<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://communities.bentley.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><channel><title>Hayden Streater's Activities</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/members/abbc88c1_2d00_e027_2d00_41a0_2d00_a7e0_2d00_d7cf87a5396e</link><description>Hayden Streater's recent activity</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 12</generator><item><title>For Log reports, is there a way to start the log a depth other than ground surface?</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/geotechnical1/f/geotechnical-forum/106413/for-log-reports-is-there-a-way-to-start-the-log-a-depth-other-than-ground-surface</link><pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2015 19:37:46 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:77dee46c-5454-49d5-8a3d-947f0a7bbc27</guid><dc:creator>Paul Freyer</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I have several logs that the overburden material were not logged, and the descriptions begin at the top of bedrock. On our current report template this results in a lot of blank log space (multiple pages given the depth log page required to accommodate later descriptions). &amp;nbsp;I there a way to provide a starting depth for the log descriptions to eliminate this blank space?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Project located within two UTM zones</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/geotechnical1/f/geotechnical-forum/146777/project-located-within-two-utm-zones</link><pubDate>Thu, 08 Feb 2018 02:13:35 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:1affd505-4e67-41a6-bfdc-4bff60bc608e</guid><dc:creator>Hayden Streater</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hello - I have a project where the borehole locations span over two UTM zones. Is there a way to specify a hole specific UTM zone, rather than a project zone?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thanks,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Hayden&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Ask A Question I</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/achievements/460ac7df-7ccc-4c42-a204-9e05eef3be09</link><pubDate>Thu, 08 Feb 2018 02:13:36 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:ccb9f90f-edae-44e9-98b1-f4cf81067bc7</guid><dc:creator /><description>Ask a question in a forum.</description></item><item><title>Representing Subsurface data in 3D</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/geotechnical1/f/keynetix-forum/113470/representing-subsurface-data-in-3d</link><pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2015 10:14:50 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:ef573079-1c6a-4bd3-aeb8-f11ed56722f0</guid><dc:creator>Atticus Borrie</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It is possible to connect a HoleBASE database to AutoCAD Civil 3D and show a 3D representation of borehole data in 3D as well as an (best guess and often wrong but cleanable) interpolated surface. &amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;We don&amp;#39;t have Civil 3D but we do have access to a Holebase database (we don&amp;#39;t have gINT). &amp;nbsp;Is there any way of connecting this up to bring the info into a DGN environment?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Failing that is it possible to use the AGS data somehow? &amp;nbsp;Considering it includes location specific info. as well as the composition data surely there must be a way to bring this information into a 3D space.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Any thoughts?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>