<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://communities.bentley.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><channel><title>Mark Bozzo's Communities Activities</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/members/9ae49574_2d00_75a0_2d00_4846_2d00_b926_2d00_9e7ccc188ac9</link><description>Recent activity for people in Mark Bozzo's community</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 12</generator><item><title>RAM Frame OCBF Chevron beam check - unbalanced load info missing</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/ram-staad/f/ram-staad-forum/242700/ram-frame-ocbf-chevron-beam-check---unbalanced-load-info-missing</link><pubDate>Thu, 09 Mar 2023 17:23:56 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:19456a4f-babe-42a3-8f62-94bdbe503c73</guid><dc:creator>Mark Bozzo</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;For some reason, RAM Frame is not reporting the unbalanced brace loads in the Seismic Provisions &amp;gt; OCBF-V beam output.&amp;nbsp; Is this a software bug or did I miss a setting somewhere?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;img style="max-height:240px;max-width:320px;" src="/resized-image/__size/640x480/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/5932/pastedimage1678382605580v1.png" alt=" " /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Let me Help You</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/achievements/687f4b6d-e18a-4e55-836c-49926ca2c9d9</link><pubDate>Fri, 10 Mar 2023 18:41:46 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:d92b50cf-c7c8-43b3-96bc-febc5989f2e2</guid><dc:creator /><description>Answer a question that is verified as helpful or correct.</description></item><item><title>Ask A Question I</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/achievements/460ac7df-7ccc-4c42-a204-9e05eef3be09</link><pubDate>Thu, 09 Mar 2023 02:01:42 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:87660af7-4be5-4087-be67-a2a439779f06</guid><dc:creator /><description>Ask a question in a forum.</description></item><item><title>RAM Connection CE - No connections could be assigned</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/ram-staad/f/ram-staad-forum/116001/ram-connection-ce---no-connections-could-be-assigned</link><pubDate>Sat, 13 Feb 2016 00:22:33 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:a5923777-e78f-41e2-ae6a-d73ba08f7fd3</guid><dc:creator>Mark Bozzo</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;When attempting to assign connections in RC (version 11.0.0.177), I get a message like this anytime I try to assign a connection:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p style="margin-left:30px;"&gt;&lt;code&gt;[Error] No connections could be assigned to joint &amp;quot;Node(214) - Column(417) - Beam(211) - Beam(212) - Brace(443)&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;[Information] Internal design error in the connection. Please contact technical support&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/code&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Any ideas as to how I can troubleshoot this issue?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RAM Foundation - Overstrength Factor</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/ram-staad/f/ram-staad-forum/116707/ram-foundation---overstrength-factor</link><pubDate>Fri, 04 Mar 2016 23:52:29 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:8e7ecd9e-fa0d-4d32-9221-db6f38b7e89b</guid><dc:creator>Mark Bozzo</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;California Building Code requires that foundation reinforcement must be designed using overstrength load combinations (section 1616.10.14). &amp;nbsp;When I include the overstrength combinations in the &amp;quot;Custom Concrete Load Combinations&amp;quot; dialog, the footing sizes at lateral elements are increased dramatically. &amp;nbsp;My best guess is that this is to account for what the program perceives as additional overturning. &amp;nbsp;This results in unnecessarily large footings. &amp;nbsp;Is there a way to allow RAM Foundation to ONLY design the reinforcement (and not footing size or soil pressure)&amp;nbsp;for overstrength?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>How to properly model X-braces in RAM Structural System?</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/ram-staad/f/ram-staad-forum/125483/how-to-properly-model-x-braces-in-ram-structural-system</link><pubDate>Wed, 31 Aug 2016 01:14:03 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:5c30433d-5a9d-4ac9-bb2b-5ef0fa442644</guid><dc:creator>Mark Bozzo</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;What&amp;#39;s the proper way to model X-braces in RAM? &amp;nbsp;I used the &amp;quot;X&amp;quot; looking profile in the modeler, but this does not create the node/joint at the center of the X.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RAM Structural System will not open unless run as administrator</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/ram-staad/f/ram-staad-forum/104014/ram-structural-system-will-not-open-unless-run-as-administrator</link><pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2015 19:56:41 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:d827a20d-5746-4a87-9a9a-95518d41b7c9</guid><dc:creator>Mark Bozzo</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;One user in our office is not able to run RAM SS unless performing a Right Click&amp;gt;Run as Administrator. &amp;nbsp;The viewer runs just fine, as well as RAM Concept and RAM connection. &amp;nbsp;Does anyone have a solution for this issue?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Offset frames with flexible diaphragms</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/ram-staad/f/ram-staad-forum/100651/offset-frames-with-flexible-diaphragms</link><pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2014 19:07:11 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:70dc6a5c-3217-4112-834f-95f0111a7ae2</guid><dc:creator>Mark Bozzo</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I&amp;#39;m using RAM Structural System. &amp;nbsp;Is it possible to analyze a building with brace frames that do not align from one floor to the next when the diaphragm is assumed flexible? &amp;nbsp;For example, if there is a penthouse or similar structure above the roof and the brace frames for the penthouse do not align with any frames below. &amp;nbsp;Thank you!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>