<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://communities.bentley.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><channel><title>triezenbergj's Activities</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/members/684b1ecd_2d00_eac6_2d00_4fae_2d00_8e56_2d00_a0a7349e2ca5</link><description>triezenbergj's recent activity</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 12</generator><item><title>P-Delta Analysis</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/ram-staad/f/ram-staad-forum/111905/p-delta-analysis</link><pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2015 16:45:16 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:37cc547c-a1c7-420b-b4fe-7108eb4cef82</guid><dc:creator>triezenbergj</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Technical Reference Manual 3.37.2.(option 1).c says the PDELTA analysis results are as good or better than the PDELTA KG analysis results. &amp;nbsp;Can anybody elaborate on this? &amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I would think that the Kg analysis would always return more reliable results. &amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Also, under (option 2) e, the help says for static analysis PDELTA ANALYSIS (SMALL) with 20 or more iterations is preferred. &amp;nbsp;Why is KG not preferred?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thanks,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Jeff&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>SS3 - How do I generate an XML Report that shows the station of the baseline, but the elevations at a given offset from the baseline?</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/road___site_design/f/geopak-inroads-mx-openroads-forum/108431/ss3---how-do-i-generate-an-xml-report-that-shows-the-station-of-the-baseline-but-the-elevations-at-a-given-offset-from-the-baseline</link><pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2015 12:33:36 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:510146c1-ef58-4fad-8d1c-f2db56fa83db</guid><dc:creator>triezenbergj</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I found &lt;a href="/products/road___site_design/w/road_and_site_design__wiki/16740.generate-station-base-report-with-elevations-at-given-offset" target="_blank"&gt;this post&lt;/a&gt; describing a workflow for InRoads, but it isn&amp;#39;t the same in PowerGEOPAK. &amp;nbsp;I want to generate elevations of a terrain along an alignment at a specified station and offset. &amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Temporary supports in RC-Pier</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/bridge_design___engineering/f/bridgemaster-lars-leap-openbridge-rm-forum/106875/temporary-supports-in-rc-pier</link><pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2015 13:52:55 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:015b340d-a4aa-4ec8-a7ce-c820bf75269c</guid><dc:creator>triezenbergj</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I want to place an eccentric point load on the footing to model a temporary support in RC-Pier. &amp;nbsp;What&amp;#39;s the best way to do that? &amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I tried applying a dead load to the footing tab under DC1, however the input is a little confusing and there is no way to visualize the load to verify the location is correct. &amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thanks in advance.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Customized output reports</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/bridge_design___engineering/f/bridgemaster-lars-leap-openbridge-rm-forum/106140/customized-output-reports</link><pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2015 18:52:37 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:a5d36ff6-bf99-4d63-88f1-c8726b980978</guid><dc:creator>triezenbergj</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Is there any way to get a customized output in CONSPAN or LEAP Bridge? For example if I only want to print stresses at the same 4-5 locations along with some other outputs. &amp;nbsp;Is there any way to accomplish this?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>