<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://communities.bentley.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><channel><title>Jyoti Maan's Activities</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/members/8914d37b_2d00_4b96_2d00_4a43_2d00_bcc6_2d00_308032b204e1</link><description>Jyoti Maan's recent activity</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 12</generator><item><title>Looped network for gravity</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/road___site_design/f/geopak-inroads-mx-openroads-forum/238586/looped-network-for-gravity</link><pubDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2022 15:31:19 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:5b9c2e06-518e-4d2d-8606-68e6b43b77db</guid><dc:creator>Jyoti Maan</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I am working open roads drainage and utilities for a road project. The circles are manholes and the squares are catch basins.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The system on the road makes the system looped and if the model is run it shows an error. Is there a way to solve it as a gravity network where a loop is created&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img alt=" " src="/resized-image/__size/320x240/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/5922/project.jpg" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Hammer Transient Analysis : TCV and FCV</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/hydraulics___hydrology/f/haestad-hydraulics-and-hydrology-forum/210064/hammer-transient-analysis-tcv-and-fcv</link><pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2021 14:51:08 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:71fe7a05-0ad9-416d-98f9-d0a5f49163cd</guid><dc:creator>Jyoti Maan</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I need to model a valve closure scenario in Hammer 10.03.02.75 version. What is the better way for modelling&amp;nbsp; a valve closure. Do i use a FCV or TCV? I need to limit the&amp;nbsp;the flow at each consumer to the estimated water demand as per the steady state analysis. If I use a FCV to limit the flow, do i need to set &amp;quot;&lt;span&gt;Modulate Valve during Transient&amp;quot; as true. Can I&amp;nbsp;use a TCV as well for this.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Watergems modelling demands using flow control valves</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/hydraulics___hydrology/f/haestad-hydraulics-and-hydrology-forum/209181/watergems-modelling-demands-using-flow-control-valves</link><pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2021 12:42:04 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:9e91dd32-f344-4e17-8d8c-518b9721bf99</guid><dc:creator>Jyoti Maan</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Does the demands set as a preset flow in the control valve connected to a reservoir will have identical effect for pressure drop calculations same as junction demands.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;How does the preset flow work ? Is it better to provide demands at each node&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Implicit (Sewergems Dynamic Wave) design for storm pipes</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/hydraulics___hydrology/f/haestad-hydraulics-and-hydrology-forum/178852/implicit-sewergems-dynamic-wave-design-for-storm-pipes</link><pubDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2019 13:12:53 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:dfe37833-d862-4ed7-af27-86c6b5076456</guid><dc:creator>Jyoti Maan</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;We are designing a system with storm water pipes, ponds and storage structures. The rainfall data is in time intensity format. The system needs to be checked for three different return periods-5, 10, 20 years.&amp;nbsp;&lt;span&gt;As the storm event is&amp;nbsp;time-depth or time-intensity type,&amp;nbsp;i have adopted Unit Hydrograph as the runoff method with implicit solver. T&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt;he implicit system is doing an analysis of the system. It is not designing the pipe system.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:inherit;"&gt;The velocity and flow for the system is also coming out as zero.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:inherit;"&gt;We need to design a dynamic system with ponds. Please suggest the best possible solver for this case which will design the pipe system and will do routing for the pond as well.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Ask A Question I</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/achievements/460ac7df-7ccc-4c42-a204-9e05eef3be09</link><pubDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2019 02:39:14 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:77686288-72aa-48ca-96a9-f8b10a60e9b0</guid><dc:creator /><description>Ask a question in a forum.</description></item></channel></rss>