<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://communities.bentley.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><channel><title>Andrew's Activities</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/members/85012bcf_2d00_7fd6_2d00_4412_2d00_bd2f_2d00_be28a8ba2360</link><description>Andrew's recent activity</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 12</generator><item><title>LEAP Steel Service I HL-93 Reactions</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/bridge_design___engineering/f/bridgemaster-lars-leap-openbridge-rm-forum/226829/leap-steel-service-i-hl-93-reactions</link><pubDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2022 16:14:34 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:6605e85d-324c-4b2f-9b53-e83821b5af0b</guid><dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hello all, I have had some issues with LEAP steel pulling reactions when using Line Girder or Grillage analysis.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;These are the Service I HL-93 support reactions when running a Line Girder&amp;nbsp;analysis.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img alt=" " src="/resized-image/__size/415x140/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/5930/4606.Line-Girder-Support-Reactions.PNG" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I am wondering if this is a glitch in LEAP Steel, as the Service I deflections are&amp;nbsp;substantially&amp;nbsp;higher using Line Girder or Grillage analysis compared to FEM, and the live load reactions output in what looks like binary code.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;See FEM results below for comparison.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img alt=" " height="299" src="/resized-image/__size/320x240/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/5930/7142.FEM-Support-Reactions.PNG" width="406" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Could this be a file related issue or a glitch in the program? Versions of LEAP below.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;img alt=" " src="/resized-image/__size/320x240/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/5930/OBD-Version.PNG" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thank you&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Ask A Question I</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/achievements/460ac7df-7ccc-4c42-a204-9e05eef3be09</link><pubDate>Thu, 28 Oct 2021 02:44:56 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:bcd46da6-947e-4428-b6b0-a3d9fe99749e</guid><dc:creator /><description>Ask a question in a forum.</description></item><item><title>LEAP Steel Service II Deformations</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/bridge_design___engineering/f/bridgemaster-lars-leap-openbridge-rm-forum/221420/leap-steel-service-ii-deformations</link><pubDate>Thu, 28 Oct 2021 13:57:26 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:b9b845f1-a0e9-4e01-8356-31e4c4d9bc5c</guid><dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Are there&amp;nbsp;are any known issues with Service II&amp;nbsp;deflections&amp;nbsp;in LEAP steel?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I am getting the same weird results with and without temperature added to the default Service II loads. Also, I am assuming these are long term deformations&amp;nbsp;but LEAP doesn&amp;#39;t explain it well.&amp;nbsp;Beefing up the web depth to the recommended depth-to-span ratio does not improve it much.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img alt=" " src="/resized-image/__size/320x240/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/5930/1st-run-with-temp.PNG" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This is the only design check that is failing.&amp;nbsp;The design summary table shows Strength I controlling at all point of interests.&amp;nbsp;Has anyone encountered this?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thanks all!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>