Bentley Communities
Site
Search
User
Site
Search
User
Welcome
Products
Support
About
More
Cancel
Jack Riesenberg, P.E.
Likes
Profile
Activity
Communities
Friends
Likes
Achievements
Bookmarks
Blog Posts
Questions
More
Cancel
RE: Civil Item Type Priority.json Syntax
Dan.Ahern
Currently the item types conflict resolution engine and related JSON file are specific to the civil tools. Extending this type of functionality to MicroStation tools is being considered for a future version.
over 2 years ago
OpenRoads | OpenSite
OpenRoads | OpenSite Forum
RE: Civil Item Type Priority.json Syntax
Dan.Ahern
The default behavior of the software is to preserve as much item type data as possible while also managing any conflicts. When a conflict occurs the default behavior is to preserve the item type on first element selected and move it to the new element…
over 2 years ago
OpenRoads | OpenSite
OpenRoads | OpenSite Forum
RE: Is there a way to add comments in the Item Type Expressions?
Jan Šlegr
Hi Jack, Jack Riesenberg, P.E. said: but I am not seeing a way to add a comment to an expression. no, it's not possible. It's the way how Expressions are defined in EC XML standard as CalculatedECPropertySpecification custom attribute now. Jack…
over 3 years ago
MicroStation
MicroStation Forum
RE: Is there a way to add comments in the Item Type Expressions?
Jan Šlegr
Hi Jack, Jack Riesenberg, P.E. said: I will look into the named expressions a bit more and see if I can implement them and make the suggestion for the enhancement. Probably I did not wrote it clearly enough: I mentioned Named Expressions as an example…
over 3 years ago
MicroStation
MicroStation Forum
RE: Civil Display Browser - Why was it's functionality removed and what it is the new workflow?
Liam Wilks
Ian, you must be aware of these issues already (corrupt elements, crashing when simply hovering over an element with cursor). I am not aware of anyone using this product who has not experienced them from time to time. Either the issues are so complex…
over 4 years ago
OpenRoads | OpenSite
OpenRoads | OpenSite Forum
RE: Civil Display Browser - Why was it's functionality removed and what it is the new workflow?
Derek Schmidt
>The results of the 'repair' actions are misleading since it doesn't 'repair' but deletes broken rules so while it might appear to 'fix' something, in many instances it actually made the situation worse with static models and further rule failures further…
over 4 years ago
OpenRoads | OpenSite
OpenRoads | OpenSite Forum
RE: Civil Display Browser - Why was it's functionality removed and what it is the new workflow?
Justin Guiliano
<Rant> This response pretty much hits right at the frustration most end users have with ORD specifically, and Bentley in general. While the Civil Display Browser key-in was treated like a safety blanket for most of us and is a relatively minor thing…
over 4 years ago
OpenRoads | OpenSite
OpenRoads | OpenSite Forum
RE: ORD 2018 update 4, civil display browser - we cannot delete any element now?
JeremieDL
I completly agree with you, I have spent so many hours just for deleting corrupted entity. And also I never got an email adress to send corrupted files.
over 5 years ago
OpenRoads | OpenSite
OpenRoads | OpenSite Forum
RE: ORD 2018 update 4, civil display browser - we cannot delete any element now?
JeremieDL
Ok so what is the workflow if I have a bad files? share it with everyone? not the best way. I don't mind to send it to you, what is your email? Because right now I have a file that I just use the compress command with the external reference dialog box…
over 5 years ago
OpenRoads | OpenSite
OpenRoads | OpenSite Forum
ORD 2018 update 4, civil display browser - we cannot delete any element now?
JeremieDL
We use to be able to delete some corrupted elements (because that do happen with corridor element and or civil geometry) using the command key-in "civil display browser" but now it only display bad elements. Now what is the way to do?
over 5 years ago
OpenRoads | OpenSite
OpenRoads | OpenSite Forum