preferred. &amp;nbsp;Why is KG not preferred?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thanks,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Jeff&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>