<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://communities.bentley.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><channel><title>Julien Richard's Activities</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/members/9d8a0106_2d00_830b_2d00_4c57_2d00_818d_2d00_9836bda44a1d</link><description>Julien Richard's recent activity</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 12</generator><item><title>Exception[access violation]Raised! Aborting Analysis.....</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/ram-staad/f/ram-staad-forum/111724/exception-access-violation-raised-aborting-analysis</link><pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2015 15:20:05 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:48d516fb-3e93-4e8f-9f02-20c3c61044fe</guid><dc:creator>Julien Richard</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hello,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I try to run the analysis and CODE CHECK with a LOAD LIST using AISC 360-10 on a pretty big STAAD model and I receive the error message &amp;quot;Exception[access violation]Raised! Aborting Analysis.....&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I have read other post on this forum relating that problem on which it says that it should be fixed with the release 20.07.10.65. However, I use release 20.07.10.66 and SS? and I still got that problem. If I reduce the number of load cases in the LOAD&amp;nbsp; LIST command, STAAD complete the analysis. I would like to know how I can run the analysis and CODE CHECK for all the load cases specified.&amp;nbsp;You will find my STAAD.Pro model attached.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thanks in advance,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Julien Richard, Eng, M.A.Sc.&lt;br /&gt;HATCH&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://communities.bentley.com/cfs-file/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/5932/Building-model.std"&gt;communities.bentley.com/.../Building-model.std&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>OpenSTAAD clear selection function ?</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/ram-staad/f/ram-staad-forum/92928/openstaad-clear-selection-function</link><pubDate>Wed, 20 Sep 2017 08:25:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:1f800bdb-c0d0-47a3-9556-169ee1accc5f</guid><dc:creator>Julien Richard</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I would like to know if an OpenSTAAD function that unselect the selected items exists. Even if I think this should be a basic funtion, I am unable to find it.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Regards,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Julien Richard&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>OpenSTAAD - Function to get nodal loads for a specific load case</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/ram-staad/f/ram-staad-forum/96872/openstaad---function-to-get-nodal-loads-for-a-specific-load-case</link><pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2014 13:15:33 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:c50b271c-5994-4e00-917a-7dfaa68f93e6</guid><dc:creator>Julien Richard</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I am looking for an OpenSTAAD&amp;nbsp;function that allow to get nodal loads for a specific load case. I know the function &amp;quot;Load.GetNodalLoads&amp;quot; but it is not very practical for use when we want the loads for one load case in particular, especially if the load case numbers do not follow each other.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thanks in advance&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Julien Richard&lt;br /&gt;HATCH&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Exception[access violation]Raised! Aborting Analysis.....</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/ram-staad/f/ram-staad-forum/103996/exception-access-violation-raised-aborting-analysis</link><pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2015 05:45:11 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:e5125ea7-9897-4897-bdef-8ec1151c2516</guid><dc:creator>Bubalan Sundaram</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Dear All,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I run a roof structure in which i get the following error and it terminates the analysis.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Exception [Access Violation] Raised! Aborting Analysis....&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But other models run fine,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;can anyone solve the issue...&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Staad version: 20.07.10.64&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;regards&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Bubalan&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>STAAD.Pro SS5 - Response spectrum Issue</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/ram-staad/f/ram-staad-forum/96754/staad-pro-ss5---response-spectrum-issue</link><pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2014 19:44:03 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:73f7bfa3-9a96-4efd-b993-0535fa056859</guid><dc:creator>Julien Richard</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I just updated my version of STAAD.Pro to SS5 and I realize that the &amp;quot;Signed Response Spectrum Results&amp;quot; does not work as in my the SS3. I tried to use the signs associated to the dominant mode and I also tried to just use the signed results. In both cases, member forces are always changing in sign along the member length (compression at one end and tension at the other). With the Select Series 3, the member forces were consitant along the member length as for static loading. Is it a bug with that release of STAAD or it is wanted in order to capture the effect of the Spectrum applied in both directions using a single analysis ??&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thanks for your help.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Julien Richard, P.Eng &lt;br /&gt;HATCH&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>