<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://communities.bentley.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><channel><title>Marie Joy Yamauchi's Activities</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/members/94e697e8_2d00_2de5_2d00_48c2_2d00_93fa_2d00_2c55eb958737</link><description>Marie Joy Yamauchi's recent activity</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 12</generator><item><title>ERROR:MEMBER- slender section, design skipped</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/ram-staad/f/ram-staad-forum/194847/error-member--slender-section-design-skipped</link><pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2020 12:29:28 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:a4a4fa88-483a-474a-86e4-91dd8d56be4f</guid><dc:creator>Marie Joy Yamauchi</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hello again!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I&amp;#39;m currently using the code AIJ 2005 and upon running analysis,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;some members are skipped because of an error: slender section.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I tried TMAIN and MAIN = 1, and commented the ly lz parameters but it didn&amp;#39;t disappear.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;SEND HELP.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Please and Thank you!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Modal Frequency Calculation output details</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/ram-staad/f/ram-staad-forum/214513/modal-frequency-calculation-output-details</link><pubDate>Fri, 28 May 2021 00:55:29 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:d80264f9-a9a9-41cf-8eca-b98ce41995c1</guid><dc:creator>Marie Joy Yamauchi</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Good day, everyone!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;My query is about using the Modal Frequency Calculation...&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I&amp;#39;ve been checking the modal frequency of the structure as a whole but the client asked how we deal with the concentrated loads in the middle of the beams.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I said that if they wanted to check the frequency considering the local displacement of the members, we&amp;#39;ll have to add joints at the load locations and run the model again.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But they don&amp;#39;t want that because it&amp;#39;s too much of a hassle and just want the detailed output.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I&amp;#39;ve never seen a detailed output for Frequency Calculation but is there a detailed output or a way to check the how STAAD deals with members that have a concentrated load at the middle?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thank you in advance!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>STAAD Advanced Concrete design: text schedule font problem</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/ram-staad/f/ram-staad-forum/209088/staad-advanced-concrete-design-text-schedule-font-problem</link><pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2021 01:01:24 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:5adf87d1-52f9-467e-94d7-efedcc9821f9</guid><dc:creator>Marie Joy Yamauchi</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Good day, people!&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I just wanted to ask re: printing of text schedule in STAAD RCDC.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When I print the text schedule, I can&amp;#39;t read the reinforcement details because they&amp;#39;re all in symbols.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;How do I fix this?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img alt=" " height="288" src="/resized-image/__size/320x240/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/5932/STAAD-RCDC-report.JPG" width="691" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="/resized-image/__size/320x240/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/5932/pastedimage1611881933887v1.png" alt=" " /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thank you in advance!!!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Reason for slow STAAD.Pro model analysis</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/ram-staad/f/ram-staad-forum/207308/reason-for-slow-staad-pro-model-analysis</link><pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2020 07:49:22 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:ba8f7287-b419-44f9-b3ef-8b2dc64dc39d</guid><dc:creator>Marie Joy Yamauchi</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hello!&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I would just like to ask&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I am working on a big model like 25m by 180m and upon running the analysis, it stopped at RUN BY LOAD CASE or something.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So I took a part out and removed some plates and turned all braces into truss members.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It&amp;#39;s now like 30% of the original model but when running the analysis (Until past the load combination), it took around 20 mins.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Is there a reason why it&amp;#39;s taking this long?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I&amp;#39;m not sure if it&amp;#39;s because of all the repeat loads but I saw other models with this format and it didn&amp;#39;t take that long.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Please and thank you! &amp;lt;3&lt;a href="https://communities.bentley.com/cfs-file/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/5932/Simple-model.STD"&gt;communities.bentley.com/.../Simple-model.STD&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>STAAD.Pro CONNECT EDITION AIJ 2005</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/ram-staad/f/ram-staad-forum/194675/staad-pro-connect-edition-aij-2005</link><pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2020 10:44:12 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:d4edf0b1-e2ee-478a-bb42-24d90226f4e3</guid><dc:creator>Marie Joy Yamauchi</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;We used STAAD.Pro SS6 before and to separate the long term case and the short term case, we used the parameter TMP which does not divide the FYLD by 1.5.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the new CONNECT Edition, the allowable is always divided by 1.5 and the TMP parameter is gone.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;How do we solve this without multiplying factors to the load combination?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Ask A Question I</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/achievements/460ac7df-7ccc-4c42-a204-9e05eef3be09</link><pubDate>Fri, 24 Nov 2017 00:07:35 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:cec9c6d9-9f14-4d35-ac29-29a59e0cbfab</guid><dc:creator /><description>Ask a question in a forum.</description></item><item><title>STAAD Foundation : Multiple columns in one footing</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/ram-staad/f/ram-staad-forum/143571/staad-foundation-multiple-columns-in-one-footing</link><pubDate>Fri, 24 Nov 2017 07:05:52 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:9b58c731-f687-4e0b-a016-aaee32255aff</guid><dc:creator>Marie Joy Yamauchi</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Is it possible to design a footing carrying 3 columns in STAAD Foundation?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It can&amp;#39;t be counted as combined since the 3rd column isn&amp;#39;t collinear with the other two.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Is it considered as a mat foundation?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I am using STAAD Foundation v.08.00.01.33&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>STAAD FOUNDATION : &amp;quot;NOT FOUND&amp;quot; in Output</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/ram-staad/f/ram-staad-forum/138243/staad-foundation-not-found-in-output</link><pubDate>Fri, 07 Jul 2017 03:56:21 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:90fc43e4-c937-4162-bb55-7a068d09dca6</guid><dc:creator>Marie Joy Yamauchi</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I am currently using STAAD FOUNDATION and as far as I know, whenever a footing design fails, no calculation sheet is produced. Somehow, though, calculation sheets are produced but in the output section, it says for main reinforcements &amp;quot;NOT FOUND&amp;quot;. Is this a bug or did the footing design really fail?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>