<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://communities.bentley.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><channel><title>Emily Gordon's Activities</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/members/b2a4572c_2d00_a61c_2d00_4019_2d00_92a3_2d00_99999ac54512</link><description>Emily Gordon's recent activity</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 12</generator><item><title>Separate sheet files from drainage models</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/road___site_design/f/geopak-inroads-mx-openroads-forum/245848/separate-sheet-files-from-drainage-models</link><pubDate>Fri, 26 May 2023 19:46:09 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:e452cfbf-93fd-42c9-a0f1-b7d5a36bfdc8</guid><dc:creator>Emily Gordon</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Is there a way to create a file that just is a sheet model with the drainage plan and drainage profiles? The workflow for the FDOT workspace has the sheet within the model dgn but i am having issues with crashes during modeling that ends up corrupting both the database, drawing and sheets. I would like to keep everything separate in the event of a crash, resheeting these files is becoming quite an issue.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The sheets have the plan views, profiles of pipes, and tablature data in them&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thanks,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Emily&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>How to model a Crown point that doesn&amp;#39;t match alignment.</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/road___site_design/f/geopak-inroads-mx-openroads-forum/243000/how-to-model-a-crown-point-that-doesn-t-match-alignment</link><pubDate>Thu, 16 Mar 2023 14:40:34 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:5068060d-c46f-4778-aa9d-ffc0ffd110d9</guid><dc:creator>Emily Gordon</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Good Morning we are modeling a corridor, in one section we want to shift the crown point from the alignment.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img style="max-height:240px;max-width:320px;" src="/resized-image/__size/640x480/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/5922/pastedimage1678977422844v1.png" alt=" " /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Currently we have the alignment as the controlling point for our template. We want the crown point modelled in our corridor, but we want to maintain the 0 offset for the CL. Would a point control work for this or would it then make the CP offset 0?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img style="max-height:240px;max-width:320px;" src="/resized-image/__size/640x480/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/5922/pastedimage1678977594049v2.png" alt=" " /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Printing Issues - ORD Rasterized 3D element and Sheet borders</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/road___site_design/f/geopak-inroads-mx-openroads-forum/244002/printing-issues---ord-rasterized-3d-element-and-sheet-borders</link><pubDate>Mon, 10 Apr 2023 20:34:06 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:988599c2-b4ed-4593-ad30-5339b6466e64</guid><dc:creator>Emily Gordon</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Good Afternoon,&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;We are printing cross sections with our 3D utilities models referenced in. When we print our standard sheets, the crossing utility features do not show up until we enable &amp;quot;Rasterized&amp;quot; in the print dialog. Enabling this checkbox disables the printing of our annotation in our drawing models such as gridlines and our sheet borders in the sheet model. It also forces everything to print in color.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Is there anyway to enable all the elements, 2D and 3D crossing elements to print in greyscale?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thanks,&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Emily&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Cross Section Annotation - 3D Linear Elements</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/road___site_design/f/geopak-inroads-mx-openroads-forum/243199/cross-section-annotation---3d-linear-elements</link><pubDate>Tue, 21 Mar 2023 20:12:39 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:16224bde-c21f-4dd4-b82e-67a02f46ceba</guid><dc:creator>Karim Meleka</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi everyone,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I am trying to find a way to annotate 3D linear features in&amp;nbsp;cross-sections, currently the annotation definitions / Groups for points and segment rely on the template points only, as I understand it.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;However I am not sure if there is way to annotate Sta / Off / Slope for 3D linear feature that are not included in the template. Previously, Inroads SS2 we had the capability to annotate existing DTM features on cross-sections which was a very convenient for analysis and evaluation.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I am using Openroads Designer 2021 Release 1&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Hydraulic Profiles not Generating - Database issue- Drainage ORD</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/road___site_design/f/geopak-inroads-mx-openroads-forum/243246/hydraulic-profiles-not-generating---database-issue--drainage-ord</link><pubDate>Wed, 22 Mar 2023 19:03:05 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:04f0c19f-0267-45fa-8288-0c55c454469c</guid><dc:creator>Emily Gordon</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I recently had to update the trunkline for a drainage network. I am updating the hydraulic run to outfall but when i click the prompts, I get an exception log.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img style="max-height:240px;max-width:320px;" alt=" " src="/resized-image/__size/640x480/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/5922/pastedimage1679511410577v2.png" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img alt=" " height="31" src="/resized-image/__size/1102x62/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/5922/pastedimage1679511378185v1.png" width="551" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If I use the hydraulic run from node and click the last node and click the outfall it follows the old layout&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img style="max-height:240px;max-width:320px;" alt=" " src="/resized-image/__size/640x480/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/5922/pastedimage1679512707617v1.png" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I have redrawn the conduits, but i am still getting this error. I have compacted the database and resynched the drawing also, but these issues are still persisting.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;When i do the model integrity check i get these errors (see photo below) It looks like there is some miscommunication between the database and links, I am unsure how to remediate these issues.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Is this file salvagable? I am apprehensive to start new file from scratch because there are quite a few custom feature definitions being used for different sized manhole bottoms.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img style="max-height:240px;max-width:320px;" alt=" " src="/resized-image/__size/640x480/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/5922/pastedimage1679511577489v3.png" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thanks,&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Emily&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Cross Section Width Annotation</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/road___site_design/f/geopak-inroads-mx-openroads-forum/242844/cross-section-width-annotation</link><pubDate>Mon, 13 Mar 2023 15:17:34 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:da389fd4-713f-4ce5-85fa-752b9c028c14</guid><dc:creator>Emily Gordon</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hello,&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Typically, we use the points from the template for slope, so i was thinking to use the points for the width annotation. However, our workspace does not have an existing &amp;quot;width&amp;quot; annotation group so I&amp;nbsp;am unsure how to add the expression to annotate the width since there is nothing to piggyback off of.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thanks,&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Emily&amp;nbsp;&lt;img style="max-height:240px;max-width:320px;" src="/resized-image/__size/640x480/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/5922/pastedimage1678720714054v1.png" alt=" " /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Custom Conduit Sizes - Utilities</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/road___site_design/f/geopak-inroads-mx-openroads-forum/242357/custom-conduit-sizes---utilities</link><pubDate>Thu, 02 Mar 2023 15:01:51 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:09700187-5a3d-40e1-8e7a-3a03b01b96bf</guid><dc:creator>Emily Gordon</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Good morning,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; We received some survey with utilities depths and sizes. Some of the utilities have sizes that are not within the options in the conduit sizes. So we decided to create custom prototypes within the file.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;We have a separate utlities model and dgn with each utility type. For sanitary sewers and force mains we were able to use the conduit catalog to add new sizes and draw them in.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;img style="max-height:240px;max-width:320px;" alt=" " src="/resized-image/__size/640x480/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/5922/pastedimage1677769350799v2.png" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;However, for other utilities, they are not populating in the conduit catalog and there is no way to add new sizes. Here is the catalog for the file with the gas lines drawn in.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;img style="max-height:240px;max-width:320px;" alt=" " src="/resized-image/__size/640x480/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/5922/pastedimage1677769363751v3.png" /&gt;&lt;img style="max-height:240px;max-width:320px;" src="/resized-image/__size/640x480/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/5922/pastedimage1677769535811v1.png" alt=" " /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;How do we add custom sizes for utilities that do not populate in the conduit catalog?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Move a Horizontal Geometric element  with linked elements</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/road___site_design/f/geopak-inroads-mx-openroads-forum/241974/move-a-horizontal-geometric-element-with-linked-elements</link><pubDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2023 18:19:36 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:93fe8c51-5d65-41f5-bb1c-28aff8f5187d</guid><dc:creator>Emily Gordon</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hello,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; I am laying out a rough placement for a roundabout. I have the splitter islands and approach lanes dynamically linked to the inscribed circle, all were placed using the horizontal geometry tools. I want to move the location of the center of the&amp;nbsp;circle but it does not allow me to shift its location.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Is there a&amp;nbsp;way to retain the dyanamic relationships and shift the circle?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img style="max-height:240px;max-width:320px;" src="/resized-image/__size/640x480/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/5922/pastedimage1677003614574v1.png" alt=" " /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thanks,&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Emily&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Feature Definitions - Pipes</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/road___site_design/f/geopak-inroads-mx-openroads-forum/241596/feature-definitions---pipes</link><pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2023 14:12:18 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:be3ed759-caa3-4ffe-9786-5a4a62a732f5</guid><dc:creator>Emily Gordon</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Is there a way to create custom feature definitions to display crossing pipes in ORD?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;We want to keep these custom feature definitions separate from the SUE/SUDA database. We want to be able to display crossing features with the correct diameters and displayed cells but want to avoid making Utilities Feature definition as some modifying tools don&amp;#39;t work with those feature types.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;These are subject to change, so we want to keep the ability to manipulate and add vertices after they are placed.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thanks,&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Emily&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Let me Help You</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/achievements/687f4b6d-e18a-4e55-836c-49926ca2c9d9</link><pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2023 00:01:50 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:257cee11-336a-4799-b44a-594047e552fb</guid><dc:creator /><description>Answer a question that is verified as helpful or correct.</description></item><item><title>ORD SUE/SUDA - Custom Drainage Nodes - Skew and Translation</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/road___site_design/f/geopak-inroads-mx-openroads-forum/241370/ord-sue-suda---custom-drainage-nodes---skew-and-translation</link><pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2023 15:32:20 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:354ce921-4444-4028-8cbb-cec42afbbf0c</guid><dc:creator>Emily Gordon</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I created a custom drainage node. I want it to skew and shift it orientation with respect to the inlet. I changed the rotation and location of the bottom cell with respect to the alignment line and the point, however the cell translation has not updated. I tried restarting ORD, to ensure the Cell updates were up to date.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I had created this custome bottom cell (I named it something obvious because I wanted to make sure I wasn&amp;rsquo;t picking a default cell), you can see the skew and shift in the cell model below: I am using a standard top cell for our inlet.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img style="height:158px;max-height:158px;max-width:432px;" height="158" src="/resized-image/__size/864x316/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/5922/pastedimage1675783602403v4.png" width="431" alt=" " /&gt;&lt;img style="max-height:240px;max-width:320px;" src="/resized-image/__size/640x480/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/5922/pastedimage1675783651364v5.png" alt=" " /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the drainage file I am in, I had created the element template, feature symbology and feature definition for the new bottom cell. &amp;nbsp;The updated symbology takes the skew change but it looks like it is still rotating about the center of the structure. Is there a way to remediate this? To shift the top/bottom cell with respect to eachother?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img style="max-height:240px;max-width:320px;" src="/resized-image/__size/640x480/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/5922/pastedimage1675783790218v7.png" alt=" " /&gt;&lt;img style="max-height:240px;max-width:320px;" src="/resized-image/__size/640x480/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/5922/pastedimage1675783798657v8.png" alt=" " /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Here is an example of what is happening you can see that the top of inlet is attached to the center of the bottom cell.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="/resized-image/__size/640x480/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/5922/pastedimage1675783760387v6.png" alt=" " /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>2D contours from terrain file</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/road___site_design/f/geopak-inroads-mx-openroads-forum/240472/2d-contours-from-terrain-file</link><pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2023 20:15:07 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:ce6c14b7-0781-4475-9d28-56fbcca53594</guid><dc:creator>Emily Gordon</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hello,&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I have a&amp;nbsp;3-mile corridor that was modelled in ORD, there were 4 models. I created a combined terrain with all the proposed models and added it to my existing ground to create a final surface.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I want to display contours only in a 2D plan veiw. Is there a way to extract the graphics to 2D? Displaying the contours via the terrain model properties in ORD bogs down the processing of the software and leads to frequent crashes, and I want to use the whole final surface as one file.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Typically, i export the terrain to inroads and generate the graphics through Inroads. However, I just want to see if ORD has this capability.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thanks,&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Emily&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Survey Data - Field Book - Export to ASCII Data</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/road___site_design/f/geopak-inroads-mx-openroads-forum/239139/survey-data---field-book---export-to-ascii-data</link><pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2022 17:44:37 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:af3bc45b-f489-4922-8b65-03dd8dbc23fc</guid><dc:creator>Emily Gordon</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Good Morning,&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I am trying to export a survey book to ASCII file format, Is there a way to export the data to this format in ORD?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img style="max-height:240px;max-width:320px;" src="/resized-image/__size/640x480/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/5922/pastedimage1670262321799v1.png" alt=" " /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Ask A Question II</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/achievements/cd3cd235-25c1-476e-bb88-33a5705ca45a</link><pubDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2022 09:22:51 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:6e4a0ce4-89cd-4ab3-8021-76c072e01209</guid><dc:creator /><description>Ask 10 questions in a forum.</description></item><item><title>File opening Slow- Reads all files in within workset</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/road___site_design/f/geopak-inroads-mx-openroads-forum/238442/file-opening-slow--reads-all-files-in-within-workset</link><pubDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2022 13:14:17 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:ed8b2085-3881-4029-a93f-eae29ff2f917</guid><dc:creator>Emily Gordon</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Good Morning,&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When I open files, I notice that the file opening dialog will read our dnglib files, the reference files for the dgn etc.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But then it will read dgn files that are not referenced in the .dgn, but that are within the same workset.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Sometimes it will get stuck on larger GDTM files that are not even referenced in the model, The only work around is to cut the extraneous files and remove it from the workset filepath.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I am unsure if this is a mapping issue with our configuration.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;img alt=" " src="/resized-image/__size/320x240/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/5922/pastedimage1668777285035v1.png" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>