<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://communities.bentley.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><channel><title>Nick David's Activities</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/members/807a0a13_2d00_9bc1_2d00_4ab0_2d00_82c3_2d00_0d25081e8e7b</link><description>Nick David's recent activity</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 12</generator><item><title>RAM Frame - Rigid Links at Coupling Beams between Concrete Shear Walls</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/ram-staad/f/ram-staad-forum/115318/ram-frame---rigid-links-at-coupling-beams-between-concrete-shear-walls</link><pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2016 15:19:51 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:5d80d611-d5f6-4c72-a05c-ee889e2eee8c</guid><dc:creator>Nick David</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hello,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I am modeling a high-rise concrete structure with lateral force resisting systems consisting of concrete shear walls with coupling beams and slab-column moment frame interactive system (wind only, no seismic loads).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I am trying to understand the modeling feature in RAM Frame - Criteria/General/Wall Elements/ &amp;quot;Include Rigid Link at Fixed Beam-to-Wall Locations&amp;quot;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The available literature from Bentley seems to suggest that this feature is applicable for concrete coupling beams that are modeled as &amp;quot;beam&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;frame&amp;quot; objects (as opposed to coupling beams modeled as wall/shell objects). &amp;nbsp;My concern is that we are modeling the effect of the slab/column frame system with &amp;quot;beam&amp;quot; objects between all columns &amp;amp; walls that have an effective width of ~1/4 the tributary width between column grids. &amp;nbsp;When I check the box in RAM Frame for &amp;quot;Include Rigid Links...&amp;quot; &amp;nbsp;I do not want to turn these slab-beam objects into having the fixed-rotation property that my intended coupling beams do. &amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I noticed in RAM Modeler that you can assign rigid links to beam objects individually (more appropriate for what I need to do), but for some reason the Datacheck flags all of my assigned rigid links as errors, and removes the wall support from between the two levels. &amp;nbsp;Further, if I try to analyze the structure in RAM Frame, the model will not run, and cites the concern that there are un-supported transfer girders on various levels. &amp;nbsp;This seems consistent with what the Datacheck is indicating.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;My main question is&amp;nbsp;&lt;strong&gt;how do I assign individual rigid links to the beam objects I have identified as coupling beams?&lt;/strong&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>