<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://communities.bentley.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><channel><title>Anna's Communities Activities</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/members/b923514d_2d00_f4d1_2d00_4567_2d00_8516_2d00_d0998eb15673</link><description>Recent activity for people in Anna's community</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 12</generator><item><title>Issue on torsion checks of round HSS using AISC 360-10</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/ram-staad/f/ram-staad-forum/131022/issue-on-torsion-checks-of-round-hss-using-aisc-360-10</link><pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2017 11:25:18 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:9c39c17d-3021-4ab1-b0ff-b1973c8265e5</guid><dc:creator>Anna</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I am analyzing a a frame of primarily&amp;nbsp;individually defined round HSS&amp;nbsp;sections, sections are defined&amp;nbsp;as below.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img alt=" " /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When the frame is post-processed with the AISC 360-10 code Method ASD, it appears that even when the code states TORSION 0, the program still runs a torsion check for sections that were individually defined round&amp;nbsp;HSS (though the standard Pipe&amp;nbsp;sections did not have a torsion check completed).&amp;nbsp; My understanding is that no torsion checks should be completed when the torsion parameter is set to 0 - is this&amp;nbsp;wrong?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Additionally, the results for the torsion checks are wildly (and exponentially)&amp;nbsp;larger than expected for members that had been individually specified&amp;nbsp;(refer to image of Design Output below for a 356mm diameter hollow section with 35mm wall thickness).&amp;nbsp; The other check outputs&amp;nbsp;for bending, axial and shear&amp;nbsp;are as&amp;nbsp;expected in terms of ratio outputs, very low.&amp;nbsp; However,&amp;nbsp;the allowable Torsion Capacity is much lower than expected with &lt;strong&gt;6.52e-03&amp;nbsp;kNm&amp;nbsp;&lt;/strong&gt;for the size of section, which leads to a&amp;nbsp;ratio of 7.245 for torsion, this is then amplified using the combined ratio&amp;nbsp;H3 clause&amp;nbsp;and results in an even higher UR value of approx&amp;nbsp;57.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It appears that STAAD is using an odd&amp;nbsp;torsional J value or Ix in&amp;nbsp;calculating the Torsional Capacity for specified round HSS sections.&amp;nbsp; Can this value be amended? Or is there a way to get STAAD to ignore the Torsion checks for specified&amp;nbsp;round HSS?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img alt=" " /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thanks&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>