<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://communities.bentley.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><channel><title>Chris Snider's Communities Activities</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/members/851faeb9_2d00_bf1e_2d00_4e67_2d00_847c_2d00_51dff72c4803</link><description>Recent activity for people in Chris Snider's community</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 12</generator><item><title>Lateral loading on angled building</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/ram-staad/f/ram-staad-forum/145083/lateral-loading-on-angled-building</link><pubDate>Tue, 02 Jan 2018 21:37:49 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:e330a3b3-9039-4d19-8497-92294da687ae</guid><dc:creator>Chris Snider</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I&amp;#39;ve got a building that is in two parts - one orthogonal and the other at 45&amp;deg; - but they are connected and act together. Do I have to run the orthogonal portion, assign frame sizes, etc, and then rotate grids 45&amp;deg; to run the second portion of the building?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="/cfs-file/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/5932/3487.Capture.JPG"&gt;&lt;img src="/resized-image/__size/320x240/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/5932/3487.Capture.JPG" alt=" " /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RAM Foundation reinforcing question</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/ram-staad/f/ram-staad-forum/140007/ram-foundation-reinforcing-question</link><pubDate>Mon, 21 Aug 2017 14:04:42 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:a1be64e9-a38f-4643-98d3-5f9c95b89049</guid><dc:creator>Chris Snider</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I have a fairly small, lightly loaded foundation that Ram Foundation is saying needs an excessive amount of steel - unless I&amp;#39;m missing a reason why.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;ACI318-02, DL = 23.21k, LL = 22.99k, Lr = 4.26k&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It is telling me that I need 4.06 sq in of steel per Section 7.12 (Shrinkage and Temperature).&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="/cfs-file/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/5932/7077.Capture.JPG"&gt;&lt;img src="/resized-image/__size/600x0/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/5932/7077.Capture.JPG" alt=" " /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Am I missing something here? (Also, on my larger, heavily loaded footings, it is also saying 7.12 is the code reference for design here too when moment is controlling this one.) Is this just a bad reference?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Ask A Question I</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/achievements/460ac7df-7ccc-4c42-a204-9e05eef3be09</link><pubDate>Wed, 02 Aug 2017 19:54:05 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:7215181d-c230-43e8-889b-39b8ef3aee32</guid><dc:creator /><description>Ask a question in a forum.</description></item><item><title>RAM Frame and large cantilevers</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/ram-staad/f/ram-staad-forum/139273/ram-frame-and-large-cantilevers</link><pubDate>Wed, 02 Aug 2017 19:54:05 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:97b6ab51-b1fe-486c-88e4-d37d39b733ea</guid><dc:creator>Chris Snider</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I have a stadium project that I&amp;#39;m designing that has a cantilevered roof of approximately 23&amp;#39;. Gravity loading is easily accounted for, but my concern - especially with the large cantilever - is what wind loading is RAM Frame applying. I believe that it is applying the load based on the vertical projection of the building and does not account for the MWFRS uplift on both the top and bottom of the canopy (as well as the uplift on the remainder of the roof). Is this correct?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If it is, I was planning on calculating the MWFRS loading, apply it as a nodal load to the tip of the cantilever and add it to my load combinations. Is this likely the most appropriate way to account for the load?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Any help would be appreciated.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="/cfs-file/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/5932/8267.Capture.JPG"&gt;&lt;img src="/resized-image/__size/320x240/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/5932/8267.Capture.JPG" alt=" " /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>