<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://communities.bentley.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><channel><title>Neal Styka's Activities</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/members/91ab04be_2d00_d2da_2d00_4f54_2d00_bb08_2d00_10ba78e9c3ca</link><description>Neal Styka's recent activity</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 12</generator><item><title>Discussion Starter I</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/achievements/21025ab1-febb-4fb4-a872-d32a921cb45c</link><pubDate>Sun, 05 Mar 2023 22:01:06 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:d790ea32-bd08-4669-87d0-4a1db4678bd6</guid><dc:creator /><description>Start a discussion in a forum that receives 5 replies.</description></item><item><title>ORD ITL Template Conversion Utility</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/road___site_design/f/geopak-inroads-mx-openroads-forum/184763/ord-itl-template-conversion-utility</link><pubDate>Thu, 29 Aug 2019 19:30:53 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:53798117-8039-4596-a312-ea3c2c9c36ec</guid><dc:creator>Neal Styka</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I used the ITL_ImportExport_Excel-v01.00.13 utility to convert my InRoads SS2 ITL to excel to edit it.&amp;nbsp; After making edits to feature names I exported part of the way through and it worked.&amp;nbsp; Now that I finished the edits in excel I get the error message &amp;quot;Error Reading from ITL file: &amp;quot; &amp;quot;, hexadecimal value 0x03, is an invalid character. Line 1, position 3.&amp;nbsp; Is there a way to figure out what is breaking my ITL import. I&amp;#39;ve spent a few days now editing it to update all of our feature definitions.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thanks,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Neal&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Civil Cell Information</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/road___site_design/f/geopak-inroads-mx-openroads-forum/91902/civil-cell-information</link><pubDate>Sun, 03 Apr 2016 11:26:32 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:de9ab16f-f3ce-4a8e-aaae-f5be3c7e092e</guid><dc:creator>Chuck Lawson</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Bentley Systems, Inc.&amp;nbsp;has been working&amp;nbsp;with the Mississippi Department of Transportation&amp;nbsp;regarding the migration to Open Roads Technology and PowerGEOPAK 08.11.09.493 platform.&amp;nbsp;(Note, this will apply to InRoads and MX as well).&amp;nbsp; One of the things most impressive&amp;nbsp;is what they have done with their Civil Cell Library.&amp;nbsp; Below are a couple of links&amp;nbsp;that will be extremely helpful for those of you beginning to migrate to the new technology and have begun to consider Civil Cells.&amp;nbsp; The first link is a Demo / Q&amp;amp;A on a&amp;nbsp;Ramp&amp;nbsp;Exit Gore area they did.&amp;nbsp; Towards the end of the video Keith also talks about&amp;nbsp;some general tips&amp;nbsp;he&amp;nbsp;embraced during the development of their robust Civil Cell library in general.&amp;nbsp; Also included is their latest workspace environment as well as their documentation page for the new technology.&amp;nbsp; I know a lot of Agencies are currently in the process of developing workspaces.&amp;nbsp; The environment MSDOT has created should give you some excellent ideas to consider.&amp;nbsp; Note, as stated in the video, all of this is public domain and may be freely distributed.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;Note, when selecting the FTP link choose cancel when prompted for a username and password and the file will then proceed to download.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Video Demonstration on Paved Ramp Gores and other general Civil Cell tips and tricks.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="ftp://ftpgeopak@ftp.geopak.com/pub/outgoing/Chuck/Civil_Cell_Demo_Gores_And_Tips_Tricks.zip"&gt;ftp://ftp.geopak.com/pub/outgoing/Chuck/Civil_Cell_Demo_Gores_And_Tips_Tricks.zip&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Their Current Workspace which includes their latest Civil Cell DGN Libraries.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="ftp://ftpgeopak@ftp.geopak.com/pub/outgoing/Chuck/RWDDATA.zip"&gt;ftp://ftp.geopak.com/pub/outgoing/Chuck/RWDDATA.zip&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Their new documentation developed for implementation.&amp;nbsp; Again, very impressive!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://sp.mdot.ms.gov/RoadwayDesign/CADD_Info/Pages/GeoPak-Help.aspx?RootFolder=%2FRoadwayDesign%2FCADD_Info%2FGeoPak%20Help%20Documents%2FSS3&amp;amp;FolderCTID=0x01200038BC55F1C8272F4F9E2A3E49F80FC829&amp;amp;View=%7bFC1D3F67-BD2C-4971-B046-D5236AE9EEC4%7d"&gt;http://sp.mdot.ms.gov/RoadwayDesign/CADD_Info/Pages/GeoPak-Help.aspx?RootFolder=%2FRoadwayDesign%2FCADD_Info%2FGeoPak%20Help%20Documents%2FSS3&amp;amp;FolderCTID=0x01200038BC55F1C8272F4F9E2A3E49F80FC829&amp;amp;View=%7bFC1D3F67-BD2C-4971-B046-D5236AE9EEC4%7d&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thanks&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Chuck Lawson&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Trickle Command Equivalent in ORD</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/road___site_design/f/geopak-inroads-mx-openroads-forum/212073/trickle-command-equivalent-in-ord</link><pubDate>Mon, 05 Apr 2021 19:11:47 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:4e4372ed-e049-47e9-acb7-6de45652237c</guid><dc:creator>Neal Styka</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I&amp;#39;m a long time InRoads user and in design often use the Trickle Command to see if things are flowing correctly and to verify my ditching is working.&amp;nbsp; Is there an equivalent command in OpenRoads?&amp;nbsp; I&amp;#39;ve been trying to use the analyse a point on my corridor model that is displayed and then reading the heads up display of the elevations but find that&amp;#39;s a lot more tedious and I easily miss spots.&amp;nbsp; Any other workarounds or solutions?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thanks,&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Neal&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>[OR] Overlay/stripping components properties</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/road___site_design/f/geopak-inroads-mx-openroads-forum/130707/or-overlay-stripping-components-properties</link><pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2017 23:19:24 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:ccbc5209-226e-437a-8298-8078675f1378</guid><dc:creator>Derek Schmidt</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Does anyone have a demo of the use of overlay and stripping? If it was as simple as &amp;quot;overlay&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;stripping&amp;quot;, we would have two settings in the component properties window. Instead, we have several options.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I know from a provided example that for milling, you want to have the top follow the active surface and the bottom follow the component (as constructed in the template). (Actually, in the example I&amp;#39;m basing this on, it is not a stripping component. I&amp;#39;m not convinced that it matters whether that is toggled on or not.)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I know similarly that for leveling, you want to have the top follow the component and the bottom follow the lowest element (milling, because practically speaking, milling will be the lowest element). (But I misunderstood &amp;quot;Lowest&amp;quot; as I came to this conclusion. Component works just as well for this purpose, in conjunction with the milling component above.)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But there are other options, such as that the top follows the highest, and that the bottom might follow the highest or the surface.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So, partly what I&amp;#39;m confused about is that using&amp;nbsp;any other combination of settings will either do nothing or do something that I can&amp;#39;t predict prior to testing.&amp;nbsp;So, I went hunting for the documentation, which I went through the file explorer to find. (The file is at c:\Program Files (x86)\Bentley\PowerGeopak v8i (SELECTseries)\Documentation\geopak_corridormodeling.chm. The article is under Corridor Modeling &amp;gt; Open Create Template &amp;gt; Properties &amp;gt; Component Properties.)&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Top Option specifies how the top of the component is defined.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Follow Component specifies the top of the component will follow the defined top of the component.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Follow Surface specifies the top of the component will follow the surface (which does not support aliasing).&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Follow Highest specifies the top of the component will follow the highest of the component or surface.
&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;In other words, MAX(component, surface). Without looking at the documentation, &amp;quot;Highest&amp;quot; suggests MAX(surface, set of all components)&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Bottom Option&amp;nbsp;specifies how the bottom of the component is defined. The behavior of these options can be different, depending on the selected Top Option.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Follow Component specifies the bottom of the component will follow the defined top of the component at the defined depth, but will not go above the top of the component.
&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;What, again? It follows the top of the component but will not go above the top of the component? Surely I&amp;#39;m missing something, but what?&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Follow Surface specifies the bottom of the component will follow the surface at the defined depth, but will not cross over the top of the component.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Follow Lowest specifies the bottom of the component will follow the lowest of the component or surface at the defined depths.
&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;In other words, MIN(component, surface) - depth. As noted above, &amp;quot;Lowest&amp;quot; suggests MIN(surface, set of all components) - surface depth.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Follow Highest specifies the bottom of the component will follow the highest of the component or surface at the defined depths.
&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;In other words, MAX(component, surface) - depth.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;p&gt;What if we want to target a specific component or set of components instead? Or even &amp;quot;Design&amp;quot; as we have that option for point constraints.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In any case, I haven&amp;#39;t formed a really solid question around this, but I&amp;#39;m sensing a certain vagueness about the distinction between component depth and surface depth, and the bottom surface of a stripping element seems to be inaccessible to other points in the template.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Does anyone have any advice on how to use all these?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I see Alternate Bottom Surface. This seems to have no function whatsoever. Under what constellation of settings does this do anything? What if I want to use an alternate top surface?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Let me Help You</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/achievements/687f4b6d-e18a-4e55-836c-49926ca2c9d9</link><pubDate>Tue, 11 Feb 2020 17:51:30 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:657bc208-5be2-4a2a-99c9-8fecde4f51e4</guid><dc:creator /><description>Answer a question that is verified as helpful or correct.</description></item><item><title>[Connect] Function Key to Launch Print Organizer</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/microstation/microstation_printing/f/printing-and-plotting-forum/192281/connect-function-key-to-launch-print-organizer</link><pubDate>Tue, 11 Feb 2020 14:57:50 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:77bd60c4-4d92-4691-8206-5624c22d8529</guid><dc:creator>Neal Styka</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;We have been using batch print in Microstation SS2, SS3, and SS4.&amp;nbsp; Now with the move to Connect Edition we are migrating to Print Organizer.&amp;nbsp; We used to have a function key set up to launch batchplot using &amp;quot;mdl load batchplt&amp;quot;&amp;nbsp; is there a similar command we could put in function key menu file that would launch print organizer?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thanks,&lt;br /&gt;Neal&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>[ORD] Seed File Units</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/road___site_design/f/geopak-inroads-mx-openroads-forum/187154/ord-seed-file-units</link><pubDate>Thu, 17 Oct 2019 14:06:24 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:ca7baea2-e3c8-4349-b854-d212c87fc31a</guid><dc:creator>Neal Styka</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I&amp;#39;m trying to set up our Seed files (2D and 3D) for use with ORD Release 2 Update 7.&amp;nbsp; When I open up one of the default Bentley seed files that were recommended to start with I am able to see in Settings-&amp;gt;File-&amp;gt;Design File Settings-&amp;gt;Working Units a complete list of units.&amp;nbsp; We want our master units to be US Survey Feet and then we have Tenths set up as the sub units.&amp;nbsp; I can configure it there correctly but as soon as I open my seed file or create a file based on our seed file in one of our Workspaces then the Master and Sub Unit no longer have any options shown for the units.&amp;nbsp; The only unit is then Custom.&amp;nbsp; So why would using my Workspace no longer show the correct Master Unit?&amp;nbsp; And do I need to worry that it has disappeared?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thanks,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Neal&lt;img alt=" " src="/resized-image/__size/320x240/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/5922/Custom.JPG" /&gt;&lt;img alt=" " src="/resized-image/__size/320x240/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/5922/Survey-Feet.JPG" /&gt;&lt;a href="https://communities.bentley.com/cfs-file/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/5922/KYTC_5F00_Standards_5F00_OC.cfg"&gt;communities.bentley.com/.../KYTC_5F00_Standards_5F00_OC.cfg&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href="https://communities.bentley.com/cfs-file/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/5922/KYTC_5F00_Standards_5F00_WSP.cfg"&gt;communities.bentley.com/.../KYTC_5F00_Standards_5F00_WSP.cfg&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>[ORD] Text Favorite Manager - Only Working with No Workspace</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/road___site_design/f/geopak-inroads-mx-openroads-forum/187156/ord-text-favorite-manager---only-working-with-no-workspace</link><pubDate>Thu, 17 Oct 2019 14:14:44 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:e09abce7-b7e0-4d55-a7ea-452638cfc485</guid><dc:creator>Neal Styka</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi I&amp;#39;m running ORD Release 2 Update 7.&amp;nbsp; I am unable to open the Text Favorite Manager when I open a file with a workspace defined.&amp;nbsp; If I open a file with a workspace open then I get an error in the message center saying that it is an unknown key-in or command.&amp;nbsp; Any idea what variable in my config files would prevent it from opening? I would like to open it with my workspace so that the associated text styles and appropriate levels come in.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thanks,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Neal&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://communities.bentley.com/cfs-file/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/5922/3051.KYTC_5F00_Standards_5F00_OC.cfg"&gt;communities.bentley.com/.../3051.KYTC_5F00_Standards_5F00_OC.cfg&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href="https://communities.bentley.com/cfs-file/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/5922/6675.KYTC_5F00_Standards_5F00_WSP.cfg"&gt;communities.bentley.com/.../6675.KYTC_5F00_Standards_5F00_WSP.cfg&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>[CONNECT] Matching Pattern Attributes From Drawing</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/microstation/f/microstation-forum/185633/connect-matching-pattern-attributes-from-drawing</link><pubDate>Mon, 16 Sep 2019 15:08:11 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:2ca28a4d-b6bc-4d4f-b0cc-cf20165c8d6e</guid><dc:creator>Neal Styka</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A colleague of mine came to me with a problem that started after he upgraded to MicroStation CONNECT edition.&amp;nbsp; In the file there is a legend that shows several different hatch patterns.&amp;nbsp; The workflow in SS2-SS4 has always been to match pattern attributes and then use the pattern area tool to place the pattern in a different part of the drawing.&amp;nbsp; Now when we try to do that same workflow in CE, no pattern is placed.&amp;nbsp; We have the pattern definition set to from file and the pattern name shows up but no pattern is placed.&amp;nbsp; Any ideas on what in CE would break that workflow?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thanks,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Neal&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Civil Cell Creation Using Corridor as a Reference</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/road___site_design/f/geopak-inroads-mx-openroads-forum/183629/civil-cell-creation-using-corridor-as-a-reference</link><pubDate>Tue, 06 Aug 2019 17:50:16 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:7c50630a-bdd6-47cc-b574-9585474aae0e</guid><dc:creator>Neal Styka</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I am trying to create some curb ramp civil cells that would get the vertical information from the edge of pavement from a design corridor.&amp;nbsp; I thought about using the &amp;quot;profile from surface&amp;quot; tool to establish my profile but I don&amp;#39;t want the civil cell to use the active terrain because that is the existing terrain.&amp;nbsp; I want the civil cell to use the elevation of the proposed EOP.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Any ideas?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thanks,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Neal&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Graphical Feature Filter Not Selecting All Features that Match</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/road___site_design/f/geopak-inroads-mx-openroads-forum/168007/graphical-feature-filter-not-selecting-all-features-that-match</link><pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2018 17:02:33 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:f4ee46ca-26e3-4779-92a4-6004d6e35a85</guid><dc:creator>Neal Styka</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I need to generate paving grades in OpenRoads/InRoads SS4 809.903 so my workflow has been to use a graphical filter feature to select the correct features from my corridor and then export to a DTM.&amp;nbsp; My problem right now is that despite having all the features I want added to my filter when I apply the filter it is still missing features that match the definition.&amp;nbsp; It specificlaly is having problems with getting elements with the Road_Sidewalk feature definition which is my back of walk.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="/resized-image/__size/320x240/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/5922/pastedimage1536857724157v1.png" alt=" " /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The green triangles are the triangles from the DTM I am creating and as you can see it is missing the back of walk.&amp;nbsp; If I check at that station what the template is set up as it will show that the feature there is the Road Sidewalk feature definition.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="/resized-image/__size/320x240/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/5922/pastedimage1536857993295v2.png" alt=" " /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="/resized-image/__size/320x240/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/5922/pastedimage1536858114826v3.png" alt=" " /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Any ideas on what&amp;#39;s happening?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thanks,&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Neal&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Import from GPK not Updating Alignments in SS4</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/road___site_design/f/geopak-inroads-mx-openroads-forum/169440/import-from-gpk-not-updating-alignments-in-ss4</link><pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2018 21:18:08 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:a06a1443-cf9b-4a2c-aa03-8f40facb7e3e</guid><dc:creator>Keith Kennon</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Suddenly, when I Import Geometry from my GPK my existing civil alignments are not being updated. I have done this over and over again 50 times successfully in this drawing. For some reason the Import is creating additional alignments. My corridors have control points using those alignments and so they are not being updated unless I reassign the control points. If I delete the alignments before importing, it recreates the alignments with the correct name, but the control points are missing from the corridors so I have to reassign them anyway.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I have done this 50 times before. Why is this suddenly different?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Drafting in SS4 Using OpenRoads</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/road___site_design/f/geopak-inroads-mx-openroads-forum/158280/drafting-in-ss4-using-openroads</link><pubDate>Thu, 19 Jul 2018 13:14:37 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:246a43a0-d43e-4f23-81f1-55ac7a083a4f</guid><dc:creator>Neal Styka</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Is there a way to annotate/place a drafting note within OpenRoads/Microstation and not having to use Native InRoads.&amp;nbsp; I&amp;#39;m using InRoads 8.11.09.878.&amp;nbsp; Specifically I&amp;#39;d like to place notes that have Station, offset and elevation.&amp;nbsp; Right now I am trying to use the drafting notes with InRoads-&amp;gt;Drafting Menu but that means I have to convert all of my corridors to a DTM first and I am also having trouble getting the text oriented correctly.&amp;nbsp; The info is already available if I have civil accudraw turned on but I really want to be able to not have to export my corridors each time.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thanks,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Neal&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Bulk Exporting of Alignments to XML</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/road___site_design/f/geopak-inroads-mx-openroads-forum/157100/bulk-exporting-of-alignments-to-xml</link><pubDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2018 16:55:52 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:a8731d03-6806-4c7a-8886-900171e2cf17</guid><dc:creator>Neal Styka</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Is there a way in InRoads SS2 or in Native SS4 to bulk export/translate alignments to XML.&amp;nbsp; For example I have 15 individual alignments and I&amp;#39;d like all of them to be converted to XML to share with a colleague. Or is there a way to translate an entire ALG?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thanks,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Neal&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>